The Volokh Conspiracy

Captain Copyright Has Hung Up His Cape:

Last year, I blogged about Captain Copyright, a Canadian site aimed at conveying a pro-copyright message to children, and at being used by schoolteachers for that purpose. I faulted the site for having a "legal notice" that seemed to misrepresent copyright law.

Reader Bill Poser, who found the Captain Copyright site through the earlier post, now reports that Captain Copyright has given up the fight. The site now contains the following text:

In August 2006, we took the Captain Copyright website offline so that we could revise its content in response to the criticisms the site had received. We worked extensively on revising the original lessons and we commissioned someone with expertise on the creation of educational materials to prepare new lessons on the Creative Commons, fair dealing and the public domain. We also sought the assistance of an advisory panel of educators and copyright experts with a range of perspectives on copyright, and every lesson was submitted to them for rigorous review. We then incorporated their revisions to the lessons so that they could be thoroughly teacher-tested.

Despite the significant progress we made on addressing the concerns raised about the original Captain Copyright initiative, as well as the positive feedback and requests for literally hundreds of lesson kits from teachers and librarians, we have come to the conclusion that the current climate around copyright issues will not allow a project like this one to be successful. It is difficult for organizations to reach agreement on copyright issues at this time and we know that, in the face of continuing opposition, the materials will not be used in the classroom. Under these circumstances there is no point in our continuing to work on this project.

We began this project because teachers told us that copyright had become too much a part of their students’ daily lives for it not to be taught in the classroom, and they told us they needed a teaching tool to help them do it. We still believe that creating such a tool is important, but we also now believe that no single organization can take the lead on such an initiative. We truly hope that there will come a time when the copyright community -– including educators, librarians and copyright collectives — can work together to provide a unbiased teaching tool that provides teachers and students with a balanced view of copyright.

UPDATE: Michael Geist also blogged about this earlier this year.

FantasiaWHT:
Before I became a law student I was a high school music teacher. I struggled myself to put together a decent lesson plan on copyright. I could've used something like that.
7.30.2007 2:32pm
Pete Guither (mail) (www):
So in other words, we expect young people to follow copyright law even though legal experts have no idea what it is.
7.30.2007 2:38pm
FantasiaWHT:

So in other words, we expect young people to follow copyright law even though legal experts have no idea what it is.


By that logic, we shouldn't expect people to obey any law that there is substantial disagreement about in the legal community.
7.30.2007 2:50pm
Guest101:
"By that logic, we shouldn't expect people to obey any law that there is substantial disagreement about in the legal community."
Isn't that the Rule of Lenity? (Not exactly, but pretty close to Pete's initial point rather than your characterization of it).
7.30.2007 3:04pm
FantasiaWHT:
If the circuits split over the interpretation of a law and the SC hasn't resolved it, should people be able to disregard that law?

I wouldn't characterize the status of copyright law as "legal experts have no idea what it is" but rather "legal experts disagree about what it is"
7.30.2007 3:12pm
PatHMV (mail) (www):
That's a cop-out explanation. The truth is that this non-profit which represents "creator and publisher organizations across Canada" learned that schools will not parrot their propaganda to school children. The areas of real dispute over copyright, such as what constitute "fair use" (the American doctrine; I presume Canada has a similar provision), are relatively limited. One can indeed teach high school students at least what the areas of dispute are relatively easily, if one wants to present all sides fairly.

What the "Captain Copyright" creators are really saying is: "teaching young people what the law really is would not serve the corporate interests we represent."
7.30.2007 3:16pm
bittern (mail):
Nicely stated, HMV. I'd missed the original post. Very funny, EV.
7.30.2007 3:35pm
Fub:
Captain Copyright sez:
Despite the significant progress we made on addressing the concerns raised about the original Captain Copyright initiative, as well as the positive feedback and requests for literally hundreds of lesson kits from teachers and librarians, we have come to the conclusion that the current climate around copyright issues will not allow a project like this one to be successful.
In other news, Captain Raindance sez:
Despite literally hundreds of reports from people who think they saw a dewdrop somewhere early one morning or another, we have come to the conclusion that the climate around rain dancing will not allow a project like this one to be successful.
7.30.2007 3:53pm