Pictures and details here.
-
Contact
Search
Stuff From Us
Categories
Archives
Blogroll
- 3 Jews, 4 Opinions
- Agoraphilia
- Althouse
- Andrew Sullivan
- Bainbridge
- Balkinization
- Becker-Posner
- Best of the Web
- Betsy's Page
- Blue Mass. Group
- C-K Faculty Blog
- Cal. App. Report
- Cal. Punitives
- CalPundit
- Cathy Young
- Chequer-Board
- Chicago Faculty Blog
- Concurring Opinions
- Conglomerate
- Copyrights & Campaigns
- CrimLaw
- Dan Drezner
- Dave Kopel
- David Frum
- Day by Day
- Deep Glamour
- Discourse.Net
- ecitsuJ
- Election Law
- Emmanuelle Richard
- Empirical Legal Studies
- Eric Muller
- Fed Soc Debates
- FedSoc Blog
- Former Chef
- Gavel to Gavel
- GeekPress
- Gideon's Trumpet
- Gil Milbauer
- Hit & Run
- How Appealing
- InstaPundit
- Joanne Jacobs
- Jotwell
- KausFiles
- Knowledge Problem
- Language Log
- LawCulture
- Lawrence Solum
- Legal Planet
- Liberty & Power
- Lileks
- Make No Law (Institute for Justice)
- Marginal Revolution
- Marquette Faculty Blog
- Matt Welch
- Matt Yglesias
- Michael Barone
- Michael Dorf
- Neuroethics & Law Blog
- NoodleFood
- Opinio Juris
- OpinionJournal Federation
- Overlawyered
- OxBlog
- Point of Law
- PrawfsBlawg
- Reality-Based Community
- Reason
- Religion Clause
- Ricochet
- Right Coast
- Room for Debate
- Rosenbergs
- ScrappleFace
- Secular Right
- Sentencing Law & Policy
- Sonia Arrison
- Stuart Buck
- Technology Liberation Front
- The Opening Brief
- The Torch
- Tom Palmer
- Truth on the Market
- U Chicago Law Faculty Blog
- Virginia Postrel
- WLF Legal Pulse
- Wonkette
- WSJ Law Blog
Meta
-
M. Gross says:
They had delicious doughnuts, though, who could resist?
Quote
December 16, 2009, 5:25 pmDjDiverDan says:
I didn’t look on the link — Where on the U.S. Capital Building was the banner hung?
Quote
December 16, 2009, 5:33 pmDave N says:
M. Gross is correct. The best line of the entire article was:
Quote
December 16, 2009, 5:34 pmNate says:
Nyuck, nyuck, nyuck. Kopel has demonstrated that he shouldn’t be taken seriously on anything climate change-related.
Quote
December 16, 2009, 5:38 pmBT says:
I wonder if they included any Bismarck’s?
Quote
December 16, 2009, 5:39 pmMike McDougal says:
I’m going to add donuts to my bag of tricks.
Quote
December 16, 2009, 5:51 pmAlyssa says:
The only thing left is to get the 9th circuit to enjoin all Sierra Club activities for violating the Administrative Procedures Act.
Quote
December 16, 2009, 5:53 pmjccamp says:
Good for a laugh, I suppose, but in hindsight, a waste of good doughnuts.
Quote
December 16, 2009, 6:09 pmjosh says:
Wow. Hyperbole, anyone?
Quote
December 16, 2009, 6:20 pmrj says:
You can buy a lot of banners with the ExxonMobil and Chevron poured into CFACT (for fairness, Exxon stopped funding it, but not before dumping a cool $500k into the effort).
Just FYI.
Quote
December 16, 2009, 7:04 pmKirk Parker says:
You may not like CFACT, but can’t deny they are kinder and gentler than the French.
Quote
December 16, 2009, 7:37 pmDNJ says:
As a New Zealander, I certainly would not deny that. It remains a bitter irony that the only terrorist attack in our nation’s history was perpetrated by agents of a supposedly friendly government.
Quote
December 16, 2009, 8:00 pmPeteP says:
I was expecting to see the UN building with a sign on it.
Quote
December 16, 2009, 8:01 pmrpt says:
Greenpeace is the world’s most unethical corporation?
Quote
December 16, 2009, 10:33 pmArthurKirkland says:
He didn’t say the most unethical corporation; he said “one of the world’s most unethical corporations.” Any reasonable person would leave room for Blackwater, KBR and tobacco companies, and we should not presume the author to be unreasonable.
Quote
December 16, 2009, 11:33 pmM. Gross says:
I’m afraid the old “ExxonMobil gave them money” ad hominem lost what little credibility it had in the eyes of the public some time ago.
Quote
December 16, 2009, 11:36 pmrpt says:
Indeed, the civilians killed in Iraq by Greenpeace, the area of the oceans polluted by the Greenpeace ships, and the millions killed by GP’s secondhand exhaust, dwarfs the record of any other corporate villain.
Quote
December 17, 2009, 12:11 amArthurKirkland says:
Yeah, there has been progress on that front . . . but some people still demonize tobacco industry-funded medical research.
Quote
December 17, 2009, 12:42 amjccamp says:
I’m already scrambling back to the “Who are you?” threads...so helpful.
Quote
December 17, 2009, 8:29 amHow to get the word out about your product in trade shows | Sacramento Used Cars says:
[...] The Volokh Conspiracy » Blog Archive » Daring activists hang … [...]
AndyinNc says:
Nothing says social justice like a corporate-sponsored propaganda ploy!
Quote
December 17, 2009, 10:23 amNM says:
Wow. I just started reading this blog, and was enjoying it, but this post makes me question the intellectual honesty of its writers. Is this Kopel fellow just an oddball, or do the writers generally use such heavy ideological spin? Or maybe I’m being too literal-minded? If this is humor, I apologize for being dense.
Quote
December 17, 2009, 11:16 amTweets that mention The Volokh Conspiracy » Blog Archive » Daring activists hang banners on the property of one of the world’s most unethical corporations -- Topsy.com says:
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by PostRank – Law, Eugene Volokh. Eugene Volokh said: Daring activists hang banners on the property of one of the world’s most unethical corporations: Pictures and d.. http://bit.ly/4qW5An [...]
Dotar Sojat says:
I like the French solution.
Quote
December 17, 2009, 12:47 pmbob says:
If Mr. Kopel ever had any credibility, he would have lost it with this post.
Quote
December 17, 2009, 2:03 pmDaring activists hang banners on the property of one of the world’s most unethical corporations | Liberal Whoppers says:
[...] rest is here: Daring activists hang banners on the property of one of the world’s most unethical corporations Share this [...]