Much as I didn't want Obama to win on ideological grounds, I am nonetheless thrilled that American voters elected the first black president.
I've spent a fair chunk of the last two decades writing about post-Civil War African-American history (in the context of constitutional history, e.g.), a history replete with segregation, lynchings, intimidation, humiliation, exclusion and so forth. I can't tell you how disgusted I am when I read this history, and I'm not sure that those of us who haven't studied the history really understand the pervasiveness and invidiousness of the mistreatment of African Americans. Just imagine the mentality, for example, of people who not only took part in brutal lynchings less than a century ago, but hacked off the victims' body parts and kept them as souveniers, and created picture postcards that highlighted the victims desecrated remains!
And the mistreatment of black Americans crossed ideological lines. As late as the 1930s, President Roosevelt refused to support a federal anti-lynching law, and liberal Democrats had few if any compunctions about intentionally creating massive unemployment among southern African American farmers and industrial workers in pursuit of New Deal goals they considered far more important. Adlai Stevenson, as I recall, ran for the presidency with two separate segregationist running mates in the 1950s! Just forty years ago, the Supreme Court had to force Virginia to allow interracial marriage. Now we see the son of a black African father and white mother carrying Virginia in a presidential election. Amazing!
Prejudice, of course, hasn't disappeared, not will it disappear under an Obama presidency. But all American ethnic groups have faced prejudice, sometimes severe prejudice, and thrived nevertheless.
What was unique about American post-slavery prejudice against African Americans, as opposed to the prejudice against other groups, was that it manifested itself in a system of white supremacy that dictated that blacks always be placed in an inferior position to whites. In the South, this was formalized under the law by Jim Crow statutes, and also enforced by lynchings and "whitecapping" against "uppity" black business owners and others who "didn't know their place."
Things were never quite so bad in the North, but there was still tremendous resistance until relatively recently among whites to, for example, allowing blacks serving in supervisory positions over whites. Until fairly recently, most construction unions blatantly refused to accept African American members, mainly because they did not want to acknowledge equality with them on a social level.
Obama's victory tells us that in case anyone had any doubt, the ideology of white supremacy is over and done with, kaput. Again, while blacks still face a fair amount of prejudice, there's a big difference between prejudice and a widespread ideology among the majority population that members of a particular group must be kept in "their place," by custom, law, and violence. "Their place," in effect, is now all the same positions whites occupy, up to and including the most powerful office in the land.
So congratulations to Senator Obama, and to America.
UPDATE: I posted this by accident before I was quite finished, so the current version is slightly edited.
Related Posts (on one page):
- Three Good Things About Yesterday's Result:
- The Return of Oratory:
- Three Positive Aspects of Obama's Victory:
- The End of White Supremacy:
I do hope that this is the end of the line for individuals such as Sharpton and Jackson. Whatever good they have done, I hope that they are no longer viewed as being needed. And may we move further towards a color-blind America.
Many of the reconstructed former rebel states had laws against interracial marriage on the books and those laws were found conforming with the 14th amendment by those who adopted the amendment.
The supreme court is responsible for a great deal of the divisions found in society today because it has refused to allow majorities to exercise self-government.
"Whenever Congress attempts to restrict this right of the majority to rule in the State it will attempt usurpation, and whenever the majority of loyal citizens surrenders that right into the hands of the minority it surrenders the cardinal principle of representative government.”
--John A. Bingham, July 20, 1866
Don't bet on it. There's just as much of a possibility that if people see that attending a racist church for 20 years means you can be president, it will only encourage more Sharptons in the future.
Exactly how much "white supremacy" was there in this country in the past couple of decades? Besides being the constant boogeyman of the left, white supremacists have been an endangered species for as long as I have been alive. I have met my share of racists, but 80 percent of them were black people I grew up with in NYC. The remaining 20 percent were asians who looked down on non-asians.
