This announcement has just been posted at Opinio Juris, the international law professor blog (where I also blog). As someone who has posted frequently here and at Instapundit in the last couple of weeks about the importance of a senior international and foreign relations lawyer giving a statement of the US legal view of the OBL attack, I welcome this greatly and thank Legal Adviser Koh for doing it. Needless to say, it is an honor for OJ to host Legal Adviser Koh’s statement – and tells us all something important about the shifting nature of communications that he would agree to discuss something so momentous on a blog (and following on a tradition that began with his predecessor, John Bellinger, also guest posting at OJ).
So: Opinio Juris, Thursday, not sure what time the statement will go up. From Peggy McGuinness at Opinio Juris:
As discussions over the legality of the May 1 killing of Osama Bin Laden by U.S. forces heated up and international law and law of war experts provided a range of potential arguments for and against the lawfulness of U.S. action, we thought it would help public discussion to present the official U.S. position on the legal dimensions of the raid and killing. We are delighted to announce that the Legal Adviser to the U.S. State Department, Harold Hongju Koh, has accepted our invitation to address these issues and that he will be guest blogging with us tomorrow, May 19.
As many of our regular readers know, Koh came to the position of Legal Adviser in 2009 with a wealth of experience and deep expertise as a leading scholar in international law, a former Assistant Secretary of State for Human Rights, Democracy and Labor, and Dean of the Yale Law School. We are honored to host him on Opinio Juris and look forward to what is sure to be a lively follow up discussion here and elsewhere. I should note that Koh’s predecessor, John Bellinger, guest blogged with Opinio Juris in 2007, to address a range of questions relating to the U.S. legal policies on detention and counter-terrorism and the power of the president to interpret international law. The opportunity to hear from the current Legal Adviser continues an important tradition of dialogue between government lawyers, the academy, and the general public. It also represents the kind of transparency of legal policy necessary to effective and accountable governance in these challenging times.