Judge Kozinski and the Blogosphere:
Professor Eric Goldman recently hosted a talk with Judge Kozinski of the Ninth Circuit that touched on Kozinski's views about blogs:
Hat tip: Howard, naturally.
ERIC GOLDMAN: So but what about blogs? . . .Listening to the tape, it sounds like Judge Kozinski is exaggerating a bit for comic effect. Still, I guess his views have changed a lot since his campaign to be elected the #1 Male Superhottie of the Federal Judiciary.
JUDGE ALEX KOZINSKI: I hate them, hateful things.
ERIC GOLDMAN: Why do you hate blogs? . . . .
JUDGE ALEX KOZINSKI: I just think it's so self-indulgent, you know. "Oh, I'm so proud of what I'm saying, I think the world instantly wants to know what I'm thinking today." People wake up thinking, . . . . "I wonder what great thoughts have come into his mind this morning that I can feel myself edified by. I can't really have breakfast — really enjoy my day — until I hear the great thoughts of Howard Bashman!"
I don't think so. I go for months without ever knowing what Howard has to say. So I don't know. I find it sort of self-indulgent. And I find it grandiloquent. And I find it annoying, particularly if I'm in an audience and people are sitting there typing in their computers.
Hat tip: Howard, naturally.
My only quibble is the part about Howard. I don't really think that Howard spends much time sharing his "great thoughts" but instead just keeps us "self-indulgent" types informed with great links to the news of the day.
Silly.
Bashman's How Appealling blog is mostly links with minimal commentary, yes, but his appellate columns are also posted on a "blog" (in name if not form). Maybe Judge Kozinski was thinking of those types of pieces? I know he and Bashman were on opposite sides of Rule 32.1, which Bashman has written about there.
I wonder whether Kozinski feels this way because he is now being upstaged by bloggers, because Kozinski now no longer has a monopoly on making self-indulgent and grandiloquent statements himself.