<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: He-Man on Executive Power</title>
	<atom:link href="http://volokh.com/2009/11/10/he-man-on-executive-power/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/10/he-man-on-executive-power/</link>
	<description>Commentary on law, public policy, and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:52:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The American Conservative &#187; Bumper-Stickering A Reasonable Decision</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/10/he-man-on-executive-power/comment-page-1/#comment-745362</link>
		<dc:creator>The American Conservative &#187; Bumper-Stickering A Reasonable Decision</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 00:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21443#comment-745362</guid>
		<description>[...] of humiliating defeats in Federal court.  Its stubborn attachment to the &#8220;He-man&#8221; theory of executive power &#8212; which holds that the Executive branch can pretty much do anything in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of humiliating defeats in Federal court.  Its stubborn attachment to the &#8220;He-man&#8221; theory of executive power &#8212; which holds that the Executive branch can pretty much do anything in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delpha Cariveau</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/10/he-man-on-executive-power/comment-page-1/#comment-716088</link>
		<dc:creator>Delpha Cariveau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21443#comment-716088</guid>
		<description>Only want to say your article is striking. The clarity in your post is simply striking and i can take for granted you are an expert on this field. Well with your permission allow me to grab your rss feed to keep up to date with succeeding post. Thanks a million and please keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only want to say your article is striking. The clarity in your post is simply striking and i can take for granted you are an expert on this field. Well with your permission allow me to grab your rss feed to keep up to date with succeeding post. Thanks a million and please keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene Madison</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/10/he-man-on-executive-power/comment-page-1/#comment-687098</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene Madison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 07:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21443#comment-687098</guid>
		<description>Interesting... Is the point that there is nothing we can do once &#039;Adam&#039; (aka the first &#039;man&#039; aka King or President) has the power just because he says it&#039;s so?  And if he uses the power for good, the people won&#039;t try to rescind in some way.. but if he uses it for bad, enough time passes people have no idea where the power came from, or how they can stop it?

It&#039;s time like these I wish Orko were here... he&#039;d know what to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting&#8230; Is the point that there is nothing we can do once &#8216;Adam&#8217; (aka the first &#8216;man&#8217; aka King or President) has the power just because he says it&#8217;s so?  And if he uses the power for good, the people won&#8217;t try to rescind in some way.. but if he uses it for bad, enough time passes people have no idea where the power came from, or how they can stop it?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s time like these I wish Orko were here&#8230; he&#8217;d know what to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thales</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/10/he-man-on-executive-power/comment-page-1/#comment-686750</link>
		<dc:creator>Thales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21443#comment-686750</guid>
		<description>Ricardo: Noted, but in practice members of the Bush Administration often embraced *both* theories (academic unitary executive and vague inhererent and virtually unlimited Article II commander in chief powers) and used the terminology ambiguously--see many of President Bush&#039;s signing statements simultaneously. And occasionally and unconvincingly affected complete ignorance of either theory--see David Addington&#039;s congressional testimony.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ricardo: Noted, but in practice members of the Bush Administration often embraced *both* theories (academic unitary executive and vague inhererent and virtually unlimited Article II commander in chief powers) and used the terminology ambiguously&#8211;see many of President Bush&#8217;s signing statements simultaneously. And occasionally and unconvincingly affected complete ignorance of either theory&#8211;see David Addington&#8217;s congressional testimony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention The Volokh Conspiracy » Blog Archive » He-Man on Executive Power -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/10/he-man-on-executive-power/comment-page-1/#comment-686692</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention The Volokh Conspiracy » Blog Archive » He-Man on Executive Power -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21443#comment-686692</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by PostRank – Economics, PostRank – Law. PostRank – Law said: He-Man on Executive Power http://bit.ly/Indvm #postrank #law [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by PostRank – Economics, PostRank – Law. PostRank – Law said: He-Man on Executive Power <a href="http://bit.ly/Indvm" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/Indvm</a> #postrank #law [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rpt</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/10/he-man-on-executive-power/comment-page-1/#comment-686639</link>
		<dc:creator>rpt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 04:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21443#comment-686639</guid>
		<description>This comment contains no snark, irony or sarcasm. 

