A few months ago I read an article by Prof. Andy Leipold called Why are Federal Judges so Acquittal Prone?, and found it very interesting, so I invited Andy to join us for a week to post about his findings.
Andy is an accomplished criminal law scholar, and Professor and Co-Director of the Program in Criminal Law and Procedure at the University of Illinois College of Law. I hope you find his observations as intriguing and eye-opening as I did.
Related Posts (on one page):
"Federal criminal defendants almost always prefer a jury trial to a bench trial, but it is unclear why. Statistically, federal judges are significantly more likely to acquit than a jury is - over a recent 14 year period, for example, the jury trial conviction rate was 84%, while the bench conviction rate was a mere 55%."
At least some of this phenomenon is due to the strategic decisions of defense lawyers.
There is a saying among public defenders that their job is to win bench trials and lose jury trials. That is, they take their best cases to bench trials, because they trust judges to recognize reasonable doubt. They opt for jury trials in hopeless cases, because lightening might strike.
To put it less charitably, it's a way for cowardly prosecutors to dump responsibility on the judge.