The ever-recurring debate over whether academics are unhappy (discussed in my last post) leads me to ask whether there are jobs I would leave academia for if I could get them. There are a few such jobs. But the nature of this list actually underscores the difficulty of finding a job that would be more fun for me than academia:
I. Supreme Court Justice.
In addition to the power and prestige, Supreme Court justices get to deal with interesting and important cases that they choose themselves. Moreover, they have lots of time to write academic books and articles on the side if they want to (as Justices Breyer and Scalia do, among others). Due to a larger staff and smaller case load than other judges have, the justices have plenty of opportunity to pursue outside interests and commitments. I could even continue to blog about legal and political issues if I wanted to (as several lower court judges, such as Richard Posner do). The big caveat here is that even if I weren't already unconfirmable, I couldn't just leave GMU and become a Supreme Court justice right away. I would have to spend the next 20-30 years wooing the politicians who might appoint me and doing all I can to avoid saying anything that might hurt my confirmation chances. And even then, the chances of getting appointed would be a crapshoot at best. On balance, then, it's not really a preferable job to being an academic once I factor in all the sacrifices involved in getting it.
II. Science Fiction or Fantasy Writer.
If I had the talent for it, I'd love to write sci fi or fantasy novels for a living. However, it would only be worth it if I were good enough to be one of the top writers in the field. The hand to mouth existence and tiny reading audience of the average professional fiction writer is not - for me - preferable to life as even a mediocre academic. Moreover, nothing prevents an academic with tenure from writing sci fi or fantasy novels on the side if he wants to. It sure worked out well for J.R.R. Tolkien and C.S. Lewis, among others.
Note to members of my tenure review committee if you are reading this: No I don't plan to actually do this myself I get tenure, if only because of my dismal lack of literary talent. Trust me!
III. Owner of the Boston Red Sox.
I would love to have the opportunity to implement Moneyball principles even more thoroughly than the current, relatively enlightened, Red Sox owners have done. I do have some doubt about whether I have the political and interpersonal skills to manage a large enterprise such as a major league team. But I'm pretty sure I couldn't offend nearly as many people as George Steinbrenner and his sons have done in their time as New York Yankees owners.
Although it's tempting, I probably wouldn't leave academia to be a professional athlete myself - even if I had the physical talent for it. I don't think I could deal with the constant physical pain, and I also don't want to be washed up by the time I'm forty.
Bottom line: Unless some of you generous VC readers want to give me the $816 million or so that it would take to buy the Red Sox, I think I'm going to stay in academia.
UPDATE: I should note that this is a list of jobs that I think would actually be more fun for me than academia. I'm not considering jobs which would be less fun, but that I might take because I could perhaps make more a contribution to the public interest there.
UPDATE #2: To avoid assorted comments on this point, I'm not claiming above that I'm actually qualified right now to be a Supreme Court justice. I think I might have the technical legal knowledge for the job. But I probably don't have the necessary political skills.
Related Posts (on one page):
Ilya, when the libertarian revolution comes, anything will be possible.
But at that point, it would no longer be as much fun to be a Supreme Court Justice, because there wouldn't be any important unconstitutioal laws left to invalidate:).
Sounds good to me. I look forward to being appointed by President Orin Kerr and his filibuster-proof coalition of compliant senators.
Don't you think it is time we released Hillary Clinton from Guantanamo? As Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, I am tempted to write an amicus on her behalf if she desires to file a writ of habeas corpus.
My semi-realistic job away from academe is postman. Walking around instead of sitting on my duff. Talking to people instead of academics. And they're paid better than I am. But those jobs are hard to get, and I've never been called in for an interview.
This year, I've had couple students whose dads are postmen. When I mentioned this interest to them, they immediately said that their dads are very happy in their jobs.
My bad.
I think it's fair to say that being a regular law blogger effectively forfeits any chance anyone might have of becoming a Supreme Court Justice. Not to mention the fact that only 110 people in the history of the United States have had that job.
Come the blogger revolution against the MSM, anything will be possible!
I have a history monograph coming out next spring, if the schedule holds. The most recent book in the series costs "only" $87 in hardback.
