Thanks to the power of the Volokh Conspiracy, I've been able to get my hands on a top-secret synopsis of the pilot show:
Sally finishes her cert pool memos, recommending all "DENY" as usual. At lunch a heated debate breaks out in the law clerk dining room over who should win American Idol. Joe then tackles the briefs in an ERISA case for several hours before the Justice calls and wants to know the name of a tax case he wrote for the Second Circuit back in the late 90s. Then it's on to planning the Thursday law clerk happy hour -- barbeque this time. But will it be as good as the JPS clerks' happy hour last month? And what if it rains?This is obviously pretty exciting stuff, so I assume it wasn't the plot line that kept the show from airing.
(1) a moderate female clerk in a love triangle between an ultra-liberal clerk and an arch-conservative clerk;
(2) said moderate female clerk becoming *teen pregnant* and not knowing whether the father is the liberal or the conservative (happens all the time at One First Street, right?);
(3) the pregnancy kerfuffle playing out against the backdrop of a big abortion case pending before the Justices;
(4) a conniving, pretentious, extremely unlikable Justice who is unabashedly modeled after Antonin Scalia (or, I should said, the popular conception of Antonin Scalia);
(5) a wishy-washy female swing justice who can't decide how to vote on the abortion case because she feels bad about never having had kids because she always put her career first, and who by the way, is also having an affair with her male clerk;
(6) a go-getter clerk who begins every day with a grueling run followed by pills and vodka;
(7) a wise-cracking black libertarian clerk who is somehow able to easily insert himself into the pants of any unsuspecting female simply by befuddling her with unassailable libertarian logic.
Those are a few of the many, many reasons why the show never went anywhere. That and it was a horrible idea for a show in the first place.
not that i think that this means the gov would have a right to force them not to make the show....just that maybe the executive have some standards.
i also don't agree with orin that the shows focus was obviously interesting. Its certainly interesting to Orin, (who-for those who don't know-was a scotus clerk himself)
but, clerking is really an extension of law school. And you don't see shows out there about law school-you see shows about lawyers.
what about med student shows?
med school shows are really doctor shows-because you never see them in class-they are always residents/interns etc...and they usually have lots of discretion they exercise medically to make the character development flow. clerks (as i understand it) have very little discretion.
I couldn't tell either--but as horrible as that show sounds, it beats 99% of the crap the networks have scheduled on prime time.
I'd guessed he was being sarcastic.
This show sounds excellent.
As for me, I went to law school because I read an article about Bishop James Pike (a famous guy in the '50s), who was a lawyer before he went into the ministry. He said he quit the law because he got bored with sitting around discussing whether a sentence needed a comma in a particular place. That sounded like my idea of fun.
Not entirely sure now why I thought that.
Ok, I went to law school because of "the Defenders" which, if I am not dating myself was a really fine show in the late 50's and early 60's. Of course, I have not seen even repeats since then so perhaps the show was not as good as I remember.
I am curious how many people were influenced by any of the law shows over the years and which ones they were.
I’d mention Legally Blond 1&2, but I have hope they won’t make it to TV series. Hollywood portrays the legal profession with the same accuracy as it does car chases and shootouts. How many movies are there about people making a movie? Write what you know. Perry Mason. But I didn’t go to law school. The closest I get is teaching the legal part of the Texas concealed handgun license class. I guess Have Gun, Will Travel et al won out.
The "jump the briefcase" moment was when a client of the firm pulled out a gun during a divorce negotiation and shot his spouse. His lawyers continued to represent him in the murder trial and claimed that attorney-client privilege prevented them from testifying as witnesses. It was wrong on so many levels.
Curiously, I think the VC is approaching a briefcase moment, with Eugene's new obsession with underage sex and the other posters' obsession with Rev. Wright, this site (Kerr excepted) is becoming unreadable. Bring back orinkerr.com!
On the Rev. Wright thing, I think almost all blogs become "unreadable" during election season. This election season's especially bad because there's a law professor running. It'll get worse, then it'll get better. In the meantime, if anyone annoys you in particular, there's always select-a-blogger
Or expel-a-blogger, which however I've never been able to get to work.
Anyway, no one at the VC fails to be worth reading on *some* topics. It's just that some have particularly tiresome hobbyhorses.
I suppose it would be like if I were a VC blogger; most readers would figure out to skip anything with the word "torture" in it ....
Technically there's two law professors running.
Obama was a constitutional law lecturer at Northwestern for several before moving into politics full time. (which I assume is the one you were referring too)
Hillary Clinton taught Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure and something called "The Prisons Project" at the University of Arkansas Law School for two years. (In this same time period Bill Clinton was teaching Admiralty law, International Trade , and I believe constitutional law while attempting to get elected to congress for the first time, which he lost)
Then they both left Arkansas law school when he got elected Attorney General of Arkansas and She took a position at the Rose Law firm.
True, but the *some* topics aren't of interest to everyone, and some bloggers have a greater percentage of tiresome hobbyhorse posts than others.
Or expel-a-blogger, which however I've never been able to get to work
Really? Works fine for me, though it took a few tries. One hint is to drop the capital letters. Also, regardless of whether you're selecting or expelling, Adler is still "jnov"
Now if they did a sitcom instead of a drama, and the writers of The Office took a crack at it, it might not be that bad... disgruntled IT guy messes with Microsoft's autocorrect, opinion goes out to public with "Article III" replaced with "Wu-Tang, m*****f***ing"... I don't know. It could work.
I wish I were making this up.
Yeh, I know. Paper Chase. But wasn't it mostly from the point of view of the students?
This all wrong. It's supposed to be "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" the broadway play featuring hit songs from The Carpenters. Then Hollywood is supposed to adapt the musical for the big screen starring Louis Gossett Jr in a fat suit.
A few years ago Bravo (or some other low-rent cable station) had a reality show where they invited people to submit scripts for sitcom pilots, selected the two best ones, had the two writers produce their respective pilots, and picked the best one, with the idea that the winner would be given the chance to launch the pilot as a series. I began writing a sitcom about law school in order to enter the contest, but failed to finish it because law school isn't funny. Fortunately I don't think anyone actually watched the Bravo show.
I saw the pilot for "In the Shadow of the Law," which was sadly abysmal, even though it had Wash from Firefly playing the Supreme Court clerk.
You can't quite pull a West Wing for SCOTUS, so I'm curious what format people think would succeed. A sitcom might work for something like a small-town elected judge and aspirations of grandeur in a sort of Spin City-esque way, but SCOTUS is HARD. I can't think of a format that wouldn't be incredibly dull or incredibly short-lived. I mean, unless you got Gary Busey as Chief Justice.
Also, one would be the former President (POTUS@SCOTUS) so you could have West Wing style flashbacks coupled with the occasional attempted coup (sweeps; cliff hanger).
Damn, I should have gone into TV.
Or how about this: just keep running famous/popular/hot people through in cameos as the Justices. Who cares if, after a season, you have shown 30 different people as justices, most people don't know how many there are anyway. Every week a surprise Justice!
Call me, we'll have lunch.
did your kids see your comment on a blog post authored by a person they had never met in person before..just curioius.
or are you being sarcastic now?
(yes this is sarcasim)