Comments on: Bainbridge, Tabarrok, and Levitt on Williamson http://volokh.com/2009/10/12/bainbridge-tabarrok-and-levitt-on-williamson/ Commentary on law, public policy, and more Tue, 08 May 2012 01:46:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: wulfmankarl http://volokh.com/2009/10/12/bainbridge-tabarrok-and-levitt-on-williamson/comment-page-1/#comment-671231 wulfmankarl Mon, 12 Oct 2009 22:07:22 +0000 http://volokh.com/?p=19960#comment-671231 Adam Smith voicing from beyond, shows how to fight the growing Oligarchy. Mediated by Joey Panto. http://02e56fa.netsolhost.com/blog1/index.php/2009/10/07/adam-smith-how-we-can-fight-the-oligarch Adam Smith voicing from beyond, shows how to fight the growing Oligarchy. Mediated by Joey Panto.
http://02e56fa.netsolhost.com/blog1/index.php/2009/10/07/adam-smith-how-we-can-fight-the-oligarch

]]> By: Martinned http://volokh.com/2009/10/12/bainbridge-tabarrok-and-levitt-on-williamson/comment-page-1/#comment-671055 Martinned Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:24:24 +0000 http://volokh.com/?p=19960#comment-671055 <blockquote>In Adam Smith there is the pin factory and the market and from that beginning we trace the long literature in economics focused on the twin questions, What price to set? How much to produce? Following Coase, Williamson asks different questions, Why a pin factory?</blockquote>Nicely put... Maybe someone should write a post on Volokh itself, since the two earlier posts about this year's Nobel seem to have received very little attention. You'd think lawyers would be more interested in the Economics Nobel Prize going to two people who have been thinking all their lives about <blockquote>Why is there Law?</blockquote>

In Adam Smith there is the pin factory and the market and from that beginning we trace the long literature in economics focused on the twin questions, What price to set? How much to produce? Following Coase, Williamson asks different questions, Why a pin factory?

Nicely put…

Maybe someone should write a post on Volokh itself, since the two earlier posts about this year’s Nobel seem to have received very little attention. You’d think lawyers would be more interested in the Economics Nobel Prize going to two people who have been thinking all their lives about

Why is there Law?

]]>