Prof Somin, your recent posts seem to be substantially more substantive, thought provoking and less partisan than most of the other posters here, save Prof. Kerr. The anniversary of communism ones were particularly good because they seemed to reflect feelings based on life experiences leavened by ideology, rather than just ideology. Thanks for the time you spend on them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This comment contains no snark, irony or sarcasm. </p>
<p>Prof Somin, your recent posts seem to be substantially more substantive, thought provoking and less partisan than most of the other posters here, save Prof. Kerr. The anniversary of communism ones were particularly good because they seemed to reflect feelings based on life experiences leavened by ideology, rather than just ideology. Thanks for the time you spend on them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricardo</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/10/he-man-on-executive-power/comment-page-1/#comment-686607</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 02:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21443#comment-686607</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-686584&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-686584&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;fwb&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: WTF: Lincoln was one of the earliest of the unitary executive theory advocates. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&quot;Unitary&quot; executive is a different theory: that all the power vested in the Executive Branch ultimately resides with the President and every person who serves in the Executive Branch serves at the whim of the President.  This is a different theory from the one that says the President has virtually unlimited powers as long as he claims his actions stem from national security or wartime considerations.

In terms of Lincoln, people often pass over the fact that the Lincoln Administration went above and beyond the call of duty in the way it treated captured Confederates.  After the Sioux Uprising, the U.S. held one of the largest (if not the largest) mass execution in history of the key members of that uprising.  The U.S. had the power and legal authority to deal with captured Confederates the same way.  Instead, it accorded them all the rights and privileges then afforded to captured foreign enemy soldiers under the laws of war at the time.  Lincoln, unlike Bush, did not claim to be able to create a category of people to whom no laws applied.  Instead, he fit Confederate soldiers into a pre-existing legal category (foreign soldiers at war with the U.S.) and applied the law to those prisoners without exception.  Lincoln and his Attorney General were very, very rigorous in applying international legal norms to the Civil War even though they were under no obligation to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-686584">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-686584" rel="nofollow">fwb</a></strong>: WTF: Lincoln was one of the earliest of the unitary executive theory advocates.
</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8220;Unitary&#8221; executive is a different theory: that all the power vested in the Executive Branch ultimately resides with the President and every person who serves in the Executive Branch serves at the whim of the President.  This is a different theory from the one that says the President has virtually unlimited powers as long as he claims his actions stem from national security or wartime considerations.</p>
<p>In terms of Lincoln, people often pass over the fact that the Lincoln Administration went above and beyond the call of duty in the way it treated captured Confederates.  After the Sioux Uprising, the U.S. held one of the largest (if not the largest) mass execution in history of the key members of that uprising.  The U.S. had the power and legal authority to deal with captured Confederates the same way.  Instead, it accorded them all the rights and privileges then afforded to captured foreign enemy soldiers under the laws of war at the time.  Lincoln, unlike Bush, did not claim to be able to create a category of people to whom no laws applied.  Instead, he fit Confederate soldiers into a pre-existing legal category (foreign soldiers at war with the U.S.) and applied the law to those prisoners without exception.  Lincoln and his Attorney General were very, very rigorous in applying international legal norms to the Civil War even though they were under no obligation to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fwb</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/10/he-man-on-executive-power/comment-page-1/#comment-686584</link>
		<dc:creator>fwb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21443#comment-686584</guid>
		<description>WTF:  Lincoln was one of the earliest of the unitary executive theory advocates.  Bush/Cheney, as terrible as they were, did not create the concept.  Deomcratic presidents like Wilson and Roosevelt held the same freaking belief.  Of course, it was a republican Nixon who went so far as to say the law is what the President says it is.

Finger pointing at Bush does nothing to get to the root of the problem.  The President is the head butler.  He has approximately 10 enumerated powers.  He is NOT the leader.  He is a public servant.  When folks get back to using the correct language about the position, maybe the men in the position will accept the fact that they are not elected to lead but to serve.

