No, it seems legit, according to the New York Times Nick Kristof, though "earnest and dull" -- spreading salt iodization throughout the world. Thanks to JustOneMinute for the pointer.
Features
Stuff from us
Academic Legal Writing: personalized bookplates
In Search of Jefferson's Moose
Sources on the Second Amendment
Anybody know if the salt used in commercial food manufacturing is iodized or not?
The winning entry? "As Canadian as possible, given the circumstances." I always thought that summed up the country pretty well.
(Years ago, New Republic magazine held a contest for the most boring headline ever. The benchmark was from a Times Op-Ed column — not mine — that read “Worthwhile Canadian Initiative.”
"earnest and dull"
But he repeats himself. The importance of earnestness is underrated, I'll grant...
In countries where respiratory infections are common, child mortality can be reduced by one-third by providing each child with megadoses of vitamin A about twice a year, at the cost of just pennies per child. This would also avert hundreds of thousands of cases of blindness annually caused by vitamin A deficiency. However, I am not aware of the use of vitamin supplements to prevent diarrhea.
Diarrheal dehydration, the world's second-leading killer of children, can usually be averted through oral rehydration therapy, which also costs just pennies.
UNICEF estimates that 25,000 children under age 5 die per day from inexpensively preventable causes.
Libertarians may argue that humanitarian foreign aid is not a legitimate use of taxpayer resources, but opinion polls of actual taxpayers have consistently shown great support for foreign aid targeted to saving children and addressing the worst aspects of hunger and poverty. Liberals and Conservatives alike applaud President Bush's PEPFAR (President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief). At the same time as we spend money to prevent and treat AIDS, we should also target our foreign assistance dollars to the programs that focus on low-cost, high-impact interventions that save lives for pennies.
Libertarians may argue that humanitarian foreign aid is not a legitimate use of taxpayer resources, but opinion polls of actual taxpayers have consistently shown great support for foreign aid targeted to saving children and addressing the worst aspects of hunger and poverty.
Leading to the not exactly shocking inference that libertarians are a small minority of the U.S. electorate, despite their disproportionate presence in the blogosphere.
Isn't that sort of "hearts &minds" activity a legitimate element of national defense, though? "America's our friend and does nice stuff for us, and can bomb us back into the stone age if we try to mess with them" seems like it would be more effective at preventing foreign attacks than just "America can bomb us back into the stone age if we try to mess with them", you know?
Iodine deficiency is widespread right here in the U.S.
This is too huge a topic to tackle in a blog comment. I'll do a brain dump of the high points as they come to me. (And sorry for using raw assertions but this is a topic that is close to my heart — and everything I'm saying can be validated online via medical literature, if you take the time to look.)
The US RDA is far too low at 150 mcg/day. Poorly designed study a few decades ago resulted in even worse public policy. Assuming we're eating enough iodized salt to get even the RDA is equally stupid. Just what you'd expect when we let politicians take care of our health.
The Japanese by contrast consume on average 25 milligrams per day (via seaweed). Japanese women have a much lower rate of breast cancer as a result.
Google Guy Abraham, MD, and the Iodine Project, through which thousands of women are using high dosages (by RDA standards) of iodine to support the healing of fibrocystic breast tissue (the presence of which is a risk factor for cancer). We could lower the incidence of breast cancer at an eye-popping rate if we'd just focus on iodine supplementation. I have personally experienced how iodine supplementation can turn back the clock on breast tissue within a couple of months. Got my girls back, baby.
Up until the 1980s in the US, iodine was widely used as a flour conditioner in bread. Guess when the obesity epidemic took off? When iodine was replaced by bromide — which is molecularly similar but not a nutrient, to put it mildly. Now 2/3 of us are fat.
Next time you have a chance to do some people watching, take a look at their throats — especially people who are carrying some extra pounds. You'll see that their throats look slightly engorged and soft. Part of that is no doubt fat deposits but I'd be willing to bet in many cases it is also evidence of a slightly enlarged thyroid — basically subclinical hypothyroidism.
One study suggests 13 million americans have "thyroid disfunction." study
So what do we do? Load ourselves up on thyroid meds. It's a travesty.
Iodine is taken up by every tissue in the body, from the glandular system to the skin. It's critical for heart health, hormonal balance, cell apoptasis (programmed cell death — the process that ensures that cells go bye-bye before they become cancerous), and dozens of other cellular processes.
Worst of all? Fluoride is molecularly similar. Check the table of elements. Both are halides. So our tax dollars go to putting a substance into our municipal water that among other things contributes to the impairment of brain development in formula-fed babies (because they ingest so much more fluoride than is safe) —
And because we don't eat an iodine-rich diet, we lack what protection sufficient cellular iodine would provide against fluoride consumption.
This may sound like hyperbole — I hope to G*d it is — but iodine deficiency could well be to Western civilization what lead poisoning was to the Romans.
New Zealand has awakened on this topic and is now recommending iodized salt be used for bread to help people get more I in their diets.
NZ gov page on iodine
Let's hope we wake up too, and soon.
"Leading to the not exactly shocking inference that libertarians are a small minority of the U.S. electorate, despite their disproportionate presence in the blogosphere."
Small "l", not so much. "Foreign Aid" doesn't imply that its only the government doing the aiding. Many de facto libertarians are actively involved in directly aiding foreigners (though they would call them "fellow human beings") through NGO's, religious and otherwise, that, intentionally, have nothing to do with the Lenny State.
If you have a comment about spelling, typos, or format errors, please e-mail the poster directly rather than posting a comment.
Comment Policy: We reserve the right to edit or delete comments, and in extreme cases to ban commenters, at our discretion. Comments must be relevant and civil (and, especially, free of name-calling). We think of comment threads like dinner parties at our homes. If you make the party unpleasant for us or for others, we'd rather you went elsewhere. We're happy to see a wide range of viewpoints, but we want all of them to be expressed as politely as possible.
We realize that such a comment policy can never be evenly enforced, because we can't possibly monitor every comment equally well. Hundreds of comments are posted every day here, and we don't read them all. Those we read, we read with different degrees of attention, and in different moods. We try to be fair, but we make no promises.
And remember, it's a big Internet. If you think we were mistaken in removing your post (or, in extreme cases, in removing you) -- or if you prefer a more free-for-all approach -- there are surely plenty of ways you can still get your views out.