Sen. McCain wants the L.A. Times to release the video in its possession of a 2003 farewell dinner for Palestinian activist and one-time PLO ally (and some claim spokesman) Rashid Khalidi. No wonder. In 2005, the New York Sun reported:
In Chicago, the Khalidis founded the Arab American Action Network, and Mona Khalidi served as its president. A big farewell dinner was held in their honor by AAAN with a commemorative book filled with testimonials from their friends and political allies. These included the left wing anti-war group Not In My Name, the Electronic Intifada, and the ex-Weatherman domestic terrorists Bernadine Dohrn and Bill Ayers. (There were also testimonials from then-state Senator Barack Obama [who attended, and spoke at, the dinner] and the mayor of Chicago.)
Internet Wayback tells us that its access to the aaan.org website is blocked by robots.txt [update, not technically "blocked," but Wayback doesn't archive sites that use robots.txt to request that it not do so].
By the way, does the famously open-minded Sen. Obama, who by his own account has learned a great deal from his friendships with anti-American radicals such as Khalidi* and Jeremiah Wright, have any conservative friends (besides, perhaps, Tom Coburn)? Surely, he would have had the chance to make some at Columbia, Harvard Law, the University of Chicago when he taught there, or in the Illinois legislature--though admittedly they could not have helped him much in his early political career, as Wright and Khalidi did.
*His many talks with the Khalidis, Obama said, had been "consistent reminders to me of my own blind spots and my own biases. . . . It's for that reason that I'm hoping that, for many years to come, we continue that conversation — a conversation that is necessary not just around Mona and Rashid's dinner table," but around "this entire world."...
UPDATE: I figured that opening comments on this post was a bad idea, because of the vitriol that any mention on this blog of Obama's dubious associations gets, even when it happens to be all over the news, and even when the only actual implicit criticism in the post, as opposed to just noting that McCain has good reason for wanting a copy of a video that may (or may not) have some embarrassing footage of Obama with Ayers, or Obama sitting silently while speakers launch anti-Israel polemics, or who-knows-what, is "By the way, does the famously open-minded Sen. Obama, who by his own account has learned a great deal from his friendships with anti-American radicals such as Khalidi and Jeremiah Wright, have any conservative friends?" My initial instinct was right, so comments are now closed.
I've already explained, in a much-linked blog post, what I think is the relevance of Obama's ties to various Chicago radicals.
And by the way, my question about Obama's conservative friends wasn't merely rhetorical. It would, in fact, make me feel better about Obama on a variety of levels if it turns out that he has had deep conversations on political and cultural issues with knowledgeable friends "on the right," ranging from libertarians to Christian activists, and not just with a cohort ranging in ideology from Cass Sunstein to Rev. Wright. For one thing, no one on the "right" is likely to be happy with the thought that Obama thinks that Wright, Khalidi, et al., are worth listening to, even when he vehemently disagrees with them, but people of equivalent stature with views on the "right" (say, Richard Epstein at Chicago Law School) are not.
Does it matter to the great man of honor, McCain, that the LA Times got the story only by promising not to release the video?
Does it matter to you that in your eagerness for a McCain win you're jumping on the sleazebag express and shredding your own integrity?
6 more days...
Where is DB going after 6 days?
Don't know about David, but I (as a McCain supporter) don't see Obama as a terrorist or condoning terrorism. I do see a man whose left-liberal worldview and naivete has led and will lead him to ignore, underestimate and misconstrue terrorists and their supporters.
Hopefully he's coming back to Reality World after his extended vacation in Crazy Town.
We are "Outsiders," y'know.
I think Palin would make a fine President of Alaska.
Isn't it convenient to try and say it was US policy to deflect attention from McCain. Was IRI in the business of implementing US policy? And if it was US policy to cultivate moderates, and Khalidi is a moderate endorsed by US policy, then it seems that that fact takes the wind out of the sales of the premise of the original post. Obama is apparently a friend of moderate Palestinian who helped advance the peace process backed by US policy. Or is it only McCain who gets the benefit of that doubt?
Bernstein and Lindgren are becoming awfully shrill water carriers here. Annoying.
The "logic" behind this -- let's call it what it is -- bigotry -- seems to be as follows: Israel took over the Palestinians land; Palestinians don't think they had any right to do that; Palestinians therefore think Israel should give some of the land back or give all Palestinians the vote; Israelis don't want to; Palestinians are therefore anti-Israel; everybody who is anti-Israel is a Muslim radical/terrorist; Muslim radical/terrorists are anti-American; Palestinians are anti-American radicals.
I'm sad to add Volokh to my list of communities who can talk sensibly on every subject but Israel.
Nah ... he was just the chairman of the board of directors.
But DB reassures us of the top management skills that McCain would bring to the White House.
McCain was the Chairman of IRI at the time. Snark: If he didn't approve it, then he's incompetent. If he did, then he supports terrorists.
Besides that, I'm on the boards of two non-profits and I'm not even that involved. I know quite well their funding status for things over about $10,000. I find this defense to be on some weak territory itself.
Not possible. robots.txt lets a website owner say, "I request that these website areas not be indexed." Google, Internet Wayback, et. al., are then free to do what they please with that information.
Doesn't it seem likely that Obama's either (a) a radical himself, or (b) an opportunist, who used his radical buddies to win political support in Chicago politics? If the former, I shudder to think that he'll very likely become the next president. If the latter, it would be nice if someone...oh, I don't know, maybe a journalist at a major news outlet...would at least press the issue and get him to admit that he's no better than all the other cold-blooded politicians who'll say and do anything to get elected. My money's on the latter, though I still think that he's about as far left as you can be without being a certified radical.
The U.S. Funneled money to Khaladi in the 90's with the help of John McCain. Does that make it better that it was U.S. policy? Is it possible to support terrorism even though it is US policy? Why didn't you mention the relationship that Sen. McCain had with this terrorist in your initial post?
Maybe it tells us that conservatives are jerks who don't want to be friends with people who aren't themselves conservatives.
I'm seeing a lot of empirical evidence for that on the internet.