The Volokh Conspiracy

Khalidi Controversy:

Sen. McCain wants the L.A. Times to release the video in its possession of a 2003 farewell dinner for Palestinian activist and one-time PLO ally (and some claim spokesman) Rashid Khalidi. No wonder. In 2005, the New York Sun reported:

In Chicago, the Khalidis founded the Arab American Action Network, and Mona Khalidi served as its president. A big farewell dinner was held in their honor by AAAN with a commemorative book filled with testimonials from their friends and political allies. These included the left wing anti-war group Not In My Name, the Electronic Intifada, and the ex-Weatherman domestic terrorists Bernadine Dohrn and Bill Ayers. (There were also testimonials from then-state Senator Barack Obama [who attended, and spoke at, the dinner] and the mayor of Chicago.)

Internet Wayback tells us that its access to the aaan.org website is blocked by robots.txt [update, not technically "blocked," but Wayback doesn't archive sites that use robots.txt to request that it not do so].

By the way, does the famously open-minded Sen. Obama, who by his own account has learned a great deal from his friendships with anti-American radicals such as Khalidi* and Jeremiah Wright, have any conservative friends (besides, perhaps, Tom Coburn)? Surely, he would have had the chance to make some at Columbia, Harvard Law, the University of Chicago when he taught there, or in the Illinois legislature--though admittedly they could not have helped him much in his early political career, as Wright and Khalidi did.

*His many talks with the Khalidis, Obama said, had been "consistent reminders to me of my own blind spots and my own biases. . . . It's for that reason that I'm hoping that, for many years to come, we continue that conversation — a conversation that is necessary not just around Mona and Rashid's dinner table," but around "this entire world."...

UPDATE: I figured that opening comments on this post was a bad idea, because of the vitriol that any mention on this blog of Obama's dubious associations gets, even when it happens to be all over the news, and even when the only actual implicit criticism in the post, as opposed to just noting that McCain has good reason for wanting a copy of a video that may (or may not) have some embarrassing footage of Obama with Ayers, or Obama sitting silently while speakers launch anti-Israel polemics, or who-knows-what, is "By the way, does the famously open-minded Sen. Obama, who by his own account has learned a great deal from his friendships with anti-American radicals such as Khalidi and Jeremiah Wright, have any conservative friends?" My initial instinct was right, so comments are now closed.

I've already explained, in a much-linked blog post, what I think is the relevance of Obama's ties to various Chicago radicals.

And by the way, my question about Obama's conservative friends wasn't merely rhetorical. It would, in fact, make me feel better about Obama on a variety of levels if it turns out that he has had deep conversations on political and cultural issues with knowledgeable friends "on the right," ranging from libertarians to Christian activists, and not just with a cohort ranging in ideology from Cass Sunstein to Rev. Wright. For one thing, no one on the "right" is likely to be happy with the thought that Obama thinks that Wright, Khalidi, et al., are worth listening to, even when he vehemently disagrees with them, but people of equivalent stature with views on the "right" (say, Richard Epstein at Chicago Law School) are not.

huskerfan:
Ok, how about McCain's connection to him, Professor?
10.29.2008 6:11pm
Eric Muller (www):
David, do you believe that Barack Obama is a terrorist or condones terrorism?
10.29.2008 6:11pm
Ex parte McCardle:
huskerfan is right. What about the hundreds of thousands of dollars McCain's group has given Khalidi? Why does John McCain hate America so much?
10.29.2008 6:14pm
dr:
Hear hear! Why has the Los Angeles Times been covering up this story?!
10.29.2008 6:15pm
byomtov (mail):
Is this the guy that McCain gave a half a million dollar grant?

Does it matter to the great man of honor, McCain, that the LA Times got the story only by promising not to release the video?

Does it matter to you that in your eagerness for a McCain win you're jumping on the sleazebag express and shredding your own integrity?
10.29.2008 6:15pm
Locomotive Breath:
I believe that Barack Obama has associated with numerous people with troubling connections. This is just one of them. How many does Obama get before it's a cause for concern?
10.29.2008 6:16pm
DavidBernstein (mail):
The U.S. funneled money to Khalidi in the 90s, as it was American policy to try to bribe the PLO into peace with Israel, especially by cultivating its "moderates," like Khalidi.
10.29.2008 6:16pm
PC:
Funneling money to "moderates" is acceptable. Talking to "moderates" is unacceptable.

6 more days...
10.29.2008 6:20pm
Anderson (mail):
6 more days...

Where is DB going after 6 days?
10.29.2008 6:21pm
Ex parte McCardle:
Well, that's a great answer, Prof. Bernstein. So it turns out that the United States itself pals around with terrorists. I'm sure that Sarah Palin tomorrow will denounce us all.
10.29.2008 6:21pm
DavidBernstein (mail):
Eric, I have neither stated nor implied that Obama is a terrorist or condones terrorism. Arguably, even Khalidi does not condone terrorism (I've seen conflicting reports). But people are, as we well know, judged to some degree by the company they keep, and it has to tell us SOMETHING if Obama has a lot of radical leftist friends, but no conservative ones.
10.29.2008 6:22pm
Brooks Lyman (mail):
I tried the aaan.org URL and got through OK.

