Libertarian critiques of cost-benefit analysis

I’m looking for critiques of regulatory cost-benefit analysis from a libertarian perspective. (Not just yours that you might think up, but articles or books.) Any suggestions?

What also might count: A critique of neoclassical economics from a libertarian perspective, for instance along the lines of “people think this perspective is all free-market but it’s not necessarily, and if you’re into natural rights you should think twice before going there.” Such critiques could continue “… and therefore you should go Austrian,” or “… and therefore you should use moral arguments exclusively,” or what have you.

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes