A lot of advertising uses sexual appeals (not just nice-looking people, but something well beyond that). But it usually doesn't involve people fully dressed is snow gear:

Still, some people are up in arms, according to Consumerist:
A Target billboard depicting a woman spreadeagled over a Target logo with her vagina centered squarely on the bullseye has some parents and feminists all riled up. One of them, Amy from ShapingYouth.org, contacted Target to see if they realized, you know, that their ad had a woman's crotch centered on a bullseye.
Advice Goddess Amy Alkon has, I think, the better view: People dressed in snowgear who are in that position are usually making snow angels (or, in rare instances, doing a highly bowdlerized version of da Vinci's Vitruvian Man), not preparing for sex or showing off their vaginas.
Of course, we're all free to think that "when correctly viewed, everything is lewd," and titter at whatever we find titterable. But making a fuss about how vile these ads are says more about the fussmaker than about the ads.
This, of course, brings up this old chestnut:
A man goes to a psychiatrist. The psychiatrist shows him an ink blot and asks him what he sees. "A man and a woman having sex," the patient says.
The psychiatrist shows him another ink blot. "That's a man and two women having sex," the patient says.
The psychiatrist shows him another ink blot. "That's two men and a woman having sex," the patient says.
The psychiatrist says, "I'm afraid you're excessively obsessed with sex."
"Me!?," says the patient. "You're the one who's showing me the dirty pictures!"
Aren't femnazis always going on and on about the vagina?
What about the Vagina Monologues? Don't kids have to endure that nonsense?
So this is bad, but that other nonsense is good?
Rather hard to do, since vaginas are internal (prolapsing aside). But it /is/ shorthand for a woman's /external/ genitalia. How did that happen?
Mouth - Throat
Vulva - Vagina
I hope that clears things up.
But WHY?!
Well, OK then. Thanks for planting that thought in my head. I'll be leaving the office now and heading home to MrsHoosier . . .
In short: Men generally aren't that interested in vaginas until the point of entry.
You apparently don't know a damn thing about men.
As for the ad--apparently you don't know advertising either. I can't imagine a teenaged boy, or older, who will not get this not-so-subliminal message.
PoA
I guess I don't know a damn thing about men either, and here I always thought of myself as one, and a manly-man sort of one at that. Now that I "get it", I guess I should stop hanging out at bars and spend spend more time at the Target if I want some nookie.
I have to agree with Eugene, only people with dirty minds to begin with see what you see.
Well, he's actually observing (quite correctly, in fact), that the external genital organs of the female are properly known as the vulva, not the vagina. The battle over the appropriate usage, though, is, at least with respect to common speech, probably lost.
My comment was aimed more at Amy's comment that men don't care about the vagina (or, more properly as we have all learned today, the vulva) until the point of entry, rather than the ad itself.
Sorry, I misunderstood. I do agree with her though, the areas we get aroused by looking at though are the butt, breasts and legs. No one stares at a woman's crotch.
* I'm going to adopt a descriptivist stance in this instance and say that, medical terminology notwithstanding, the term "vagina" is a generally accepted reference to the female reproductive complex in its entirety.
Well, sure. Except that people making snow angels are usually in the snow. I, for one, don't see any snow in this picture.
gregh was obviously never a beer-goggled frat boy in college.
And the Wizard of Oz? There's a dirty old man!
I have it on good authority (not that I would know this personally) that there are entire websites dedicated to pictures of just such things.
In college I could stare at their t*ts and throw up on the carpet with the best of them, thank you very much.
Frylock: Nuh-uhhh... I don't see anything but wood. I mean, it's just woodgrain...
Master Shake: It's right in the butt of the gun. Lookit the butt of the gun.
Frylock: I'm lookin' at the butt of the gun. I don't see nothin' but the gun.
Master Shake: What the hell's the mat - hey! Yo! Choch! Show my dumb friend over here where Gee Whiz is, willya?
Homeless Man: [mumbling] Mehmhmhmhhmmmm... Gee Whiz... you Gee Whiz?
Master Shake: That's gr... yes, thank you! Okay! SHOW HIM. ON. THE. BILL. BOARD!
Homeless Man: [long pause] ME! ME GEE WHIZ!
Master Shake: Ohhhhhhoohohohhhhh... great. 'Nuther whackjob. Hey, Gee Whiz: can you FLY?
Homeless Man: [hysterical screaming] GIMMAHYAMUNNNAAAAAAAAAAYYYYY!
[THUD]
Master Shake: [nonchalantly, as Frylock stares in horror] 'Kay, now that he's gone. Right where his head was, you gotta squint like...
Frylock: [deadpan] I'm outta here. This is bull.
Unfortunately, it took just as much "priming" via suggestion for me to see the "snow angel" as the... I don't even know what to call it. The pose seems totally unerotic to me, but I also don't "get" shoe/foot fetishes, so.
And, um, even after I was told it was a Target ad, I still managed to not see the logo until someone spelled it out on Amy Alkon's blog.
I'm not a visual learner, though. If only the designer could have put a thought bubble above the girl's head, explaining what was going on (and perhaps her desire to go to Target and buy, I don't know, snow gear.) This would solve both my problem and the problem experienced by the feminists in question.
Speaking of which, where did...
Oh, just forget it.
Maybe that's why I'm an engineer who isn't getting any.
As for this advertisement in question, I propose that the Rev. Jeremiah Wright give this ad some kind of an award and then we can spend 3 days debating whether Barack Obama should be required to repudiate it.
Now, if the ad featured a man wearing Calvin Klein's....
I'm pretty sure Eisenhower warned us about this!!
Awesome. Thread victory to Dave N.
Unless, of course, she's got a camel toe.
And there are web sites dedicated to those too!
Sounds about right to me. ;)
I will never think of my car - much less the act of getting into it and driving it - the same way again. Thanks, JustAnotherLALawyer. :p pppptttt
When I worked on a university newspaper we put fake ads in the classifieds like "WANTED 1972 Vulva, must have good body."
After reading your comments, you folks seem entirely normal to me.
Most distressing!
(Not a lawyer)
Why are people getting riled up about this ad and not the hundreds of other ads by Target and other companies, depicting women in revealing clothing/swimsuits/lingerie which are clearly more sexually suggestive, "lewd", etc. than this ad? Shouldn't "Amy from ShapingYouth.org" worry about those ads first?
If I remember my anatomy from back in freshman year the raised bump we can discern through clothing is called the mons pubis or the mons veneris. Directly below the mons is the vulva and its double set of lips. It takes really tight clothing for those to be perceived.
True - I think most men who want to buy women's clothes shop elsewhere.
Well yes and Michelangelo, too. After all, his David is not only nude, but publicly displayed.
Who can doubt that if Michelangelo sculpted "David" today, there'd be battalions of politicians attacking him for creating pornography, corrupting family values, disregarding tradition etc.?
No offense, but that's one of the most clueless things I've read or heard in at least a couple of days.
Just trust me on this: Men are very, very, very interested in vaginas. At all times of day. While awake or asleep. Before "entry," during "entry" and after "entry."
Men are so fixated on crotches, in fact, they can't break the habit of stealing a glance even when it turns out there's no vagina involved, disappointingly.
(From the link.)
Wow. That is more than I ever needed to know.
there is a theory in biology/evolutionary psychology ...
that the whole reason women developed breasts around their mammary glands was as a visual stimulus to men to simulate buttocks cleavage, as man (woman) moved to upright stances.
the human breast is mostly composed of fatty tissue. that's what makes it look good, unless you live in california where silicone/saline is the primary ingredient.
animals on all fours (humans included) have as the primary visual stimulus - THE BUTT . upright women supposedly developed breasts to compensate and give a visual stimulus to men as to what lay below.
if you crop the cleavage area of the breasts and the buttocks cleavage and put them side by side, they look REMARKABLY similar. seriously.
same scientist peeps also get into the full red lips (enhanced by lipstick) as visual stimuli to represent vaginal lips - both getting redder and engorged with blood as sexual excitement arises.
etc. etc. etc
From any indicators I can see, which are few, it might just as well be a young teenage boy with long hair.
Gee, thanks.
I used to be able to read VC without getting horny.
One might even say that men are very, very, very deeply interested in vaginas.
But seriously, folks . . .