Don't know about David, but I (as a McCain supporter) don't see Obama as a terrorist or condoning terrorism. I do see a man whose left-liberal worldview and naivete has led and will lead him to ignore, underestimate and misconstrue terrorists and their supporters.
10.29.2008 6:22pm
DavidBernstein (mail):
If y'all found a document showing that McCain personally approved the funding, I think you'd be on stronger territory.
10.29.2008 6:23pm
Annoyed:
Please be explicit about why you believe that this information is at all relevant. To echo another poster, do you believe that Obama is a terrorist or condones terrorism? If so, why should anyone take you seriously? If not, why did you post this information?
10.29.2008 6:24pm
PC:
Where is DB going after 6 days?

Hopefully he's coming back to Reality World after his extended vacation in Crazy Town.
10.29.2008 6:24pm
Anderson (mail):
I'm sure that Sarah Palin tomorrow will denounce us all.

We are "Outsiders," y'know.

I think Palin would make a fine President of Alaska.
10.29.2008 6:24pm
runape (mail):
Once again, Bernstein leaves the plantation. Any conservative friends? You'd find quite a number among the current Chicago faculty. You might also consider Brad Berenson (among other conservative HLR colleagues); Chuck Hagel; Colin Powell; Michael McConnell; ... ... ...
10.29.2008 6:24pm
Paper Nuncio:
Once again I come here for intellectual honesty and get partisan silliness that lends no import or substance to the election.

Isn't it convenient to try and say it was US policy to deflect attention from McCain. Was IRI in the business of implementing US policy? And if it was US policy to cultivate moderates, and Khalidi is a moderate endorsed by US policy, then it seems that that fact takes the wind out of the sales of the premise of the original post. Obama is apparently a friend of moderate Palestinian who helped advance the peace process backed by US policy. Or is it only McCain who gets the benefit of that doubt?

Bernstein and Lindgren are becoming awfully shrill water carriers here. Annoying.
10.29.2008 6:24pm
Robert Farrell (mail):
Where is the evidence for your claim Rashid Khalidi is an "anti-American radical"? In point of fact, he isn't. I see this assertion repeated endlessly, apparently for no better reason than the fact that Khalidi is a Palestinian. He's not even a one-stater. There's no evidence he ever worked for the PLO.

The "logic" behind this -- let's call it what it is -- bigotry -- seems to be as follows: Israel took over the Palestinians land; Palestinians don't think they had any right to do that; Palestinians therefore think Israel should give some of the land back or give all Palestinians the vote; Israelis don't want to; Palestinians are therefore anti-Israel; everybody who is anti-Israel is a Muslim radical/terrorist; Muslim radical/terrorists are anti-American; Palestinians are anti-American radicals.

I'm sad to add Volokh to my list of communities who can talk sensibly on every subject but Israel.
10.29.2008 6:25pm
runape (mail):
10.29.2008 6:26pm
DavidBernstein (mail):
But in any event, the point of my post, as opposed to the McCain's campaign use of the issue is (1) it's obvious why the McCainites want to see the video and (2) Obama's defenders, including Obama himself, defend his dubious associates by suggesting that it's not that he's very left-wing, it just that he's a very open-minded guy who likes to hear all perspectives. I'm willing to buy that, and I'd like to believe it since he's likely to be president, but if he's ever been friends with any conservative intellectuals or activists, I haven't seen it reported.
10.29.2008 6:27pm
Anderson (mail):
If y'all found a document showing that McCain personally approved the funding, I think you'd be on stronger territory.

Nah ... he was just the chairman of the board of directors.

But DB reassures us of the top management skills that McCain would bring to the White House.
10.29.2008 6:27pm
Paper Nuncio:

If y'all found a document showing that McCain personally approved the funding, I think you'd be on stronger territory.


McCain was the Chairman of IRI at the time. Snark: If he didn't approve it, then he's incompetent. If he did, then he supports terrorists.

Besides that, I'm on the boards of two non-profits and I'm not even that involved. I know quite well their funding status for things over about $10,000. I find this defense to be on some weak territory itself.
10.29.2008 6:28pm
Robb (mail) (www):

Interestingly enough, Internet Wayback tells us that its access to the aaan.org website is blocked by robots.txt.



Not possible. robots.txt lets a website owner say, "I request that these website areas not be indexed." Google, Internet Wayback, et. al., are then free to do what they please with that information.
10.29.2008 6:28pm
ronnie dobbs (mail):

Eric, I have neither stated nor implied that Obama is a terrorist or condones terrorism. Arguably, even Khalidi does not condone terrorism (I've seen conflicting reports). But people are, as we well know, judged to some degree by the company they keep, and it has to tell us SOMETHING if Obama has a lot of radical leftist friends, but no conservative ones.


Doesn't it seem likely that Obama's either (a) a radical himself, or (b) an opportunist, who used his radical buddies to win political support in Chicago politics? If the former, I shudder to think that he'll very likely become the next president. If the latter, it would be nice if someone...oh, I don't know, maybe a journalist at a major news outlet...would at least press the issue and get him to admit that he's no better than all the other cold-blooded politicians who'll say and do anything to get elected. My money's on the latter, though I still think that he's about as far left as you can be without being a certified radical.
10.29.2008 6:28pm
huskerfan:
Professor,

The U.S. Funneled money to Khaladi in the 90's with the help of John McCain. Does that make it better that it was U.S. policy? Is it possible to support terrorism even though it is US policy? Why didn't you mention the relationship that Sen. McCain had with this terrorist in your initial post?
10.29.2008 6:28pm
Anderson (mail):
it has to tell us SOMETHING if Obama has a lot of radical leftist friends, but no conservative ones.

Maybe it tells us that conservatives are jerks who don't want to be friends with people who aren't themselves conservatives.

I'm seeing a lot of empirical evidence for that on the internet.
10.29.2008 6:29pm