Tiocfaidh ar la!


PS:  Check out The Cult of the Presidency by Healy of CATO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF:  Lincoln was one of the earliest of the unitary executive theory advocates.  Bush/Cheney, as terrible as they were, did not create the concept.  Deomcratic presidents like Wilson and Roosevelt held the same freaking belief.  Of course, it was a republican Nixon who went so far as to say the law is what the President says it is.</p>
<p>Finger pointing at Bush does nothing to get to the root of the problem.  The President is the head butler.  He has approximately 10 enumerated powers.  He is NOT the leader.  He is a public servant.  When folks get back to using the correct language about the position, maybe the men in the position will accept the fact that they are not elected to lead but to serve.</p>
<p>Tiocfaidh ar la!</p>
<p>PS:  Check out The Cult of the Presidency by Healy of CATO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Back Up the Paddy Wagons, Congress Is Breaking The Law! &#171; Moonbat Patrol</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/10/he-man-on-executive-power/comment-page-1/#comment-686583</link>
		<dc:creator>Back Up the Paddy Wagons, Congress Is Breaking The Law! &#171; Moonbat Patrol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21443#comment-686583</guid>
		<description>[...] HE-MAN ON EXECUTIVE POWER THE VOLOKH CONSPIRACY [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] HE-MAN ON EXECUTIVE POWER THE VOLOKH CONSPIRACY [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisTS</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/10/he-man-on-executive-power/comment-page-1/#comment-686574</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisTS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21443#comment-686574</guid>
		<description>Is He-Man always orange?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is He-Man always orange?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anderson</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/10/he-man-on-executive-power/comment-page-1/#comment-686551</link>
		<dc:creator>Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21443#comment-686551</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Professor Mansfield trounced you in that debate.&lt;/em&gt;

*Harvey* Mansfield?  Permit me to doubt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Professor Mansfield trounced you in that debate.</em></p>
<p>*Harvey* Mansfield?  Permit me to doubt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMA</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/10/he-man-on-executive-power/comment-page-1/#comment-686547</link>
		<dc:creator>JMA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21443#comment-686547</guid>
		<description>Heheh. Ilya, d&#039;you realize that amounts to like one post by you in the past few thousand years on the subject of executive power? Jeez, you are so partisan...

Ouch. My tongue is stuck in my cheek. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heheh. Ilya, d&#8217;you realize that amounts to like one post by you in the past few thousand years on the subject of executive power? Jeez, you are so partisan&#8230;</p>
<p>Ouch. My tongue is stuck in my cheek. :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dildo Biggins</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/10/he-man-on-executive-power/comment-page-1/#comment-686536</link>
		<dc:creator>Dildo Biggins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21443#comment-686536</guid>
		<description>Couple things seem clear to me now that weren&#039;t clear 2 years ago when watching this show.

1. He-Man was clearly an idealized homosexual male drawn and voiced by gay males. 
2. Skeletor was clearly an Arab terrorist. 
3. He-Man&#039;s crime fighting efforts would have been greatly assisted by the Patriot Act.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couple things seem clear to me now that weren&#8217;t clear 2 years ago when watching this show.</p>
<p>1. He-Man was clearly an idealized homosexual male drawn and voiced by gay males.<br />
2. Skeletor was clearly an Arab terrorist.<br />
3. He-Man&#8217;s crime fighting efforts would have been greatly assisted by the Patriot Act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ilya Somin</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/10/he-man-on-executive-power/comment-page-1/#comment-686528</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilya Somin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21443#comment-686528</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;One post in 8 years? Okey dokey.
&lt;/em&gt;

I&#039;ve only been a blogger for 3 years and executive power is not one of my major areas of expertise.

&lt;em&gt;And what a post it was. Heres an excerpt from that post:

    I even agree with Posner’s claim that the Bush administration has trampled on civil liberties far less than previous wartime administration’s,
&lt;/em&gt;

Given how bad those administrations were (e.g. - imprisoning 100,000 Japanese-Americans during WWII), that&#039;s not much of a compliment to Bush.

