SEIU ties in the Gov. BLAGOJEVICH Complaint.

I've been trying to sort out in my mind what SEIU's involvement might be. Here are the main SEIU-related allegations of facts supporting the government's complaint:

109. On November 12, 2008, ROD BLAGOJEVICH spoke with SEIU Official, who was in Washington, D.C.

Prior intercepted phone conversations indicate that approximately a week before this call, ROD BLAGOJEVICH met with SEIU Official to discuss the vacant Senate seat, and ROD BLAGOJEVICH understood that SEIU Official was an emissary to discuss Senate Candidate 1’s interest in the Senate seat.

During the conversation with SEIU Official on November 12, 2008, ROD BLAGOJEVICH informed SEIU Official that he had heard the President-elect wanted persons other than Senate Candidate 1 to be considered for the Senate seat.

SEIU Official stated that he would find out if Senate Candidate 1 wanted SEIU Official to keep pushing her for Senator with ROD BLAGOJEVICH. ROD BLAGOJEVICH said that “one thing I’d be interested in” is a 501(c)(4) organization. ROD BLAGOJEVICH explained the 501(c)(4) idea to SEIU Official and said that the 501(c)(4) could help “our new Senator [Senate Candidate 1].” SEIU Official agreed to “put that flag up and see where it goes.”

110. On November 12, 2008, ROD BLAGOJEVICH talked with Advisor B.

ROD BLAGOJEVICH told Advisor B that he told SEIU Official, “I said go back to [Senate Candidate 1], and, and say hey, look, if you still want to be a Senator don’t rule this out and then broach the idea of this 501(c)(4) with her.”

Snaphappy:
"I've been trying to sort figure out in my mind what how SEIU's involvement might be make Obama look bad."

I think that's what you meant.
12.9.2008 1:58pm
KilgoreTrout_XL (mail):
"I've been trying to sort out in my mind what SEIU's involvement might be."

Right, because you need to try justify your irrational hatred of the president-elect with something. Even if it's patently stupid and pathetic.
12.9.2008 2:01pm
PatHMV (mail) (www):
Kilgore, Lindgren doesn't even mention President-Elect Obama in this post. Has your insanity already been clinically diagnosed, or are you in need of a referral?

Do you approve of Blagojevich's corruption, Kilgore? Do you think we should ignore exploring whether SEIU was entertaining a pay-off to the governor? Or should we ignore all political corruption in Chicago on the chance that it might somehow end up being linked to Sen. Obama?
12.9.2008 2:13pm
Sarcastro (www):
I think Chicago unions paying off elected officials is breaking news!
12.9.2008 2:29pm
josh:
PatHMV

I think the other commenters' point was that Lindgren's PRIOR post tried to smear Obama, Axlrod, Ayers, ACORN and SEIU, all with the same muck.

Lindgren's wording of his new post ("trying to sort out in my mind what SEIU's involvement might be")sure sounds fuzzy in light of his smear post (SEIU = ACORN affiliate = "was tied" to Obama).

I think good-faith readers of Lindgren's posts over the last year can opine on his biases and credibility issues.
12.9.2008 2:48pm
LN (mail):
I've been trying to figure out how David Axelrod made Rod Blagojevich governor, and how Bill Ayers is involved. Also, what did Jeremiah Wright say, and is it wrong for Blago to expect Obama to "share the wealth"?
12.9.2008 2:48pm
LN (mail):
How do we know that the government complaint isn't a forgery composed by unrepentant secret SEIU Muslims?
12.9.2008 2:50pm
Crunchy Frog:
Well, we now know that Senate Candidate 1 is:

a) female, and
b) affiliated with SEIU.

Cynthia McKinney? Good God.
12.9.2008 3:07pm
KilgoreTrout_XL (mail):
PatHMV: You must not read this site (or Lindgren) very often.

