The Volokh Conspiracy

David A. Tomlinson, R.I.P.:

On Tuesday, David A. Tomlinson passed away. For three decades, David had been the President of the National Firearms Association of Canada and an outstanding advocate of the rights of law-abiding Canadian firearms owners. I had the privilege of meeting David several times, and found him to be a true gentleman, and a gentle man. Canada has always had more gun controls than the United States, but the Canadian gun debate changed dramatically in the 1990s, when the Liberal government initiated a Kulturkampf against gun owners, aiming to eliminate the "masculine" culture which gun owners supposedly embodied. No one in Canada was more important in leading the resistance than David Tomlinson.

Although the situation of gun ownership in Canada is still precarious, there is a chance that Canada's rural culture of hunting and guns may survive. The corruption and enormous cost over-runs of the failed registry for long guns played a major role in the defeat of the Liberals by the anti-registration Conservatives in the latest Canadian election, in which Tomlinson worked very hard to mobilize citizen activists to defend their rights. He is a great example of how one man can make a difference.

The National Firearms Association website has a tribute to David. Below are some thoughts about David from his friend Cindy Lightheart:

Nathan_M (mail):
According to an opinion poll from 2006 (when the Conservative government introduced legislation to abolish the gun registry), 67% of Canadians supported the gun registry, despite the Liberals' disastrously incompotent implementation of it. Even a majority of people in Alberta, the phttp://volokh.com/posts/1190412426.shtml
The Volokh Conspiracy - David A. Tomlinson, R.I.P.:rovince most opposed to gun control, favoured keeping it.

All of which is to say I don't think it is correct to think the gun registry played a major role in the Liberal defeat. To the extent it hurt the Liberals, it would only have been in their implementation of it, and not the idea. On guns, like every other controversial social issue from abortion to gay marriage, the Liberal party is not involved in any sort of Kulturkampf, but instead spinelessly attempts to reflect mainstream Canadian opinion. And, for better or worse, gun control is enormously popular in Canada.
9.21.2007 10:15pm
Nathan_M (mail):
Yikes, I don't know what happened to that last post. Anyway, the link in the middle of the word "province" was supposed to be to http://tinyurl.com/yvol89, which is a newspaper article discussing the survey I mentioned.
9.21.2007 10:18pm
Nimrod45 (mail):
Sadly, the questions asked in the vast majority of such "polls" are heavilly biased against gun ownership to begin with - there's no way you can get a truly unbiased picture. Professor Gary Mauser conducted a study on this titled "Canadian Attitudes Toward Gun Control: The Real Story". He shows that most people have no idea what the existing gun laws were, and when blythely asked "Do you support stricter gun control", they robotically say "yes". But, when confronted with some basic facts about "gun control", especially the cost, they are much less willing to buy into it.

I guess that's why they're called "opinion" polls, and not "fact" polls...
9.22.2007 9:50am
gray (mail):
Stlll, for reasons good and bad, and from a more or less informed perspective the fact remains that gun control is broadly popular in Canada. The last iteration of control finally stirred rural Canada to protest somewhat but as noted above rurals Canada's only leverage with the rest of Canada was about how incompetently the programme was administered.
9.22.2007 12:55pm
Tony Tutins (mail):
The thing that surprises me most about Canadian gun licensing is that you need your wife's and/or (recent) ex-wife's permission to own a gun. Spousal homicide must be rampant in Canada.
9.22.2007 2:23pm
Mac (mail):
Tony,

Is that not unequal in the extreme or do they never have a case of a wife or ex-wife shooting her husband?

In PC Canada, you would think they would have it work both ways just to give the appearance of equal treatment, if nothing else.
9.23.2007 3:39pm
Tony Tutins (mail):
Mac, sorry I misrepresented the term as "wife." The form requires the signature of your present and recent ex- "conjugal partner." Alternatively, if the form is submitted without their signatures, they will contact them to let them know you are arming yourself.
9.23.2007 10:15pm