&lt;em&gt;There’s clear cut denunciations of abuse of executive power, and then the is whatever your post was.&lt;/em&gt;

I don&#039;t think it gets much more clear cut than a long and detailed critique of claims to unlimited executive power in wartime. Plus, I would note my debate with John Yoo and other criticisms of the Bush administration&#039;s positoin on executive power in fora other than the VC. Just because it&#039;s not on the VC, doesn&#039;t mean I didn&#039;t do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>One post in 8 years? Okey dokey.<br />
</em></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve only been a blogger for 3 years and executive power is not one of my major areas of expertise.</p>
<p><em>And what a post it was. Heres an excerpt from that post:</p>
<p>    I even agree with Posner’s claim that the Bush administration has trampled on civil liberties far less than previous wartime administration’s,<br />
</em></p>
<p>Given how bad those administrations were (e.g. &#8211; imprisoning 100,000 Japanese-Americans during WWII), that&#8217;s not much of a compliment to Bush.</p>
<p><em>There’s clear cut denunciations of abuse of executive power, and then the is whatever your post was.</em></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it gets much more clear cut than a long and detailed critique of claims to unlimited executive power in wartime. Plus, I would note my debate with John Yoo and other criticisms of the Bush administration&#8217;s positoin on executive power in fora other than the VC. Just because it&#8217;s not on the VC, doesn&#8217;t mean I didn&#8217;t do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: biespiel</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/10/he-man-on-executive-power/comment-page-1/#comment-686509</link>
		<dc:creator>biespiel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21443#comment-686509</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Perhaps you missed my long and detailed post criticizing the Administration’s position on executive power, to say nothing of my debate with John Yoo and others.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

One post in 8 years?  Okey dokey.

And what a post it was.  Heres an excerpt from that post:

&lt;blockquote&gt;I even agree with Posner&#039;s claim that the Bush administration has trampled on civil liberties far less than previous wartime administration&#039;s,&lt;/blockquote&gt;

There&#039;s clear cut denunciations of abuse of executive power, and then the is whatever your post was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Perhaps you missed my long and detailed post criticizing the Administration’s position on executive power, to say nothing of my debate with John Yoo and others.</p></blockquote>
<p>One post in 8 years?  Okey dokey.</p>
<p>And what a post it was.  Heres an excerpt from that post:</p>
<blockquote><p>I even agree with Posner&#8217;s claim that the Bush administration has trampled on civil liberties far less than previous wartime administration&#8217;s,</p></blockquote>
<p>There&#8217;s clear cut denunciations of abuse of executive power, and then the is whatever your post was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Repeal 16-17</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/10/he-man-on-executive-power/comment-page-1/#comment-686494</link>
		<dc:creator>Repeal 16-17</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21443#comment-686494</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;In one of my recent Constitutional Law classes, I had occasion to quote a much-neglected legal authority: He-Man. Like many presidents, especially in wartime, He-Man claims that he has “fabulous secret powers” and even summarizes his legal position with the immortal words “I have the power.” It’s the best short summary of the late Bush Administration’s theory of executive power that I have seen so far.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Stop watching YouTube and get some fresh air. Otherwise, you&#039;ll be telling us Hillary Clinton is She-Ra and the leaders of the Congress are the Thundercats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>In one of my recent Constitutional Law classes, I had occasion to quote a much-neglected legal authority: He-Man. Like many presidents, especially in wartime, He-Man claims that he has “fabulous secret powers” and even summarizes his legal position with the immortal words “I have the power.” It’s the best short summary of the late Bush Administration’s theory of executive power that I have seen so far.</p></blockquote>
<p>Stop watching YouTube and get some fresh air. Otherwise, you&#8217;ll be telling us Hillary Clinton is She-Ra and the leaders of the Congress are the Thundercats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perseus</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/10/he-man-on-executive-power/comment-page-1/#comment-686488</link>
		<dc:creator>Perseus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21443#comment-686488</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4915669936022015590&amp;hl=en#&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;to say nothing of my debate with John Yoo and others.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/em&gt;

