Fed Cuts Discount Window Rate.

At about 8:15 ET Friday morning, the Federal Reserve reduced the discount window rate, which was 6.25% (a 1% penalty over the stated 5.25% Fed Funds rate) to 5.75% (a .5% penalty) for borrowing at the discount window. The most heartening thing about it is the reversal in worrying much more about the economy:

Financial market conditions have deteriorated, and tighter credit conditions and increased uncertainty have the potential to restrain economic growth going forward. In these circumstances, although recent data suggest that the economy has continued to expand at a moderate pace, the Federal Open Market Committee judges that the downside risks to growth have increased appreciably. The Committee is monitoring the situation and is prepared to act as needed to mitigate the adverse effects on the economy arising from the disruptions in financial markets.

Oddly, Bill Poole, who was saying just a couple days ago that there was no reason for a cut, is not listed as voting either for or against today's Fed move. It was just reported on CNBC that he had a scheduling conflict.

dearieme:
"he had a scheduling conflict": wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
8.17.2007 10:47am
yeehs (mail):
BORING!
I wonder what it's like to blog at the Volokh Conspiracy and find all your posts shoved down to the bottom by a series like this one.
8.17.2007 11:46am
stormy (mail):
But, won't that increase inflation?
8.17.2007 12:18pm
SenatorX (mail):
Bailouts for all my friends!! You stinky SUBPRIME homeowners, so sorry. The fed increase inflation? LMAO

What a joke. I guess the "Calamity" happened a bit quicker than expected? All just a confidence game. Any "rally" by the banks or lenders is to be looked at with scorn. Really they fed should be sued by anyone who is short. Who are they to say what the cost of money should be? Sucks to be a foreign holder of the dollar. Better depeg too before its too late! This manipulation will PROLONG the problems.

Are there really pro-fed libertarians? I would love to hear that justification.
8.17.2007 12:51pm
TheSnakeGuy (mail):
Didn't Poole say they wouldn't cut the fed funds rate, which they didn't. They cut the discount rate. They still may have to cut the fed funds rate before the next meeting. This really wasn't what the market was hoping for.
8.17.2007 12:59pm
happylee:
And so the business cycle revs up for final fall.
8.17.2007 2:59pm
James Lindgren (mail):
SenatorX:

There was speculation on CNBC that Bernanke announced this just before the market open to punish the short index option traders, whose positions expired at the OPENING price. One commentator suggested that something similar was done in 1998 by Greenspan to punish the shorts.
8.17.2007 3:31pm
t (mail):
Poole is ST louis Fed branch bank head, not a member of Open Market Committee; thus he has no vote. CNBC is 98% nonsense and this "scheduling conflict" is more of the same.
8.17.2007 4:47pm
James Lindgren (mail):
t:

Are you sure?

Poole is listed as an "alternate member" in the minutes of 2006 meetings and as a member of the FOMC in the minutes of all 2007 meetings. Thus, it appears that Poole is a 2007 member (and the Dallas fed chief was subbing for him in the latest decision).

Also, it may be just a coincidence, but every other Federal Reserve but St. Louis lowered its discount rate immediately, while the St. Louis Fed's lowering of the rate takes effect on Monday.

SEE: <link>

Jim Lindgren
8.17.2007 6:02pm
t (mail):
ok, I'm wrong, the deal with Poole is that he's on the FOMC this year (rotates through the non-NY regional banks, I didnt recall that it is St Louis's year), but he's not a Fed Governor, of whom there are 7.
guess it is interesting he either abstained or did not participate. this action is not inconsistent with what he was saying the other day about no rate cut prior to next meeting, but then again for him to vote for this more symbolic than substantial action would probably have been even more confusing to market, potentially inducing more panic and having the opposite of the desired effect.
8.17.2007 6:47pm
t (mail):
I stand by my CNBC dig, it's virtually non-stop drivel.
8.17.2007 7:07pm
mike1234 (mail):
Someone knew yesterday and tipped off the pros. Very high volume in financials starting yesterday afternoon, getting real big volume at close.

The SEC should investigate ... I guess if they knew that was their job, they'd investigate.
8.17.2007 10:00pm
Bill Dyer (mail) (www):
Jim: I thought of your posts as soon as I heard this news. I'm ready to give you credit (so to speak) for the change!
8.18.2007 4:21am
JRL:
The government should no more be setting the price for money that it should for cheese or blue jeans.
8.18.2007 4:59pm
SpenceB:
... and what was the reason again in the Constitution for establishing a national bank-- and central economic planning &
control committee ??
8.18.2007 6:14pm