<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Predicting McDonald</title>
	<atom:link href="http://volokh.com/2009/11/18/predicting-the-mcdonald/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/18/predicting-the-mcdonald/</link>
	<description>Commentary on law, public policy, and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 01:46:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Will the Court Vote on “Incorporating” the Second Amendment? &#124; Think Tank West</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/18/predicting-the-mcdonald/comment-page-1/#comment-774832</link>
		<dc:creator>How Will the Court Vote on “Incorporating” the Second Amendment? &#124; Think Tank West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21724#comment-774832</guid>
		<description>[...] Volokh conspirator Randy Barnett (and Cato senior fellow) also disagrees with Orin, offering this perspective: When choosing between the two pending cases in the Seventh Circuit, why would four Justices grant [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Volokh conspirator Randy Barnett (and Cato senior fellow) also disagrees with Orin, offering this perspective: When choosing between the two pending cases in the Seventh Circuit, why would four Justices grant [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Volokh Conspiracy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More on the McDonald Argument: A Reply to Randy</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/18/predicting-the-mcdonald/comment-page-1/#comment-764175</link>
		<dc:creator>The Volokh Conspiracy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More on the McDonald Argument: A Reply to Randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21724#comment-764175</guid>
		<description>[...] Randy’s earlier response to my initial prediction on how the Court might respond to Alan Gura’s Privileges or Immunities [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Randy’s earlier response to my initial prediction on how the Court might respond to Alan Gura’s Privileges or Immunities [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChicagoGunCase.com &#187; We get questions&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/18/predicting-the-mcdonald/comment-page-1/#comment-698794</link>
		<dc:creator>ChicagoGunCase.com &#187; We get questions&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 07:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21724#comment-698794</guid>
		<description>[...] – because the justices wouldn’t feel like interpreting the Constitution. Prof. Barnett capably responded to that claim, so I didn’t see the need to do so [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] – because the justices wouldn’t feel like interpreting the Constitution. Prof. Barnett capably responded to that claim, so I didn’t see the need to do so [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Volokh Conspiracy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Open Comment Thread on McDonald</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/18/predicting-the-mcdonald/comment-page-1/#comment-689931</link>
		<dc:creator>The Volokh Conspiracy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Open Comment Thread on McDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21724#comment-689931</guid>
		<description>[...] my post predicting the votes in McDonald might draw an disapproving response from Randy, and I see it did. Based on past experience, I gather Randy’s questions directed to me are rhetorical questions [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my post predicting the votes in McDonald might draw an disapproving response from Randy, and I see it did. Based on past experience, I gather Randy’s questions directed to me are rhetorical questions [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

