The Volokh Conspiracy

"Libertarian" Constitutional Quote of the Day V:
Who wrote:
To the Constitution of the United States the term SOVEREIGN, is totally unknown. There is but one place where it could have been used with propriety. But, even in that place it would not, perhaps, have comported with the delicacy of those, who ordained and established that Constitution. They might have announced themselves “SOVEREIGN” people of the United States: But serenely conscious of the fact, they avoided the ostentatious declaration.

Having thus avowed my disapprobation of the purposes, for which the terms, State and sovereign, are frequently used, and of the object, to which the application of the last of them is almost universally made; it is now proper that I should disclose the meaning, which I assign to both, and the application, which I make of the latter. In doing this, I shall have occasion incidently to evince, how true it is, that States and Governments were made for man; and, at the same time, how true it is, that his creatures and servants have first deceived, next vilified, and, at last, oppressed their master and maker.
(A) James Madison
(B) Thomas Jefferson
(C) James Wilson
(D) Lysander Spooner
(E) Herbert Spencer

(civil comments only please) For answer click "show"


Mitchell Freedman (mail) (www):
Randy,

Can't one say the outcome of the case was pro-federal government, in that the decision required Georgia to submit to federal jurisdiction in a lawsuit filed by an individual? In other words, how different is it than the 14th Amendment in its view that a citizen of "the" United States has rights against an individual State when it violates due process or equal protection of the laws?

All of this gets awfully murky for those looking for a pro-libertarian position. Also, I find it interesting that the holding of the case you cited was, a few years later, abrogated by the 11th Amendment, if I read your link correctly.
5.26.2006 10:45am