It seems that everyone’s against “judicial activism,” but what does it mean? Does labeling a judge or decision “activist” indicate anything more than disagreement with the outcome? Is it fair to label a judge or judicial nominee “activist”? The Federalist Society has just posted a podcast debate on these questions featuring our own Randy Barnett, Pamela Karlan, Ed Whelan, and Erwin Chemerinsky. John Eastman moderates.