Your follow-up questions are absolutely bizarre. While they really don't warrant my response, I would encourage you to go ahead make up your own answers. These responses can be tailored to your perception of an "unprincipled intellectually-inferior liberal who will defend democratic politicians at all costs."
12.9.2008 3:16pm
Bob from Ohio (mail):

Well, we now know that Senate Candidate 1 is:

a) female, and
b) affiliated with SEIU.


I think its Valerie Jerrett. Since "Blago" wanted paid, she had to settle for a White House gig.
12.9.2008 3:32pm
Mike H (mail) (www):
Jim you really pissed the Obamatrons off with the posts today.
12.9.2008 3:34pm
Sarcastro (www):
Mike H is very brave in pointing out that the only people who defend Obama are pre-programmed androids, and have no rational thought or soul of their own.

Personally, I'd keep quiet though, fearing their inevitable robotic fists!
12.9.2008 3:44pm
KilgoreTrout_XL (mail):
Dear Professor Lindgren:

It is (obviously) immature for me to call your article "stupid". I wanted to apologize.

This post, especially juxtaposed as it is with your previous article, is kind of nonsense I come here to avoid.

That's how I should have said it. Good day.

Best,
Kilgore
12.9.2008 3:51pm
AntonK (mail):
Forgive Kilgore, as he must be terrified at this time. Events are unfolding quickly, and it may yet be that Obama goes straight from his inauguration celebration to his impeachment hearings.
12.9.2008 4:04pm
LN (mail):
Is there any conclusive proof yet that Blago was NOT trying to blackmail Obama by threatening to reveal the true story behind his birth certificate?
12.9.2008 4:08pm
flicka47 (mail):
Ok, so SEIU's COPE program donated $90,000. cash to the Obama campaign. That is not counting their 527 ads for which I could not find a total.

SEIU,ACORN and Obama ,and Bill Ayers shared an small two story office building in Chicago for over 3 years. SEIU and ACORN have also shared offices/buildings in New Orleans and Washington.

So,somehow you don't think that SEIU thinks that they have bought a Senate seat??

You don't know Andy Stern very well,do you???
12.9.2008 8:56pm
a knight (mail) (www):
I tried to get a feel for SEIU complicity reading the complaint. Given the history of union involvement in politics, it would be unsurprising if their agents were involved in a pay to play scheme. Still I came away with the feeling that SEIU did not take the bait. The complaint states more than once that the evidence given is not all of it. Many of the easily identified persons the complaint notes Blagojevich solicited are likely to be the ones who contacted the DOJ, giving it the evidence needed for wiretaps. There may be a few that Fitzgerald has over a slow roasting BBQ spit trying to get them to roll. Two possible hogs getting basted are "Contractor 1", and "Senate Candidate 5". The investigation is not over. The complaint had to be filed prematurely to forestall a dirty US Senate appointment by a greed-headed criminal politician. Fitzgerald is sandbagging, and some big hammers are still going to fall on persons not mentioned in the complaint.

The Nation would be well-served if Obama were to reappoint Fitzgerald to his same position. He's relentless, not motivated by partisanship, and unafraid of a target's political power. Just ask Scooter about that mean ole prosecutor...
12.9.2008 9:31pm

Post as: [Register] [Log In]

Account:
Password:
Remember info?

If you have a comment about spelling, typos, or format errors, please e-mail the poster directly rather than posting a comment.

Comment Policy: We reserve the right to edit or delete comments, and in extreme cases to ban commenters, at our discretion. Comments must be relevant and civil (and, especially, free of name-calling). We think of comment threads like dinner parties at our homes. If you make the party unpleasant for us or for others, we'd rather you went elsewhere. We're happy to see a wide range of viewpoints, but we want all of them to be expressed as politely as possible.

We realize that such a comment policy can never be evenly enforced, because we can't possibly monitor every comment equally well. Hundreds of comments are posted every day here, and we don't read them all. Those we read, we read with different degrees of attention, and in different moods. We try to be fair, but we make no promises.

And remember, it's a big Internet. If you think we were mistaken in removing your post (or, in extreme cases, in removing you) -- or if you prefer a more free-for-all approach -- there are surely plenty of ways you can still get your views out.