Professor Mansfield trounced you in that debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><br />
<blockquote><a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4915669936022015590&amp;hl=en#" rel="nofollow">to say nothing of my debate with John Yoo and others.</a></p></blockquote>
<p></em></p>
<p>Professor Mansfield trounced you in that debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Weber</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/10/he-man-on-executive-power/comment-page-1/#comment-686413</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Weber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21443#comment-686413</guid>
		<description>This explains why Bush would end every State of the Union address with a safety lesson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This explains why Bush would end every State of the Union address with a safety lesson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thales</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/10/he-man-on-executive-power/comment-page-1/#comment-686402</link>
		<dc:creator>Thales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21443#comment-686402</guid>
		<description>Why presume that the sorceress of Grayskull is actually benevolent--she claims the power to bestow and revoke executive power at a whim, with no basis in law or accountability for her actions. So perhaps she is Cheney in this analogy, while He-Man is Bush.  Addington would be the unseen Grayskull major-domo.

Another interpretation of the same theme (at about 3:20):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1MBwyj5ziI</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why presume that the sorceress of Grayskull is actually benevolent&#8211;she claims the power to bestow and revoke executive power at a whim, with no basis in law or accountability for her actions. So perhaps she is Cheney in this analogy, while He-Man is Bush.  Addington would be the unseen Grayskull major-domo.</p>
<p>Another interpretation of the same theme (at about 3:20):</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1MBwyj5ziI" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1MBwyj5ziI</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cornellian</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/10/he-man-on-executive-power/comment-page-1/#comment-686391</link>
		<dc:creator>Cornellian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21443#comment-686391</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Yet they doggedly defend a president for whom the word ‘hubris’ might have been invented — one who thinks that the government, under his direction, can rationally reshape the one-sixth of the U.S. economy devoted to health care.”&lt;/em&gt;

As opposed to one who thinks we can send the army overseas to transform an alien dictatorship into a democracy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Yet they doggedly defend a president for whom the word ‘hubris’ might have been invented — one who thinks that the government, under his direction, can rationally reshape the one-sixth of the U.S. economy devoted to health care.”</em></p>
<p>As opposed to one who thinks we can send the army overseas to transform an alien dictatorship into a democracy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cornellian</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/10/he-man-on-executive-power/comment-page-1/#comment-686388</link>
		<dc:creator>Cornellian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21443#comment-686388</guid>
		<description>The thread&#039;s not complete until we have a Python reference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thread&#8217;s not complete until we have a Python reference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Boyden</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/10/he-man-on-executive-power/comment-page-1/#comment-686381</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Boyden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21443#comment-686381</guid>
		<description>Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Garst</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/10/he-man-on-executive-power/comment-page-1/#comment-686366</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Garst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21443#comment-686366</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It’s the best short summary of the late Bush Administration’s theory of executive power that I have seen so far.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It strikes me more as a summary of every administration&#039;s theory of executive power since Coolidge, as well as plenty more before then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It’s the best short summary of the late Bush Administration’s theory of executive power that I have seen so far.</p></blockquote>
<p>It strikes me more as a summary of every administration&#8217;s theory of executive power since Coolidge, as well as plenty more before then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: krs</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/10/he-man-on-executive-power/comment-page-1/#comment-686354</link>
		<dc:creator>krs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21443#comment-686354</guid>
		<description>Wow.  I used to watch that show all the time when I was 5 years old or so.  I didn&#039;t remember it being quite so cheesy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  I used to watch that show all the time when I was 5 years old or so.  I didn&#8217;t remember it being quite so cheesy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SueSimp</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/10/he-man-on-executive-power/comment-page-1/#comment-686330</link>
		<dc:creator>SueSimp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21443#comment-686330</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not exactly a 1L anymore, DC, but I am that age. There must have been re-runs long after the series officially ended, because I was able to watch it when I was a kid... and I&#039;m pretty sure my Battle Cat action figure and Power Sword (with accompanying clanging sword noise feature!) are still kicking around in the attic somewhere. 

And Cornellian, I think clearly we should consider the Sorceress of Grayskull to be an allegory for the Constitution. She vested He-Bush with his fabulous secret powers, but through her power of judicial review, could revoke her gift of the Power Sword.

