I am starting work on a paper on Taiwan/China trade issues. Do readers have suggestions for good books or articles on ways in which trade does/doesn't affect political sovereignty?
I'm not looking for stuff about globalization in general (e.g., the issue raised by much of the French Left that global trade shifts power away from the national government, and towards various multinationals). Rather, I'm looking for material (historical, or present) about bi-lateral trade--especially in the context of bi-lateral situations where one trade partner is much larger, or otherwise more powerful, than the other.
For example, Danish trade with rising, powerful Germany in 1880-1939 does not appear to have harmed Denmark's sovereignty; then when the Nazis did invade in 1940, Denmark's numerous business contacts with Germany helped convince the Germans to allow a limited degree of Danish autonomy during the first years after the conquest. On the other hand, threats to U.S. business interests in Haiti led to a U.S. invasion in 1915 that, arguably, might not have taken place if Haiti had fewer business ties to the U.S. in the first place.
Extra credit for Volokh Law School students who suggest factors, backed by examples, which make extensive bi-lateral trade more/less likely to impair the sovereignty of the smaller partner.
Features
Stuff from us
Academic Legal Writing: personalized bookplates
In Search of Jefferson's Moose
Sources on the Second Amendment
When did you start your own school? Is it affiliated with a university?
Vide: the Saudi-US trade relationship. Do you think that it impairs Saudi sovereignty? US sovereignty? If "yes" to both, which impairment is greater, and why?
The part that's weird, however, is that the Taiwanese are the sophisticated economy.
I wouldn't say the Danes or Haitians are as good. Bismarck's Germany had no big issues of national pride surrounding Danish autonomy -- especially considering the long history of autonomy within the German Empire, by, e.g. Bavaria, and Haiti is culturally very different from the United States.
the trade relationships developed with Spain in Texas and California that produced U.S. sovereignty through economic migrant dominance in those areas;
the 1893 overthrow of the King of Hawaii (by U.S. economic players with short lived and disavowed U.S. military support);
the 1864 used of naval forces of the United States, Great Britain, France, and the Netherlands to enforce trade rights granted in treaties by Japan;
the Bryan-Chamorro treaty with Nicaragua in 1914, through which the United States obtained the right to protect the Panama Canal, and its proprietary rights to any future canal through Nicaragua as well as islands leased from Nicaragua for use as military installations. This treaty also granted to the United States the right to take any measure needed to carry out the treaty’s purposes. This treaty had the effect of making Nicaragua a quasi-protectorate of the United States;
the treaties with the Dominican Republic (in 1907) and with Haiti (in 1915), giving the United States the right to collect and disperse customs income received by these
nations, and to use force to protect customs officials; at least in the case of the Dominican Republic this was in support of a 1904 default on external debts to the U.S.;
the ongoing debate in the U.K. of the impact of the originally trade oriented E.U. treaties which for the first time created de facto judicial review of U.K. legislative action;
the 1917 U.S. military intervention in Cuba in support of the bilateral sugar export trade;
lease arrangements that led to abrogations of full sovereignty, such as the Panama Canal, Hong Kong, Macau, Guantanamo Bay, and Kwantung Leased Territory (first with Japan and later with Russia after the Russo-Japanese War);
the East India Company relationship with the various sovereign states of the Indian subcontinent; and
the impact of economically important expatriate Asian communities in Fiji.
Well, not after the Second War of Schleswig and the annexation of the duchies of Schleswig and Holstein in 1864 . . . There are, by the way, still Danish-speaking enclaves in present-day Germany (Sydslesvik/South Schleswig)with rights guaranteed by international agreement (the Bonn-Copenhagen Declarations) and German law.
My Danish grandmother (born in 1889) hated Germans to her dying day. Danes have long memories, and she lived to the age of 96.
Best,
David Singh Grewal
www.davidgrewal.com
Similarly, the use of force under the pretext of 'trade' to force unequal treaties on China in the dying years of the Qing dynasty.
During the 1980s, Saddam Hussein borrowed lots of money from Kuwait to help fund the Iran-Iraq war. When the bills started coming due, he, as they say, took his tank to the bank.
Not a happy example for the Taiwanese.