Vaclav Havel:

Bruce Bawer has a fascinating essay on the life and achievements of Vaclav Havel. For those who may not know, Havel was a playwright who gave up a potential life of privilege as a government-sponsored writer to become a leader of the dissident movement in Communist Czechoslovakia in the 1970s. As a result, he spent years in horrible communist prisons. During that period, he also wrote The Power of the Powerless, in my view the best of all books on life in a totalitarian state.

After the fall of communism in his country in 1989 (thanks in part to the efforts of the dissident movement he helped lead), Havel became the first president of the new democratic Czechoslovakia.

As a general rule, I'm not a big believer in heroes. Many of the people held up as such actually do more harm than good. However, if any currently living person deserves to be admired as a genuine hero who really did make the world better through his courageous acts, Havel does.

Rod Blaine (mail):
Noam Chomsky and Alexander Cockburn don't hold as high a view of Havel:

"... in comparison to the conditions imposed by US tyranny and violence, East Europe under Russian rule was practically a paradise..."

I mean, what would a mere dissident who'd spent years in Czech prisons know about real repression? Pussy! Chompsky has to put up with the US media Manufacturing Consent each day! He survived Bush v Gore and the PATRIOT Act!
6.6.2008 4:53pm
FantasiaWHT:
Now I'm curious what people held up as heroes you think have done more harm than good, Ilya.
6.6.2008 4:57pm
Adam J:
Rod Blaine- In Chomsky's (limited) defense, I think he's referring to the conditions in Iraq, not in the states.
6.6.2008 5:44pm
Ilya Somin:
Now I'm curious what people held up as heroes you think have done more harm than good, Ilya.

Way too many to list here. But Che Guevara - a brutal oppressor and mass murderer worshipped as a hero by college students around the world - is a particularly blatant example.
6.6.2008 5:45pm
Curious Passerby (mail):
And he has an excellent take on the global warming myth.

See here.
6.6.2008 7:09pm
Kazinski:
Adam J:

In Chomsky's (limited) defense, I think he's referring to the conditions in Iraq, not in the states.

Nice try, Chomsky's inanity was written in 1990, shortly after Havel's Feb 21, 1990 address to Congress, which was before even the first Gulf War.


What is it about the Czechs? The current President Vavlav Klaus seems to be head and shoulders above any other head of state in Europe or the rest of world for that matter.
6.6.2008 7:17pm
Michael B (mail):
Havel's mentor, Jan Patocka, is a shining star, a positively luminous figure of the 20th century, both as actor and thinker. No exaggeration.
6.6.2008 7:31pm
Bill Poser (mail) (www):
I don't agree with him, but Chomsky is talking about conditions in US client states, not, for the most part, conditions in the US itself. I'm sure he meant conditions in places like Chile, Argentina, and other Latin American dictatorships.
6.6.2008 9:04pm
Marek:
Curious Passerby: You are confusing the current president (and global warming skeptic), Vaclav Klaus, with his predecessor, Vaclav Havel, who is the subject of this blog post.
6.6.2008 10:01pm
Kazinski:
Bill Poser,
I'm sure Chomsky was comparing our third world client states with Eastern Europe, but that isn't a valid comparison. Let him compare our 1990 era third world client states with the Soviet third world client states I don't think you'll find much of a difference. Or third world countries in general now and then, Zimbabwe, Burma, and the Sudan are hardly US client states, but somehow injustice continues. There has always been lot of injustice in the world, justifying what was done to the Czechs and Havel because of worse horrors elsewhere is justifying injustice.

The Czechs were particularly sympathetic victims because they were a thriving democracy until the French and British sold them down the river in '39, and then no sooner than the war was over a Soviet putsch kept them in chains for another 40 years. Sympathetic except to the likes of Chomsky, Cockburn, and other fellow travelers; Havel and the Czechs made the unforgivable error of casting their lot with capitalism and America.
6.7.2008 12:37am
msimpson (mail) (www):
I agree heartily on the "Power of the Powerless" - the title essay is by itself worth reading again. What's especially striking about the essay is how, through his example of a greengrocer who puts up propaganda posters in his store that he knows to be false because to do otherwise would endanger his livelihood, Havel shows ordinary citizens in the former communist countries to be both victims of oppression and agents of the same. Havel argued that communism would fall apart when the greengrocers decided to stop putting up those posters. Hard to say he wasn't right.
6.7.2008 8:13am
Patrick S. O'Donnell (mail):
OK, what about György (George) Konrád, Adam Michnik, Jiří Gruša, Ladislav Hejdanek, Milan Šimečka, Jacek Jan Kuroń, Rudolf Bahro, Jan Josef Lipski (and all the founders and activists of KOR, the Workers' Defense Committee in Poland)...?
6.7.2008 10:42am
Brian G (mail) (www):

Noam Chomsky and Alexander Cockburn don't hold as high a view of Havel:


If I had never heard of Havel before, I'd be immediately sold on him based on the comment above alone.

Anyone who actually cares what Chomsky says is a real dope. If America is so bad, tell Chomsky to teach at one of the many prestiguous technical schools they have in our enemies' countries, like....hmmm, er, gee whiz, uh...
6.7.2008 6:04pm
Bad (mail) (www):
Don't forget Poland's Lech Wałęsa while you're at it, another of the key players in destroying the Soviet hold on Eastern Europe, and another real hero.
6.8.2008 3:36pm
Patrick S. O'Donnell (mail):
Importantly, Havel's essay is about life in a "Post-totalitarian" society, a distinction with a meaningful difference. And the "The Power of the Powerless" is, strictly speaking, as essay, while the book of that name is a collection of essays by various writers which includes Havel's essay. "The Power of the Powerless" is also reprinted in a collection of Havel's essays edited by Jan Vladislav, Living In Truth (1987).
6.8.2008 9:29pm
Patrick S. O'Donnell (mail):
Erratum: "strictly speaking, an essay...."
6.8.2008 9:30pm
Prufrock765 (mail):
Bawer has long been one of my favorites amongst literary and cultural critics. He hasn't published enough recently.
6.9.2008 12:59pm