<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Liveblogging the Federalist Society National Lawyers Convention</title>
	<atom:link href="http://volokh.com/2009/11/11/liveblogging-the-federalist-society-national-lawyers-convention/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/11/liveblogging-the-federalist-society-national-lawyers-convention/</link>
	<description>Commentary on law, public policy, and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:28:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myrtle Beach Attorney</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/11/liveblogging-the-federalist-society-national-lawyers-convention/comment-page-1/#comment-699719</link>
		<dc:creator>Myrtle Beach Attorney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21478#comment-699719</guid>
		<description>If you would like to find information about Colorado Springs Real Estate, visit the Real Estate Book, the web</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you would like to find information about Colorado Springs Real Estate, visit the Real Estate Book, the web</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Professor Chaos</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/11/liveblogging-the-federalist-society-national-lawyers-convention/comment-page-1/#comment-686896</link>
		<dc:creator>Professor Chaos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21478#comment-686896</guid>
		<description>The question isn&#039;t why a Federalist Society member is clerking for a federal court; that&#039;s perfectly unremarkable.  The question is how a federal clerk has sufficient free time to liveblog the convention; I thought those guys were busy, you know, keeping the federal courts running.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question isn&#8217;t why a Federalist Society member is clerking for a federal court; that&#8217;s perfectly unremarkable.  The question is how a federal clerk has sufficient free time to liveblog the convention; I thought those guys were busy, you know, keeping the federal courts running.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davidwhitewolf</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/11/liveblogging-the-federalist-society-national-lawyers-convention/comment-page-1/#comment-686816</link>
		<dc:creator>Davidwhitewolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21478#comment-686816</guid>
		<description>Indeed, and it was quite feisty (as far as legal panels go). Getting ready for work (I&#039;m on  the West Coast) while listening live to a high-minded legal debate on property redistribution with Richard Epstein at one end of the table and the SEIU president (spit, spit) at the other end was pretty cool. I&#039;ll have to check out the liveblogging at the office. Er, I mean, on my lunch break.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, and it was quite feisty (as far as legal panels go). Getting ready for work (I&#8217;m on  the West Coast) while listening live to a high-minded legal debate on property redistribution with Richard Epstein at one end of the table and the SEIU president (spit, spit) at the other end was pretty cool. I&#8217;ll have to check out the liveblogging at the office. Er, I mean, on my lunch break.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/11/liveblogging-the-federalist-society-national-lawyers-convention/comment-page-1/#comment-686736</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21478#comment-686736</guid>
		<description>C-SPAN is broadcasting some of the Federalist convention live this morning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C-SPAN is broadcasting some of the Federalist convention live this morning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: troll_dc2</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/11/liveblogging-the-federalist-society-national-lawyers-convention/comment-page-1/#comment-686713</link>
		<dc:creator>troll_dc2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21478#comment-686713</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;commenters who know more about it than I do are welcome to debate the question of whether livebloggers should be considered members of the media, and if so whether they have the same legal rights as MSM reporters do.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Josh is going to be sending information on public issues to the public at large; in fact, he has been given a special status to be able to do that. In his case, I cannot conjure up a plausible reason as to why he would not be considered a member of the media for all legal purposes. The First Amendment is not limited to specific media; rather, it protects a process and an outlet. 

Perhaps bloggers who focus more on their own views than on telling the world what is going on should not be considered media members for all legal purposes (but they too would have First Amendment rights of some sort).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>commenters who know more about it than I do are welcome to debate the question of whether livebloggers should be considered members of the media, and if so whether they have the same legal rights as MSM reporters do.</p></blockquote>
<p>Josh is going to be sending information on public issues to the public at large; in fact, he has been given a special status to be able to do that. In his case, I cannot conjure up a plausible reason as to why he would not be considered a member of the media for all legal purposes. The First Amendment is not limited to specific media; rather, it protects a process and an outlet. </p>
<p>Perhaps bloggers who focus more on their own views than on telling the world what is going on should not be considered media members for all legal purposes (but they too would have First Amendment rights of some sort).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Blackman</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/11/liveblogging-the-federalist-society-national-lawyers-convention/comment-page-1/#comment-686697</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Blackman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21478#comment-686697</guid>
		<description>Ilya, thanks for the link. If you would like to receive instant updates, please follow me on Twitter at &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/joshbtweets&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://twitter.com/joshbtweets&lt;/a&gt; or subscribe to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://joshblogs.wordpress.com/feed/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;RSS Feed&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ilya, thanks for the link. If you would like to receive instant updates, please follow me on Twitter at <a href="http://twitter.com/joshbtweets" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/joshbtweets</a> or subscribe to the <a href="http://joshblogs.wordpress.com/feed/" rel="nofollow">RSS Feed</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian G.</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/11/liveblogging-the-federalist-society-national-lawyers-convention/comment-page-1/#comment-686637</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 04:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21478#comment-686637</guid>
		<description>I agree that livebloggers should be considered members of the media.  I would argue that for many events, they provide a better service.  For example, I followed the World Series of Poker final table this weekend through Twitter and two live blogs.  The information was much better and more interesting than the edited and condensed news stories the next day.

In this case however, the real question is why is a Federalist Sociery member is clerking for the Federal Court?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that livebloggers should be considered members of the media.  I would argue that for many events, they provide a better service.  For example, I followed the World Series of Poker final table this weekend through Twitter and two live blogs.  The information was much better and more interesting than the edited and condensed news stories the next day.</p>
<p>In this case however, the real question is why is a Federalist Sociery member is clerking for the Federal Court?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

