The Volokh Conspiracy

An Opportunity In Gaza?

My colleague Amos Guiora always has insightful things to say about the Middle East, as proven by this recent op-ed from the Baltimore Sun. In it he argues that a wedge that has been driven between moderates and extremists in Arab world resulting from Hamas’s constant firing of missiles into Israel and President-elect Obama should take full advantage of this extraordinary development. Seems like a plausible idea to me, although I am skeptical that anything positive will result given the current leadership in Gaza.

Guiora does recount a great quote that seems to explain a lot: Abba Eban famously referring to "the Palestinians never missing an opportunity to miss an opportunity." What was Hamas expecting to happen from firing thousands of rockets into Israel?

Sum Budy:
Typo alert: should read "never missing an opportunity."
1.5.2009 12:20pm
Paul B:
Professor Cassell,

I believe your colleague, Amos Guiora, is filled with wishful thinking. Based on conversations I've had this weekend with westernized Arabs in the Middle East, I believe a more likely outcome is that the autocratic governments that we like to call "moderate" will be under intense pressure from their populations to show solidarity with Gaza residents rather than continuing to discreetly support Israeli efforts to undercut Hamas.
1.5.2009 12:25pm
Steve:
One of the problems with military action, as advisable as it might be on other grounds, is that it has the effect of driving the moderates and the extremists closer together. Even moderate Palestinians who didn't agree with the rocket attacks are unlikely to spend much time saying "oh well, we deserve this" as Israeli bombs fall around them. Most people just aren't wired like that.

Of course, a related problem is that there are many people - I'm sure we can find some fine examples in the VC comments section - who simply don't believe there's such a creature as a "moderate Palestinian" or a "moderate Muslim." It's awfully hard to reach out to the moderates if your policymakers think this way!
1.5.2009 12:29pm
Matthew K:
I imagine Hamas was expecting Israel to commence military operations in Gaza. They apparently thought this was good for them. The Israeli government, however, thinks military action in Gaza is good for them. I find this strange and expect that at least one, perhaps both, are wrong.
1.5.2009 12:36pm
Tony Tutins (mail):
I would say retaliation for Israel's continuing punishment of Gaza for voting the party Israel disfavored into power in 2006:

On January 24, 2008, the United Nations Human Rights Council released a statement calling for Israel to lift its "siege" on the Gaza Strip, allow the continued supply of food, fuel, and medicine, and reopen border crossings

Keep in mind that there is no solution to the Middle East conflict that will leave all parties satisfied. The two-state solution would wreak the least havoc on Israel but falls far short of repatriating all of the '48 War refugees, which of course would lead to a Jewish state that is majority Muslim. Palestine would be an unappealing homeland for Israeli Arabs, who currently live far better than do Palestinians. Israel could try offering to compensate refugees who left in 48, to get rid of the thousands of aggrieved with their lives on hold -- not that I believe this would satisfy them.

The Gordian knot was trivial compared to this.
1.5.2009 12:40pm
Sarcastro (www):
You don't think those rockets had anything to do with it, Tony Tutins?

Maybe Israel has been just biding their time since the election of Hamas till the soonest election day Christmas, when they knew they could strike without American interference! Playing the long game!
1.5.2009 12:45pm
Joel Rosenberg (mail) (www):
Alas, Paul B. is right. When it comes to the unifying power of the Zionist distraction, other differences -- Nasser calling King Hussein a "Hashemite harlot", Arafat trying to overthrow the same guy, Hamasholes throwing PLO kleptocrats off roofs, with or without having shot them through the knees first -- are quickly forgotten.

And it even makes sense, in the local context. Hamas won't distract the Gazans from their dreary (on a good day) lot by pointing to the Arafatopia next door, not when there's F16s overhead; the less dramatic failure of Abbas' PA won't be the fault of Hamas when it's so easy to point to the hated checkpoints.

Matthew K: think asymmetric "good." Being turned into fly food obviously isn't good for the head Hamasholes, but given the stress that the embargo has put on Gaza, they may have correctly thought that they had no choice but to create a distraction or face a widespread local uprising.

If -- and I hope but doubt that this is the case -- OCL is the start of the necessary retaliatory component to make the Gaza withdrawal work for Israel, it will be good for Israel. Depends on what the followup is.

