<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Workers’ Compensation Benefits “for Psychological Injuries” Due to Employer’s Legitimate “Disciplinary Action and Reprimands” — or Due to Layoffs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://volokh.com/2009/10/07/workers-compensation-benefits-for-psychological-injuries-due-to-employers-legitimate-disciplinary-action-and-reprimands-or-due-to-layoffs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://volokh.com/2009/10/07/workers-compensation-benefits-for-psychological-injuries-due-to-employers-legitimate-disciplinary-action-and-reprimands-or-due-to-layoffs/</link>
	<description>Commentary on law, public policy, and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 03:54:08 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ron Miller</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/10/07/workers-compensation-benefits-for-psychological-injuries-due-to-employers-legitimate-disciplinary-action-and-reprimands-or-due-to-layoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-671106</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=19772#comment-671106</guid>
		<description>The question here if very narrow; whether psychological injuries caused
by legitimate personnel decisions are compensable for workers comp.  Someone correct me if I&#039;m wrong but has a court in the country under any workers comp statutory scheme found differently?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question here if very narrow; whether psychological injuries caused<br />
by legitimate personnel decisions are compensable for workers comp.  Someone correct me if I’m wrong but has a court in the country under any workers comp statutory scheme found differently?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: readery</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/10/07/workers-compensation-benefits-for-psychological-injuries-due-to-employers-legitimate-disciplinary-action-and-reprimands-or-due-to-layoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-668711</link>
		<dc:creator>readery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 02:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=19772#comment-668711</guid>
		<description>If they were, then presumably psychological injuries due to a failure to hire would as well. (And would there a requirement to apply before liability attaches?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they were, then presumably psychological injuries due to a failure to hire would as well. (And would there a requirement to apply before liability attaches?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PrivatePigg</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/10/07/workers-compensation-benefits-for-psychological-injuries-due-to-employers-legitimate-disciplinary-action-and-reprimands-or-due-to-layoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-668705</link>
		<dc:creator>PrivatePigg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 02:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=19772#comment-668705</guid>
		<description>Except that in Europe the decision would have been the opposite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except that in Europe the decision would have been the opposite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apu Nahasapasapeemipetilon</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/10/07/workers-compensation-benefits-for-psychological-injuries-due-to-employers-legitimate-disciplinary-action-and-reprimands-or-due-to-layoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-668574</link>
		<dc:creator>Apu Nahasapasapeemipetilon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 20:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=19772#comment-668574</guid>
		<description>this sounds like something that would come up in Europe rather than here...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this sounds like something that would come up in Europe rather than here...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Slater</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/10/07/workers-compensation-benefits-for-psychological-injuries-due-to-employers-legitimate-disciplinary-action-and-reprimands-or-due-to-layoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-668507</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Slater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=19772#comment-668507</guid>
		<description>This is standard workers&#039; comp law.  I&#039;m surprised this case made it as far as it did, although I guess there is a right of appeal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is standard workers’ comp law.  I’m surprised this case made it as far as it did, although I guess there is a right of appeal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Gividen</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/10/07/workers-compensation-benefits-for-psychological-injuries-due-to-employers-legitimate-disciplinary-action-and-reprimands-or-due-to-layoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-668497</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Gividen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=19772#comment-668497</guid>
		<description>Some times stupid facts make smart law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some times stupid facts make smart law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whit</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/10/07/workers-compensation-benefits-for-psychological-injuries-due-to-employers-legitimate-disciplinary-action-and-reprimands-or-due-to-layoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-668493</link>
		<dc:creator>whit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=19772#comment-668493</guid>
		<description>there was a guy i worked with in hawaii who pulled a similar (imo) scam.

he was disciplined for misconduct and given a 2 week suspension.  after the suspension, he went out on &quot;stress leave&quot; for several months. the cause of the stress?  being suspended.  lol.  so, he got a 3 month vacation with pay because of the misconduct suspension.  the administration was NOT amused, but there was nothing they could do about it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there was a guy i worked with in hawaii who pulled a similar (imo) scam.</p>
<p>he was disciplined for misconduct and given a 2 week suspension.  after the suspension, he went out on “stress leave” for several months. the cause of the stress?  being suspended.  lol.  so, he got a 3 month vacation with pay because of the misconduct suspension.  the administration was NOT amused, but there was nothing they could do about it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/10/07/workers-compensation-benefits-for-psychological-injuries-due-to-employers-legitimate-disciplinary-action-and-reprimands-or-due-to-layoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-668490</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=19772#comment-668490</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t worry Professor Volokh, Obamacare will pay their salary, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don’t worry Professor Volokh, Obamacare will pay their salary, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