I also think you're wrong. The "black leaders" are already talking about how Obama being half white means that racism is still alive and well in this country. And you're kidding yourself if you think Obama is going to support less affirmative action and not more.
Yes, because interracial marriage is such a hot-topic these days. Loving certainly catalyzed a never-ending fight that it continues to be an important factor in politics today.
I've certainly disagreed with you about original intent originalism in the past, but this is just ridiculous. I quite seriously believe you should be ashamed of yourself for that post. The notion that bans on interracial marriage should be acceptable because John Bingham (oddly enough, you never talk about anyone else in Congress who voted for the 14th) thought they were okay is simply repellent. Disgusting. And not the "disgusting" that abortion supporters talk about in polite company, where "reasonable people can disagree on it." It's disgusting in a deeply, perversely racist fashion.
What a horribly bad joke.
1. No one outside David Duke et al publicly supports white supremacy. Many whites do support it privately, but those are mostly confined to backwoods trailer parks. Anyone in the public eye completely avoids anything even remotely supremacist.
2. The related issue of solidarity is also largely verboten, except when it comes to certain approved voting blocs. Then it's OK. (Note: at the link, BHO supports a subtype of white solidarity).
3. Top Obama adviser Prof. Charles Ogletree says 21st-century white America, as a general rule, remains racist towards Blacks, Latinos, and Asians, and racism is likely to persist for decades -- Barack Obama is an exception only because "he happens to be biracial," so that his election will not be proof that whites have moved beyond racism.
4. Watch in wonder as for the next four years BHO's surrogates play the race card every single chance they get in order to push their agenda.
I run across racists from time to time, and for the most part they are lower class whites on the margins of society, most don't vote, and those that do vote democratic. The main reason they are racists is because they feel they have to have someone to look down upon.
I'm a firm believer of original meaning and "not intent."
"oddly enough, you never talk about anyone else in Congress who voted for the 14th"
He was the floor manager of many reconstruction bills AND for some reason the courts love to either quote him directly or quote his words found under the fourteenth's first section! Why can't I quote him?
Somehow, they got a revelation from God that they are people too.
"Bold: Race is socially constructed. He thinks he's black, voters think he's black, racists think he's black, black people think he's black... he's black."
And yet he acts whiter than Tiger Woods.
I'd say he's well on the way to post-racial. Hopefully he can take the rest of us along for the ride.
They would not call themselves "white supremacists" but that's who we're talking about.
White supremacists have carried out some of the worst domestic terrorist attacks in U.S. history. An attack by two white supremacist numbskulls was just recently thwarted by our government. Are Islamic extremists also a "boogeyman"? After all, there aren't very many of them in the U.S. and they haven't carried out a successful attack on U.S. soil in the past seven years.
This being said, Obama appears to have carried about 40% of the vote in many of the Deep South states. In the exit polls, a majority of the 18-24 age bracket in these states voted for Obama. So I agree with Bernstein about just how much of a fringe belief white supremacy has become.
I agree entirely with Prof. Bernstein. Is it an exaggeration to say that the last great battle of the Civil War was won on November 4th, 2008?
I agree with you, but what do you mean, "almost as though"? Don't you think he's known for a long time that this outcome was likely, and had prepared something before election day?
Let's see how he does, and what challenges he faces going forward.
Should be interesting watching them try, though.
If there's a racial angle here, it will be that the accusation of racism will be, if it is not already, seen as a manipulative scam.
The race card will be played so often and so falsely that it will be dead before the end of the O admin.
Oh please.
As a conservative who voted for Obama (proudly and without internal struggling), I don't think this statement has any credibility. Conservatives will have no justification for treating Obama as liberals did Bush, unless Obama invades a foreign country for no reason.
Really?
I believe the libs were trashing Bush before the votes were counted in 2000.
Blaming him for everything. I recall a person claiming it was Bush's fault that unemployment hadn't been extended. I pointed out the measure had failed in the senate. Her response was, "I still think it was Bush's fault". She was not alone.
