<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: J.W. Verret Guest-Blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://volokh.com/2009/10/11/j-w-verret-guest-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://volokh.com/2009/10/11/j-w-verret-guest-blogging/</link>
	<description>Commentary on law, public policy, and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:52:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: student debt consolidation loans discount</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/10/11/j-w-verret-guest-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-954505</link>
		<dc:creator>student debt consolidation loans discount</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 06:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=19929#comment-954505</guid>
		<description>Best Wishes, &lt;a href=&quot;http://intensedebate.com/people/studentdebtcons&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;student debt consolidation loans discount&lt;/a&gt;, [url= http://intensedebate.com/people/studentdebtcons ]student debt consolidation loans discount[/url],  :[,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best Wishes, <a href="http://intensedebate.com/people/studentdebtcons" rel="nofollow">student debt consolidation loans discount</a>, [url= <a href="http://intensedebate.com/people/studentdebtcons" rel="nofollow">http://intensedebate.com/people/studentdebtcons</a> ]student debt consolidation loans discount[/url],  :[,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bbw sex here</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/10/11/j-w-verret-guest-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-954423</link>
		<dc:creator>bbw sex here</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 04:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=19929#comment-954423</guid>
		<description>Only, &lt;a href=&quot;http://intensedebate.com/people/bbwsexst#1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bbw sex here&lt;/a&gt; [url=http://intensedebate.com/people/bbwsexst#1]bbw sex here[/url],  uhotwh,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only, <a href="http://intensedebate.com/people/bbwsexst#1" rel="nofollow">bbw sex here</a> [url=http://intensedebate.com/people/bbwsexst#1]bbw sex here[/url],  uhotwh,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stones Cry Out - If they keep silent&#8230; &#187; Things Heard: e89v2</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/10/11/j-w-verret-guest-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-671507</link>
		<dc:creator>Stones Cry Out - If they keep silent&#8230; &#187; Things Heard: e89v2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=19929#comment-671507</guid>
		<description>[...] corporate law and the bailout &#8230; and the implications of a large stake-holding government sharesholder immune to corporate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] corporate law and the bailout &#8230; and the implications of a large stake-holding government sharesholder immune to corporate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tueday Highlights &#124; Pseudo-Polymath</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/10/11/j-w-verret-guest-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-671505</link>
		<dc:creator>Tueday Highlights &#124; Pseudo-Polymath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=19929#comment-671505</guid>
		<description>[...] corporate law and the bailout &#8230; and the implications of a large stake-holding government sharesholder immune to corporate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] corporate law and the bailout &#8230; and the implications of a large stake-holding government sharesholder immune to corporate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john jones</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/10/11/j-w-verret-guest-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-671109</link>
		<dc:creator>john jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=19929#comment-671109</guid>
		<description>Professor Verret&#039;s work is very important.  The United States owns all, most, or a big part of GM, AIG, and Citibank.  What&#039;s the exit strategy?  And, by the way, we&#039;ve nationalized Fannie and Freddie such that the federal government and not the private sector runs the mortgage market in the U.S. Is that permanent?  While we enjoy playing Monday morning General and debating when to leave Afganistan and Iraq, we should also be talking about how and when to exit the private sector.  While it&#039;s all well and good to celebrate when the taxpayer makes money on investments in the private sector, let&#039;s remember that most if not all of us would rather the government own no preferred stock.  Personally I&#039;d rather take a loss and get out of these investments than strategize about how to advance taxpayer as investor interests at the expense of non-taxpayer holders of equity and debt.  I know that now what&#039;s good for GM is literally good for America, but it&#039;s hard for me to cheer for GM at the expense of Ford when Ford didn&#039;t need government help and GM did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Professor Verret&#8217;s work is very important.  The United States owns all, most, or a big part of GM, AIG, and Citibank.  What&#8217;s the exit strategy?  And, by the way, we&#8217;ve nationalized Fannie and Freddie such that the federal government and not the private sector runs the mortgage market in the U.S. Is that permanent?  While we enjoy playing Monday morning General and debating when to leave Afganistan and Iraq, we should also be talking about how and when to exit the private sector.  While it&#8217;s all well and good to celebrate when the taxpayer makes money on investments in the private sector, let&#8217;s remember that most if not all of us would rather the government own no preferred stock.  Personally I&#8217;d rather take a loss and get out of these investments than strategize about how to advance taxpayer as investor interests at the expense of non-taxpayer holders of equity and debt.  I know that now what&#8217;s good for GM is literally good for America, but it&#8217;s hard for me to cheer for GM at the expense of Ford when Ford didn&#8217;t need government help and GM did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

