<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Peerless Umpire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://volokh.com/2009/10/28/the-peerless-umpire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://volokh.com/2009/10/28/the-peerless-umpire/</link>
	<description>Commentary on law, public policy, and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:33:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank	Lockerz</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/10/28/the-peerless-umpire/comment-page-1/#comment-753158</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank	Lockerz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 17:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=20756#comment-753158</guid>
		<description>Hi. I don&#039;t read many blogs, but yours is of thelittle I follow.Have a awesome day!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. I don&#8217;t read many blogs, but yours is of thelittle I follow.Have a awesome day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Hall</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/10/28/the-peerless-umpire/comment-page-1/#comment-680768</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=20756#comment-680768</guid>
		<description>So if &quot;umpire&quot; is a contraction of &quot;noumpire&quot; which is a debasement of &quot;noumpere&quot; which means &quot;peerless, without equal, surpassing all others”, does that mean that umpires are common, pedestrian, and easily surpassed?   Sounds good to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if &#8220;umpire&#8221; is a contraction of &#8220;noumpire&#8221; which is a debasement of &#8220;noumpere&#8221; which means &#8220;peerless, without equal, surpassing all others”, does that mean that umpires are common, pedestrian, and easily surpassed?   Sounds good to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura(southernxyl)</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/10/28/the-peerless-umpire/comment-page-1/#comment-680210</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura(southernxyl)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 23:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=20756#comment-680210</guid>
		<description>Close English word:  &quot;unparalleled&quot;.

&quot;That ain&#039;t my style,&quot; said Casey.  &quot;Strike one,&quot; the umpire said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Close English word:  &#8220;unparalleled&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;That ain&#8217;t my style,&#8221; said Casey.  &#8220;Strike one,&#8221; the umpire said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can't find a good name</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/10/28/the-peerless-umpire/comment-page-1/#comment-679885</link>
		<dc:creator>Can't find a good name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=20756#comment-679885</guid>
		<description>Etymologically, then, when an umpire goes to the movies, his favorite candy ought to be Sno-Caps, because &quot;nonpareil&quot; and &quot;umpire&quot; derive from the same Latin roots meaning &quot;having no equal.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Etymologically, then, when an umpire goes to the movies, his favorite candy ought to be Sno-Caps, because &#8220;nonpareil&#8221; and &#8220;umpire&#8221; derive from the same Latin roots meaning &#8220;having no equal.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Northern Dave</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/10/28/the-peerless-umpire/comment-page-1/#comment-679591</link>
		<dc:creator>Northern Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 01:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=20756#comment-679591</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-679534&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-679534&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;AP&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: According to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.etymonline.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.etymonline.com&lt;/A&gt;:c.1400, noumper, from O.Fr. nonper “odd number, not even,” ....
&lt;/blockquote&gt;


Ergo sum no Umpire can be a Zero :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-679534">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-679534" rel="nofollow">AP</a></strong>: According to <a href="http://www.etymonline.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.etymonline.com</a>:c.1400, noumper, from O.Fr. nonper “odd number, not even,” &#8230;.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Ergo sum no Umpire can be a Zero :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisTS</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/10/28/the-peerless-umpire/comment-page-1/#comment-679536</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisTS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=20756#comment-679536</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;“peerless, without equal, surpassing all others.”&lt;/em&gt;

Let&#039;s just keep this to ourselves, ok?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>“peerless, without equal, surpassing all others.”</em></p>
<p>Let&#8217;s just keep this to ourselves, ok?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AP</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/10/28/the-peerless-umpire/comment-page-1/#comment-679534</link>
		<dc:creator>AP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=20756#comment-679534</guid>
		<description>According to www.etymonline.com:

c.1400, noumper, from O.Fr. nonper &quot;odd number, not even,&quot; in reference to a third person to arbitrate between two, from non &quot;not&quot; + per &quot;equal,&quot; from L. par. Initial -n- lost by c.1440 due to faulty separation of a noumpere, heard as an oumpere. Originally legal, the gaming sense first recorded 1714 (in wrestling). Short form ump is attested from 1915. The verb is first recorded 1609, from the noun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <a href="http://www.etymonline.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.etymonline.com</a>:</p>
<p>c.1400, noumper, from O.Fr. nonper &#8220;odd number, not even,&#8221; in reference to a third person to arbitrate between two, from non &#8220;not&#8221; + per &#8220;equal,&#8221; from L. par. Initial -n- lost by c.1440 due to faulty separation of a noumpere, heard as an oumpere. Originally legal, the gaming sense first recorded 1714 (in wrestling). Short form ump is attested from 1915. The verb is first recorded 1609, from the noun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