Also, the Sorceress and He-Man have a telepathic connection. Hence how Bush could know about the secret executive powers that no one else knew of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not exactly a 1L anymore, DC, but I am that age. There must have been re-runs long after the series officially ended, because I was able to watch it when I was a kid&#8230; and I&#8217;m pretty sure my Battle Cat action figure and Power Sword (with accompanying clanging sword noise feature!) are still kicking around in the attic somewhere. </p>
<p>And Cornellian, I think clearly we should consider the Sorceress of Grayskull to be an allegory for the Constitution. She vested He-Bush with his fabulous secret powers, but through her power of judicial review, could revoke her gift of the Power Sword.</p>
<p>Also, the Sorceress and He-Man have a telepathic connection. Hence how Bush could know about the secret executive powers that no one else knew of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: egd</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/10/he-man-on-executive-power/comment-page-1/#comment-686325</link>
		<dc:creator>egd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21443#comment-686325</guid>
		<description>As far as constitutional authority goes, which is the more defensible position: &quot;I have the power&quot; or &quot;I won&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as constitutional authority goes, which is the more defensible position: &#8220;I have the power&#8221; or &#8220;I won&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Chapman</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/10/he-man-on-executive-power/comment-page-1/#comment-686323</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Chapman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21443#comment-686323</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s see... the current crop of 1L&#039;s should be about 23-24 right now, right?  I believe they were all born about the time He-Man went off the air.  I&#039;m just curious how many of them didn&#039;t get the reference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see&#8230; the current crop of 1L&#8217;s should be about 23-24 right now, right?  I believe they were all born about the time He-Man went off the air.  I&#8217;m just curious how many of them didn&#8217;t get the reference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anderson</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/10/he-man-on-executive-power/comment-page-1/#comment-686322</link>
		<dc:creator>Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21443#comment-686322</guid>
		<description>But who could&#039;ve guessed that He-Man&#039;s vice-president would be Skeletor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But who could&#8217;ve guessed that He-Man&#8217;s vice-president would be Skeletor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cornellian</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/10/he-man-on-executive-power/comment-page-1/#comment-686296</link>
		<dc:creator>Cornellian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21443#comment-686296</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;By the way, the power only came to He-Man through the sword, which was given to him by the sorceress of Gray Skull. And she holds the power to take it back at any time if He-Man was to go rogue. &lt;/em&gt;

Interesting.  I am not well versed in He-Man lore and was not aware of that detail.  I&#039;d say that much more closely resembles the British constitutional monarchy, with the Sorceress in the role of monarch and He-Man the prime minister.  The prime minister wields all the power on a day to day basis nominally in the name of the monarch.  The monarch has a mostly ceremonial position, but, at least in theory, still has the ability to seize power back from the prime minister should the prime minister &quot;go rogue.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>By the way, the power only came to He-Man through the sword, which was given to him by the sorceress of Gray Skull. And she holds the power to take it back at any time if He-Man was to go rogue. </em></p>
<p>Interesting.  I am not well versed in He-Man lore and was not aware of that detail.  I&#8217;d say that much more closely resembles the British constitutional monarchy, with the Sorceress in the role of monarch and He-Man the prime minister.  The prime minister wields all the power on a day to day basis nominally in the name of the monarch.  The monarch has a mostly ceremonial position, but, at least in theory, still has the ability to seize power back from the prime minister should the prime minister &#8220;go rogue.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James N. Gibson</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/10/he-man-on-executive-power/comment-page-1/#comment-686295</link>
		<dc:creator>James N. Gibson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21443#comment-686295</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-686285&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-686285&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ilya Somin&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: Actually, the link at the previous comment was a different debate on executive power that I took part in. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fed-soc.org/publications/pubID.172/pub_detail.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here &lt;/a&gt;is the one with me and&#160;Yoo.

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

What was the earlier comment about who was Orko, the magician who kept misplacing things.