Steve: it depends. If you define "moderate" as "less extreme than this other actual guy we can point to", you can find moderates pretty much in any group -- certainly including the Arabs of Judea, Samaria, and Gaza -- and there's nothing wrong with that, particularly. It's different, though, from pointing to somebody who speaks (both in English and Arabic) and acts with actual moderation.

The problem is when the people who point to somebody who is only a moderate-by-comparison that Israel make the kind of concessions to him or her (Hanan Ashrawi comes to mind) that would be reasonably demanded on behalf of the moderate kind of moderate.
1.5.2009 12:52pm
ichthyophagous (mail):
How can Guiora expect moderate Arabs to "step up to the plate" when there is no confirmation (that I can see, anyway) that extremists have been repudiated? Would he schedule a new election in Gaza?
1.5.2009 1:01pm
Sagar:
One of the benefits of the Obama victory is his present silence on the matter; i am pretty sure McCain would be running his mouth off were he the pres-elect (whether "we are all Israelis" or "we are all Gazans").
1.5.2009 1:17pm
Dan28 (mail):

What was Hamas expecting to happen from firing thousands of rockets into Israel?

Probably exactly this. Hamas has been fading in popularity. They aren't particularly good at building a stable society, and the PLO is looking like a better option to many Palestinians. But now they're at war, and its during times of war that people turn to groups like Hamas. The Israelis aren't going to be able to kill all of Hamas, and whenever they leave whatever remains will declare victory. People who three weeks ago wanted Hamas out will find their doubts inexpressable in mainstream conversations, just as war has muted the voices of the Israeli left.

They don't care how many of their leadership you kill - they care whether their movement becomes more or less powerful. This attack is going to make it more powerful, just like the attack in Lebanon made Hizb'allah more powerful. They will happily keep playing this game for as long as Israel wants to play it.
1.5.2009 1:19pm
John Burgess (mail) (www):
The current situation is providing a wedge issue, being well-played by Hamas, to separate moderate Arab governments from their peoples.

While those governments might wish Hamas to be eradicated, constant media messages (and particularly images) about dead children is fueling popular anger. This puts governments and their people on opposite sides of the line.
1.5.2009 1:42pm
Glenn W. Bowen (mail):
Plausible, schmausible-

They never miss the opportunity to miss the opportunity because they don't want the opportunity. The post is basically textual masturbation; the Arabs, whoever they are, want to exterminate the Jews- forever and always, history bears it out, and they do, because they outright say that's what they want to do.

What a feather in nobody's cap getting these people to sit down and negotiate lie.

Why do people insist on repeatedly placing their hand on the hot Palestinian stove?
1.5.2009 1:46pm
Richard Aubrey (mail):
Could be that the goal was to provoke Israeli reaction and use up combat power and attention that could have gone to busting Iran's nukes before O is in a position to veto same.
1.5.2009 4:55pm
einhverfr (mail) (www):
I am not optimistic. However, progress can be made. Peace between Israel and Syria, with Syria getting the Golan back would be a nice step forward.

Then we have to just convince Israel that a full and viable Palestinian state needs a viable and competent ARMY, not just a police force. Otherwise, we are stuck in a situation where foreign proxies are too strong to be challenged by anyone but Israel and so these fights break out.
1.5.2009 7:45pm
donaldk2 (mail):
Glenn W. Bowen:

I too thought Eban's bon mot was idiotic right from the start.

Typical bien pensant. None so blind as those who will not see.
1.6.2009 3:32am

Post as: [Register] [Log In]

Account:
Password:
Remember info?

If you have a comment about spelling, typos, or format errors, please e-mail the poster directly rather than posting a comment.

Comment Policy: We reserve the right to edit or delete comments, and in extreme cases to ban commenters, at our discretion. Comments must be relevant and civil (and, especially, free of name-calling). We think of comment threads like dinner parties at our homes. If you make the party unpleasant for us or for others, we'd rather you went elsewhere. We're happy to see a wide range of viewpoints, but we want all of them to be expressed as politely as possible.

We realize that such a comment policy can never be evenly enforced, because we can't possibly monitor every comment equally well. Hundreds of comments are posted every day here, and we don't read them all. Those we read, we read with different degrees of attention, and in different moods. We try to be fair, but we make no promises.

And remember, it's a big Internet. If you think we were mistaken in removing your post (or, in extreme cases, in removing you) -- or if you prefer a more free-for-all approach -- there are surely plenty of ways you can still get your views out.