But I just saw, for the first time, a Cambridge UP monograph in my area that was selling for $101. So the wall /has/ been breached in modern history.
Dear Senator Compliant:
Unfortunately, the Somin Court does not issue advisory opinions. If it did, we would have to inform the honorable Senator that President Kerr has declared Ms. Clinton to be an "illegal combatant," and we who owe our appointments to his munifecent largesse are in no position to question his exercise of inherent executive authority.
Sincerely yours,
Chief Justice Somin
IS, you are right about the life for most sci-fi/fantasy authors. Most pull down a pittance. I have a friend who has published 6-7 fantasy novels over the years, and he has only received $5k-$25k for each one, even for ones in instantly recognizable milieus, such as the Highlander series. Not nearly enough to quit his day job.
OTOH I do get to pursue my perfect job on the side. I teach people to shoot.
There. Solved it for you.
even for ones in instantly recognizable milieus, such asbecause he writes for the Highlander series."Fixed that for you. Talk about a kiss of death :)
Even your explanation at the end is telling:
UPDATE #2: To avoid assorted comments on this point, I'm not claiming above that I'm actually qualified right now to be a Supreme Court justice. I think I might have the technical legal knowledge for the job. But I probably don't have the necessary political skills.
You say you are not qualified "right now" (implying that one day you will be), and even MOST alarming, you basically contradict yourself saying that you ARE qualified (i.e., endowed with the "technical legal knowledge"), but the political process is all that stands in your way.
Inflated ego, much? I mean, really.
You're really too much. Everyone has dreams, and that's a good thing. Having a blog often means sharing those dreams. Your reaction to this very light-hearted blog entry is nasty, rude, and uncalled for.
Anyway, Ilya, if you are compiling a list of cool jobs you aren't qualified for, how about Pope? Think of the benefits of being infallible.
- Op-ed columnist at the New York Times
- Executive position at the Gates Foundation
- Elected member of Congress
- Poet Laureate
These are only the more ambitious ones. There are lesser things I would probably settle for.
Being an owner is not a job.
Darn right. Get yourself appointed to the Supreme Court and run the Red Sox as a hobby. You can write science fiction as a sideline. Why settle for half the loaf?
It also seems to me that the skills that make one a good sci-fi writer and those that make one a good SC justice are more similar than you might think. Narrative, rhetorical flair, ability to extrapolate social-scientific trends beyond contemporary bounds... Kennedy in Carhart seems very Asimov-esque, btw.... oppression, what is or is not life, regret...
What about a legal mystery/thriller writer? "Write what you know", and all that. And there seems to be a healthy market for such.
Infallibility only applies when the Pope speaks ex cathedra, on matters of faith &morals.
Plus you have to wear the same clothes every day.
And I think the hat would get tiresome.
Being the owner of a professional sports team does give you a lot of opportunity to meddle in the jobs of people you employ.
Nick
kidblue:
A short list of a few (of many) I would prefer:
- Op-ed columnist at the New York Times [what's the pay?]
- Executive position at the Gates Foundation [the pay?]
- Elected member of Congress [love fundraising?]
- Poet Laureate [that's a temp position; normally full time professors get it ... oops]
At that time, Oxbridge dons normally didn't hold the Ph.D. Research was just not part of what they did. If you want a modern analogue, think of a prep school teacher rather than a university professor.
But if you're infallible, you could interpret the Bible and any other relevant documents in such a manner so as to mandate different apparel... like Red Sox hats and jerseys.
1. Reminds me of a famously cynical law professor I had who once said, while discussing the necessity of the legal guild's apprenticeship system better known as law firm associates: "When you graduate from here, about the only job you'll be qualified for is Supreme Court Justice."
2. Careful, Ilya, you'll also have to recuse yourself from any cases seeking to overturn baseball's antitrust exemption. Oh wait... I forgot. The antitrust laws are the first parts of the U.S. Code to put up against the wall and shot after the Revolution...
I'd encourage everyone to check out the site even if they don't have aspirations of being an author. This is the only way I'm able to get good scifi as a law student with a terrible time crunch.
John Grisham seems to do well without any noticeable legal knowledge.