I'm writing a short item on Thomas Cooper, the late 18th and early 19th century English and American public intellectual, judge, legal scholar, chemistry professor, Sedition Act defendant, and troublemaker. In a 1794 work of his, Some Information Respecting America, I noticed the phrase "The government [in America] is the government of the people, and for the people."
This obviously sounds much like Lincoln's "government of the people, by the people, for the people." It seems equally obvious that even if Lincoln's line was indirectly influenced by Cooper's, the influence will be hard to trace, and it may well be that Lincoln's sources came up with it independently of Cooper.
But I did want to ask whether any of you folks know of any earlier sources that join "of the people" and "for the people" (or "by the people"). I might want to credit Cooper with having the first known use of the phrase and I don't want to do that if there's contrary evidence. So if you can let me know of that, I'll be much obliged. (I checked some searchable databases on this, but the difficulty is that many of them exclude words like "of," "for," and "the" from their searches.) Many thanks!
And it strikes me that Marshall was far more likely to be familiar with Cooper...
Google book search turns up a 1724 reference. Not the same meaning (I think), but perhaps a source:
Cato's Letters ...
By John Trenchard, Thomas Gordon, Thomas Jones
Published by Printed for W. Wilkins, T. Woodward, J. Walthoe, and J. Peele, 1724
Item notes: v.1
Original from the University of Michigan
Digitized Jun 5, 2007
Page 89: "Here then is a true standard for the government to judge of the people, and for the people to judge the government."
Of course, in the strict sense, you are right. But it's entirely possible that Cooper (or other Americans reading Cato in the latter half of the 18th century) fused this language with the contemporary notion of sovereignty of the people, completely undermining the meaning while retaining the phrasing. But still making Cato the original source.
The letters were quite popular and influential, no?
Fn 40: Shaw, Albert, ed. The American Monthly Review of Reviews. Vol. XXIII, January–June 1901. New York: The Review of Reviews Company, 1901. p. 336.
Fn 41: Herndon, William H. and Jesse W. Welk. Abraham Lincoln: The True Story of A Great Life New York: D. Appleton and Company, 1892. Vol II., p 65.
I found a source on Google Book from 1909 which discusses various sources that could have been used by Lincoln (Parker, Webster, Marshall).
Link
This is the Parker quote:
The American Idea: Speech at N. E. Anti-Slavery Convention, Boston, May 29, 1850.
http://www.bartleby.com/100/459.html
"[The Constitution] is the law of the people, made by the people, for the people, and addressed to the people."
Link
http://www.readex.com/readex/?content=93
We have shown before that it is God that appoints and chooses kings, and who gives them their kingdoms. Now we say that it is the people who establish kings, puts the sceptre into their hands, and who with their support, approves the election. God would have it done in this manner so that kings should acknowledge that after God, they hold their power and sovereignty from the people.And that this would then encourage them to concentrate and direct all their efforts on the benefit of the people
Vindiciae Contra Tyrannos. Brutus
I found this searching Google books: [string = {for the people}] AND [time constraint = {1600-1700}]
I didn't check for any 18th century texts. I saw many possible hits an a quick browse of the records, but did not search deeper. It would probably be better to narrow down the time constraints, as just "full view only" returned 355 records.
Also, in some other broader spectrum searches I breezed through, there were others authored by Samuel Rutherford.
VOTE McCLELLAN in '64
I'd never contemplated the origins of the phrase: "government of the people and by the people", but it seems plausible there could be Scottish influence.
If there is a connection to Presbyterianism, there is a tinge of irony along with it. Presbyterians believed in government for and by the people, as well as religious tolerance when they were being persecuted in England, but quickly turned into persecutors of other sects upon establishing colonies in America. John Adams and Thomas Jefferson wrote on occasion about Presbyterian fanaticism and spiritualism being a threat to the people's liberty.
There is also a convergence with Jefferson, Cooper and Presbyterianism, although I do not know if it is germane to your present task at hand. Jefferson, in at least two of his letters to Thomas Cooper writes about Presbyterian fanaticism in America.
1) Thomas Jefferson's Letter to Doctor Thomas Cooper, August 14, 1820. - Jefferson (ME) Vol XV pp 264-269
2) Thomas Jefferson's Letter To Doctor Thomas Cooper, November 2, 1822. - Jefferson (ME) Vol XV; pp 403-406
The latter is amusing to me because Jefferson uses a girlieboy derogation in his criticism of religious fanaticism:
I marked-up to XHTML and published a transcript of this letter for easy citing and copying, a few months ago. I would have marked-up and published the former letter this evening, but it has a Greek phrase in it, and my Greek proficiency is almost nil, so it takes a fair amount of time to assure the transcription is accurate.
Lincoln was most likely quoting Wycliffe.
If you have a comment about spelling, typos, or format errors, please e-mail the poster directly rather than posting a comment.
Comment Policy: We reserve the right to edit or delete comments, and in extreme cases to ban commenters, at our discretion. Comments must be relevant and civil (and, especially, free of name-calling). We think of comment threads like dinner parties at our homes. If you make the party unpleasant for us or for others, we'd rather you went elsewhere. We're happy to see a wide range of viewpoints, but we want all of them to be expressed as politely as possible.
We realize that such a comment policy can never be evenly enforced, because we can't possibly monitor every comment equally well. Hundreds of comments are posted every day here, and we don't read them all. Those we read, we read with different degrees of attention, and in different moods. We try to be fair, but we make no promises.
And remember, it's a big Internet. If you think we were mistaken in removing your post (or, in extreme cases, in removing you) -- or if you prefer a more free-for-all approach -- there are surely plenty of ways you can still get your views out.