It looks like major modifications to the CFPA are on the table, including eliminating many of the most troubling elements, such as the “plain vanilla” proposal, the consumer comprehension tests, and the application to non-financial firms. Details here.
Mac says:
From the article:
Let us hope Frank’s supervision and scrutiny will be a tad better than the supervision and scrutiny he paid to Fannie and Freddie, not to mention Countrywide and his friend Angelo. I would not trust Franks to run a hot dog stand. How about a regulation that prohibits all of these folks from contributing to Congressional and Presidential campaigns and proibits any politician from receiving any special favors from those whom they are regulating?
Geitner said,
Why must everything be done in a hurry with this administration? It makes everyone suspicious as so much of this has been done before anyone has a chance to study legislation or even read it and know what is in the bills. This “urgency” is getting a bit old.
Also, the same foxes who are guarding this hen house were guarding or running the last hen house that collapsed. Somehow, this does not give me a feeling of great comfort or security.
Also, from the article:
And, what in the hell does HUD have to do with any of this and why are they one of the overseers?
September 22, 2009, 11:56 pmSecond Amendment Sister says:
Where do these people learn to write “clear, simple, and concise” English phrases?
There, Barney, fixed it for you. *rolls eyes*
September 23, 2009, 12:45 amMike McDougal says:
Comprehension tests? I’m all for that.
September 23, 2009, 3:17 amrunape says:
I get you don’t buy behavioral law and econ, but the plain vanilla most provision was one of the “most troubling” to you?
September 23, 2009, 7:42 am