Features
Stuff from us
Academic Legal Writing: personalized bookplates
In Search of Jefferson's Moose
Sources on the Second Amendment
I Really Should Be Working On Exams
rather than trying to find the single cheesiest Lawrence Welk clip on YouTube, but hey, that's what the Internet is for, I guess. Anyway, here's the current pick, amidst tough competition:
|
News Flash
Wired's Kim Zetter has posted the jury instructions in the Drew case. PDFs are linked from her story at Threat Level.
Wanna trade?
I saw that. But she hasn't yet posted the proposed jury instructions that the defense submitted that the judge incorrectly rejected.
Now, back to LW.
Actually, there is some non-cheesy Welk. It's rare, but it exists.
Apodaca: cognitive dissonance it is. Amazing.
One; and
Two
Three
The video is great and all, but I'm in one of your classes at GW, and I agree - you really should be working on your exam. Cheers!
That was great!
Still, it's less painful than Barney. oh, the pain!
You and me both, professor.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7QVkB2utamY
Lawrence Welk! GENIUS!
In the spirit of trading duties, why don't you make a thread inviting your readers to contribute to the writing of your exams? In honour of Repeal Day, you can buy a beer (or a glass of wine) for the reader with the best exam hypo.
Luckily, I can watch YouTube *and* study for Evidence with the classic Hearsay Exceptions video.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken_dance
Are you kidding? I'll be disappointed if they took money for it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-bUCB8Hed0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xPKSgUin9S4
and my favorite...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P3nME1oeaRQ&feature=related
James Brown was also a perfectionist. With teeth as big as Chiclets. North and south.
If you have a comment about spelling, typos, or format errors, please e-mail the poster directly rather than posting a comment.
Comment Policy: We reserve the right to edit or delete comments, and in extreme cases to ban commenters, at our discretion. Comments must be relevant and civil (and, especially, free of name-calling). We think of comment threads like dinner parties at our homes. If you make the party unpleasant for us or for others, we'd rather you went elsewhere. We're happy to see a wide range of viewpoints, but we want all of them to be expressed as politely as possible.
We realize that such a comment policy can never be evenly enforced, because we can't possibly monitor every comment equally well. Hundreds of comments are posted every day here, and we don't read them all. Those we read, we read with different degrees of attention, and in different moods. We try to be fair, but we make no promises.
And remember, it's a big Internet. If you think we were mistaken in removing your post (or, in extreme cases, in removing you) -- or if you prefer a more free-for-all approach -- there are surely plenty of ways you can still get your views out.