By the way, the power only came to He-Man through the sword, which was given to him by the sorceress of Gray Skull. And she holds the power to take it back at any time if He-Man was to go rogue. In that regard I guess she would be the Supreme Court or at least its interpretation of the Constitution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-686285">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-686285" rel="nofollow">Ilya Somin</a></strong>: Actually, the link at the previous comment was a different debate on executive power that I took part in. <a href="http://www.fed-soc.org/publications/pubID.172/pub_detail.asp" rel="nofollow">Here </a>is the one with me and&nbsp;Yoo.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>What was the earlier comment about who was Orko, the magician who kept misplacing things.</p>
<p>By the way, the power only came to He-Man through the sword, which was given to him by the sorceress of Gray Skull. And she holds the power to take it back at any time if He-Man was to go rogue. In that regard I guess she would be the Supreme Court or at least its interpretation of the Constitution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ilya Somin</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/10/he-man-on-executive-power/comment-page-1/#comment-686285</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilya Somin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21443#comment-686285</guid>
		<description>Actually, the link at the previous comment was a different debate on executive power that I took part in. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fed-soc.org/publications/pubID.172/pub_detail.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here &lt;/a&gt;is the one with me and Yoo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the link at the previous comment was a different debate on executive power that I took part in. <a href="http://www.fed-soc.org/publications/pubID.172/pub_detail.asp" rel="nofollow">Here </a>is the one with me and Yoo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ilya Somin</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/10/he-man-on-executive-power/comment-page-1/#comment-686283</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilya Somin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21443#comment-686283</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;There must be a problem with the search program on this site. I just did a search for “Somin + Bush” and for “Somin + Executive” and I couldn’t locate any posts over the past 8 years by Mr. Somin regarding Bush’s abuses of executive power.&lt;/em&gt;

Perhaps you missed &lt;a href=&quot;http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2007_08_19-2007_08_25.shtml#1187914017&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;my long and detailed post &lt;/a&gt;criticizing the Administration&#039;s position on executive power, to say nothing of  &lt;a href=&quot;http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4915669936022015590&amp;hl=en#&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;my debate with John Yoo and others&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>There must be a problem with the search program on this site. I just did a search for “Somin + Bush” and for “Somin + Executive” and I couldn’t locate any posts over the past 8 years by Mr. Somin regarding Bush’s abuses of executive power.</em></p>
<p>Perhaps you missed <a href="http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2007_08_19-2007_08_25.shtml#1187914017" rel="nofollow">my long and detailed post </a>criticizing the Administration&#8217;s position on executive power, to say nothing of  <a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4915669936022015590&#038;hl=en#" rel="nofollow">my debate with John Yoo and others</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kerff</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/10/he-man-on-executive-power/comment-page-1/#comment-686275</link>
		<dc:creator>kerff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21443#comment-686275</guid>
		<description>There must be a problem with the search program on this site.  I just did a search for &quot;Somin + Bush&quot; and for &quot;Somin + Executive&quot; and I couldn&#039;t locate any posts over the past 8 years by Mr. Somin regarding Bush&#039;s abuses of executive power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There must be a problem with the search program on this site.  I just did a search for &#8220;Somin + Bush&#8221; and for &#8220;Somin + Executive&#8221; and I couldn&#8217;t locate any posts over the past 8 years by Mr. Somin regarding Bush&#8217;s abuses of executive power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Random.</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/10/he-man-on-executive-power/comment-page-1/#comment-686268</link>
		<dc:creator>Random.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21443#comment-686268</guid>
		<description>John Yoo is clearly Orko.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Yoo is clearly Orko.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hasmidas</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/10/he-man-on-executive-power/comment-page-1/#comment-686265</link>
		<dc:creator>Hasmidas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21443#comment-686265</guid>
		<description>How about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=quzY7ONePM4&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;She-Ra&lt;/a&gt; to embody the Libertarian ideal? She&#039;s actually a revolutionary attempting to overthrow the tyrannical government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=quzY7ONePM4" rel="nofollow">She-Ra</a> to embody the Libertarian ideal? She&#8217;s actually a revolutionary attempting to overthrow the tyrannical government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

