The Volokh Conspiracy

Media Coverage of Rachel Corrie:

My latest media analysis article for the Saturday Rocky Mountain News/Denver Post looks at coverage of the Denver opening of the play My Name is Rachel Corrie. BTW, although my article is critical of the coverage, I think that most of the time Denver Post theater critic John Moore does excellent work.

liberty (mail) (www):
I think thats a bad link


[DK: Thanks. I just fixed it.}
10.6.2007 7:11pm
neurodoc:
Good summary of the facts surrounding this misguided young woman's death.



10.6.2007 9:29pm
neurodoc:
PS: Can anyone tell me why I am unable to create a link by hitting "link" and pasteing the webpage address into the box that appears? I did that for both the Rocky Mountain piece by Kopel and for the Denver Post one by Moore, but neither came through as links or anything at all in the post above. What am I doing wrong?
10.6.2007 9:33pm
Anonymo the Anonymous:
Aside from the substance, isn't "My Name Is _______" approximately the laziest possible title for anything?
10.6.2007 9:52pm
Grover Gardner (mail):
"Aside from the substance, isn't 'My Name Is _______' approximately the laziest possible title for anything?"

I guess it would be, if you think "Call me Ishmael" is the weakest opening line in all of literature. ;-)
10.6.2007 10:27pm
neurodoc:
Aside from the substance...
What, pray tell, do you think is the "substance" in this tendentious play based on the words of a very misguided young woman who died in the service of an ignoble cause? More than might be found in a play based on the words of the very misguided young man Adam, "the American," Gadahn who at this time still lives, speaks, and fights for another ignoble cause?
10.6.2007 10:27pm
ScottVA:
Link still doesn't work--it's got an extra "%22" after the ".html" part of the link--removing that made the link work for me. (feel free to delete this post)
10.6.2007 10:35pm
ScottVA:
Image: Corrie educating youth

That picture pretty well made up my mind with regards to the credibility question...
10.6.2007 10:42pm
Tony Tutins (mail):
Apparently satyagraha only works when the oppressor is Anglo-Saxon, as in India and America's south.

Though I wholeheartedly support Israel's right to exist, teading human rights watch articles persuades me that the IDF bulldozes houses beyond any reasonable necessity -- the US can detect tunnels without bulldozing houses; the IDF has bulldozed 2500 houses in Gaza over a four-year period, mostly to enlarge the buffer zone. And the IDF has used Palestinians as human shields within the past ten years. There are no clean hands in the Middle East.
10.6.2007 11:20pm
Tony Tutins (mail):
eek: reading.
10.6.2007 11:21pm
liberty (mail) (www):
You know there is a problem with media bias when you have to look to Mother Jones for accurate reporting.
10.7.2007 12:05am
Brian K (mail):
You know there is a problem with media bias when you have to look to Mother Jones for accurate reporting.
So a usually inaccurate source suddenly becomes accurate when it reports what you want to hear? interesting. that's certainly not saying something about the media's bias...
10.7.2007 12:47am
Bill Poser (mail) (www):
Another sign of the less than objective stance of the ISM is its reference to PLO terrorists as the "resistance", as if they were like the maquis or the fighters of the Warsaw Ghetto.
10.7.2007 12:49am
Eli Rabett (www):
Try My Name is Aram
10.7.2007 1:39am
BGates (www):
Apparently satyagraha only works when the oppressor is Anglo-Saxon, as in India and America's south.
You're probably right that nonviolent resistance would not work for the Israelis, as they would be slaughtered by the millions of Muslims who surround them. But it would certainly work for the Palestinians. Pity they can't bring themselves to try it.

BrianK - a usually inaccurate source becomes accurate when it reports facts. Interesting that you would find the conservative desire for fact in the media something to criticize.
10.7.2007 3:01am
arbitraryaardvark (mail) (www):
http://www.rockymountainnews.com
link to article.
10.7.2007 12:36pm
Richard Aubrey (mail):
Some months ago, the Lebanese Army took care of some business in a refugee camp near Beirut.
ISM there? Noop. Anybody at all? Uh-uh.

So the point is made once again. The palis are maintained as stage props and cannon fodder for the Arab and liberal struggle against Israel. If they take gas in some other venue....yawn. As was demonstrated, folks. Don't forget that. There was an opportunity to falsify the hypothesis. Demonstrated. Not theoretical. Demonstrated in the camps near Beirut. Nobody gives a tiny turd for the palis unless they are useful in The Cause.

Hard to believe anybody believes the so-heartfelt concern for the unfortunate palestinians. It's hard to believe those who evince such concern actually believe themselves. In fact, the prudent are pretty sure they don't.
10.8.2007 8:42pm