A Cartoon About Me:
Of course I am flattered by the attention, even if the lawyer/cartoonist either misunderstood or chose to misrepresent my views. (Now if only I could get Chris Muir to do a strip . . . )
Features
Stuff from us
Academic Legal Writing: personalized bookplates
Sources on the Second Amendment
That would dramatically improve about half of the briefs that I read.
Anyone can misrepresent me all they want if I get a cartoon
The political bias of that comic is obvious - ignoring the millions upon millions being spent to prove Global Warming, and concentrating on the thousands being spent on refuting it. Maybe it is actually occurring, but it is unlikely that we will know for sure in the near future simply because almost all of the research funding is going to prove its existance, and a mere pittance going to refute it. And even that pittance is subject to attack.
Not to mention 600 dpi, pdf format, uphloaded to one site and downloaded from other and, at least locally, any order you want granted emailed to the judge's own email address in WordPerfect format. The District Court is perhaps the only legal shop in town that still uses WP. I like it better than Word, but it stopped supporting my Mac platform about ten years ago, and its files are not cross-platform.
Adler is totally bald and lectures while dressed in a red mesh tank top.
(I agree--it is sorta cool that someone did a cartoon on him -- but (1)it's rough enough to where I have to take his word that it's about him and (2) I can't see where it has wit, satire, or humor about it. But that's life. When last I saw him, Oliphant was amusing, Doonesbury was not amusing but sometimes interesting, and the local political cartoonist was at a high school level. I imagine the ability both to draw and to see the foibles of humanity is rare. The WaPo got by for decades on Herblock, who had neither ability nor insight. Even when I agreed with his message, I thought the manner of expression remarkably inept.)
http://ifoughtthelaw.cementhorizon.com/comic/bfl018.html
not that there's not that there aren't great jokes about obama and clinton (i imagine "the audacity of hos" as clinton's autobiography), even funny jokes about obama's cocaine use.
but the point is to make a funny, right?
No they don't.
As opposed, um, to caring enough to post about a cartoon response to some blog entry, right? (Or, um, to care enough to post about someone who posts about someone who would care enough to ... whoa, way too meta.)