The Volokh Conspiracy

A Celebrity SG:

President-elect Obama wants Dr. Sanjay Gupta of CNN and CBS News to be the next Surgeon General. [What? You thought this post was about the other SG?] According to Obama, Gupta "could be the highest-profile surgeon general in history and would have an expanded role in providing health policy advice," according to the Washington Post's sources. I'm sure Gupta is suitably qualified for the post. As Yuval Levin notes, it has been some time since the Surgeon General was anything more than a glorified, uniformed spokesperson for government medical authorities, our own Nanny-in-Chief.

[Note: Post edited for clarity.]

Related Posts (on one page):

  1. Gupta Draws Fire:
  2. A Celebrity SG:
John (mail):
Another Nanny General. Oh, goody.
1.6.2009 8:19pm
commontheme (mail):
Okay, I'll bite, who was the last Surgeon General who was ___not___ a "glorified, uniformed spokesperson for government medical authorities, our own Nanny-in-Chief."
1.6.2009 8:20pm
Cornellian (mail):
Considering Gupta really is a neurosurgeon and considering the job of the Surgeon General seems to be little more than public speaking, I'd say Gupta is ideally qualified for the job.
1.6.2009 8:29pm
DiversityHire:
I didn't know his name before, but I love his show. He was even better on Blackadder. What a great choice for SG.
1.6.2009 9:03pm
Waldo (mail):

Okay, I'll bite, who was the last Surgeon General who was ___not___ a "glorified, uniformed spokesperson for government medical authorities, our own Nanny-in-Chief."

Gupta's certainly qualified for the job. If nothing else, he brings an established credibility to the office.

Besides, Obama could easily have done worse. Remember the S.G. who wanted to teach teens to masturbate?
1.6.2009 9:05pm
Guest101:
Egads, the very idea that the government should appoint a knowledgeable spokesperson to convey medical information to the public! Our God-given liberty to remain medically ignorant is clearly in grave danger.
1.6.2009 9:08pm
Moocow:
I'm not sure what part of Sanjay Gupta screams qualified to any of you. His hack sensationalist journalism is part of the reason CNN is such a miserable news source today.
1.6.2009 9:19pm
Sean O'Hara (mail) (www):
I look forward to Justice Judy.
1.6.2009 9:47pm
bushbasher:
moo to what moocow said. gupta is a hack.
1.6.2009 9:57pm
Elliot123 (mail):
How about saving some money by eliminating the office of SG? Fire all the employees and bulldoze the site.
1.6.2009 10:52pm
Soronel Haetir (mail):
More to the point why would he even want the position? Seems to me that SG is a rather thankless job.
1.6.2009 11:40pm
Dave N (mail):
The Surgeon General does have some important responsibilities. It is not a "do nothing" agency. The first "celebrity" Surgeon General was probably C. Everett Koop, who was a renowned pediatrician.

Surgeon Generals, like Attorneys General, can be addressed as "General." This little factoid is particularly interesting because the acting surgeon general is a Navy Rear Admiral, Steven Galson, perhaps the only person in America who can be addressed as either "General" or "Admiral."
1.7.2009 12:10am
jps:
The SG oversees the Public Health Service, which includes the Epidemic Intelligence Service (EIS), a program that even "small government" folks who decry the Nanny state should support. Most of the so-called nanny state policies are actually enacted by the legislature, generally on the state and local levels.

But when there's an outbreak of an unknown virus in your neighborhood, feel free to send the EIS back to nannyville.
1.7.2009 12:50am
taolaga (mail) (www):
I look forward to Justice Judy.
Agree with Sean O'Hara
1.7.2009 4:36am
Catallarch:
Dave N:

Like Attorneys General, the plural form here is Surgeons General.

The other persons in the United States who are both Admirals and Generals:

The Surgeon General of the Navy holds the rank of Vice Admiral.

The Judge Advocate General of the Navy (if a Naval officer and not a Marine) holds the rank of Vice Admiral.

The Judge Advocate General of the Coast Guard is a Rear Admiral.
1.7.2009 6:11am
Dave N (mail):
Catallarch,

I knew it was Surgeons General. My stupidity for getting it wrong.

I hadn't considered the top JAGs of the Navy and Coast Guard and you are right that technically, those people could be referred to as "General." However, I doubt the Navy Judge Advocate General has ever been called "General" unless he was a Marine General. I doubt the Coast Guard Judge Advocate General ever has been.

On the other hand, I have heard various Surgeons General, particularly C. Everett Koop, referred to as General Koop.
1.7.2009 10:49am

Post as: [Register] [Log In]

Account:
Password:
Remember info?

If you have a comment about spelling, typos, or format errors, please e-mail the poster directly rather than posting a comment.

Comment Policy: We reserve the right to edit or delete comments, and in extreme cases to ban commenters, at our discretion. Comments must be relevant and civil (and, especially, free of name-calling). We think of comment threads like dinner parties at our homes. If you make the party unpleasant for us or for others, we'd rather you went elsewhere. We're happy to see a wide range of viewpoints, but we want all of them to be expressed as politely as possible.

We realize that such a comment policy can never be evenly enforced, because we can't possibly monitor every comment equally well. Hundreds of comments are posted every day here, and we don't read them all. Those we read, we read with different degrees of attention, and in different moods. We try to be fair, but we make no promises.

And remember, it's a big Internet. If you think we were mistaken in removing your post (or, in extreme cases, in removing you) -- or if you prefer a more free-for-all approach -- there are surely plenty of ways you can still get your views out.