In addition, your nonsensical implication that only the invasion of Iraq got anybody's dander up is...nonsensical.
Wasn't that Sasha's original point?
Please. Bush had valid reasons and Congress agreed with them.
The fight against racism defined their youth and they won't give it up, or they'd have nothing left of themselves.
So they need to see racism everywhere. Or they're lost.
As long as people resort to the "race card" at the drop of a hat, no, it won't.
When it comes to race I'm a confirmed skeptic. The election is a milestone but will it make much of a difference in race relations?
It can't hurt.
It's truly astounding to see the level of abject myopia in the comments above. This election is not going to just "flip a switch" on race relations. It's another step. A big step, but just another one. We will all relearn in a few weeks, as we do every year when our TVs play host to the philosophy of Rankin-Bass, it's "one step in front of the other."
I am half-white, half-chinese, I was raised in Montana. I speak no chinese.
However, to others (being 1 of 2 asian kids in my class during all of school), I was chinese. When my wife and I lived in Hawaii, I was given the benefit of the doubt of being "local" unless I self-indentified as a mainlander.
Not necessarily a bad thing, but you tend to get lumped with whatever group you look like. To most of America, Obama is black. I kind of felt the same way, when Halle Berry won her Academy Award. She was also raised her white mother, if I remember correctly. But, to most of us, she is black because she looks more black than white.
EH has the truth of it. It is a step, but race still exists. Racism will exist as long as race does. Though we as a nation have made great strides, as this election evidences.
Class act.
I'm doubtful there will be a SCOTUS case finding a right to gay marriage, but, let's suppose for the sake of argument that it happens. Just as in Loving, there will be immediate opposition but look now 40 years from Loving, there is absolutely no mainstream political support for banning interracial marriage.
Gay marriage has always been a question of when, not if.
And I fear your premise is defective, as well. Do you think Obama's election will help or hurt David Duke's recruitment? I'm not saying that avoiding aid to the David Dukes of the world is a reason to vote against Obama, any more than the claim that McCain's election would have helped Al Qaeda recruiting is an argument against McCain. But you have to recognize that Obama's election will stoke, not starve, racial tension, not least because his minions describe any opposition on any basis as "racism". The few real racists that are left will exploit the resentment that kind of horsesh*t engenders. We will have to find a way to work through this tension, even as we oppose Obama's policies.
I live in Memphis. We have had a black mayor pretty much the entire time I've lived here. Has that made racial tensions diminish? I used to think it might, but experience has taught me better.
BBB
I don't doubt that's true, but again I think you're seeing something more or less universal through your ideological filter. Many people of every political stripe form a lifelong identity around the organizing events or fashions of their adolescence and early adulthood.* Others are more malleable. The tendency to keep seeing the world through the eyes of youth is probably stronger than average in the group you describe since their social-political environment was unusually momentous. Just like their parents never "got over" the Depression and WWII.
Have some pity for those who came along a few years later, i.e., too late for Civil Rights and Rock and Roll, but too soon for Ronald Reagan. They were left to find their way through the post-Nam, post-Watergate, stagflation miasma. Jimmy Carter may have been a terrible president with a tin ear, but he was absolutely right that there was a national malaise. Disco sure as hell didn't help. Ironically, these "tweeners" may be better now at navigating the world's changes than are your contemporaries or the kids of the Reagan Revolution. Their formative experiences were so alienating they didn't form an anchor that holds them back.
Anyway, I digress. The point is that these things are not inherently ideological. If you can't see that there's a younger contingent whose feet are as entrenched in Reagan cement as your ex-cohorts are in the 60's, I'd suggest taking a few steps back from the picture.
[*ergo part of Obama's post-boomer appeal]
Cross Burned on Lawn of Obama Supporter
I hope everyone here can at least agree we've got to work together against the real racists....
BBB
now, i am proud and honored that we finally have someone of color as the top position in our country, but to say that he knows what it is like to be black, come on.