The Case for Giving Porkbarrel Projects to Dead Members of Congress:

The good that congressmen do is oft interred with their bones, but the pork they sponsor lives on after their deaths. In this post, Don Surber notes that three members of Congress have died so far this year, but that did not prevent the wasteful porkbarrel projects they lobbied for for their districts from passing (hat tip: Instapundit). However, just as it is best to allow only dead farmers to collect government subsidies for not farming, it would also be good to allocate as much of our porkbarrel spending as possible to the districts of dead congressmen. If only dead congressmen were allowed to sponsor pork in their districts, there might be a whole lot less of it.

Related Posts (on one page):

  1. Why Transparency Doesn't Prevent Pork:
  2. The Case for Giving Porkbarrel Projects to Dead Members of Congress:
RMCACE (mail):
...or less congressmen.
8.17.2007 5:49pm
Crunchy Frog:
...which may be the whole point of the exercise.
8.17.2007 6:00pm
John Burgess (mail) (www):
That's an idea I'd like to see my tax dollars behind!


Pork for the Posthumous!
8.17.2007 6:56pm
Shelby (mail):
Alternatively, it would be interesting to see how many Congresscritters are willing to die to get pork to their constituents.

This should be encouraged.
8.17.2007 9:05pm
David M. Nieporent (www):
The only good Congressman is a dead Congressman?
8.17.2007 9:20pm
DiverDan (mail):
If the Congressman is embalmed, does the Pork become Ham?
8.18.2007 1:02am
Cornellian (mail):
I will relax my anti-pork stance to the extent of allowing each member of Congress one earmark upon the occasion of their death, not to exceed 0.1% of the tax revenues provided to the federal government by the citizens of his or her state in the year the earmark is granted.
8.22.2007 2:38pm