Sunday Song Lyric:
"Unforgettable" was Nat King Cole's signature song. It's been covered by many people, but his version is the one that will always be remembered. The song itself was written by Irving Gordon, who eventually won a Grammy when the song was re-recorded as a duet by Natalie Cole. Here is a taste of the lyrics:

Like a song of love that clings to me,
How the thought of you does things to me.
Never before
Has someone been more . . .

Unforgettable
In every way,
And forever more
That's how you'll stay.
Here are videos of Nat "King" Cole singing the song and the Grammy-winning Natalie Cole duet. Word is, the song will also be featured in a commercial within the Watchmen movie.
EricH (mail):
Sweet. Oh so sweet.

Reagan liked to tell the anecdote of people enjoying a wonderful meal. A feast with great wine and food and breads.

And then he said, "But there was no chef who made all of this. It just happened by chance."

Well, Hitchens and Dawkins might laugh at that story. But I'm not sure it's all that silly.

Thanks.
2.15.2009 3:02pm
Bill McGonigle (www):
Holy non-sequitur EricH. What is this, poke-fun-at-Reagan's-understanding-of-science day?

Speaking of Watchmen, political history buffs here might appreciate some of what they're doing on the thenewfrontiersman Flickr stream.
2.15.2009 3:35pm
EricH (mail):
Holy non-sequitur EricH. What is this, poke-fun-at-Reagan's-understanding-of-science day?
Geez, you don't get the story at all, do you?

Think about it.

Here: Life is mere chance? Just material? We just happened to be here?

Nat King Cole just happened? His music, his voice? All chance?

Just like the great feast that Reagan talked about, life is full of these wonderful gifts, these feasts.

And like the meal, it was all chance? No chef?

Maybe, but hard to believe.
2.15.2009 3:52pm
EricH (mail):
Holy non-sequitur EricH. What is this, poke-fun-at-Reagan's-understanding-of-science day?

I guess if one has to explain an allegory, it's not worth it.
2.15.2009 3:56pm
SteveMG (mail):
The chef = God. The feast = life. Nat King Cole = the wine.

Can't have a feast without a chef.

Can't have the riches of life - music, art, courage, sacrifice, love, bravery - without a chef as well.

Or is it all mere chance?

I got it the first time.
2.15.2009 4:36pm
Hungry Hippo:
Some chef.

I wonder how many people would send their meal back to the kitchen if they could?
2.15.2009 5:59pm
Curt Fischer:
Wait, so Reagan worshiped his own White House chef? Man that guy was a weirdo.
2.15.2009 6:10pm
EricH (mail):
I wonder how many people would send their meal back to the kitchen if they could?

Solipsists of the world, unite! You have nothing to lose but yourselves.
2.15.2009 6:14pm
corneille1640 (mail):
Sloooooooooow news day.....
2.15.2009 7:32pm
Harold Kovins:
I guess when God took down Flight 3407 he was working on Bananas Foster.
2.16.2009 1:17am
Duffy Pratt (mail):
And when God asks who the chef was?
2.16.2009 4:38am
Bill McGonigle (www):
Yes, seeing that Nat King Cole's music is amazing and attributing that to intent is the natural response, but it's one that lacks rigor.
2.16.2009 2:10pm
joe (mail):
Your characterization of "Unforgettable" as NKC's "signature" song, clashes with mine: "Mona Lisa."

One must needs be mathematically ignorant to posit God as the only alternative to "chance." And logically ignorant to deny the existence of God because of evolution.

As a matter of opinion, though, I am comfortable with my correction.
2.16.2009 3:42pm

Post as: [Register] [Log In]

Account:
Password:
Remember info?

If you have a comment about spelling, typos, or format errors, please e-mail the poster directly rather than posting a comment.

Comment Policy: We reserve the right to edit or delete comments, and in extreme cases to ban commenters, at our discretion. Comments must be relevant and civil (and, especially, free of name-calling). We think of comment threads like dinner parties at our homes. If you make the party unpleasant for us or for others, we'd rather you went elsewhere. We're happy to see a wide range of viewpoints, but we want all of them to be expressed as politely as possible.

We realize that such a comment policy can never be evenly enforced, because we can't possibly monitor every comment equally well. Hundreds of comments are posted every day here, and we don't read them all. Those we read, we read with different degrees of attention, and in different moods. We try to be fair, but we make no promises.

And remember, it's a big Internet. If you think we were mistaken in removing your post (or, in extreme cases, in removing you) -- or if you prefer a more free-for-all approach -- there are surely plenty of ways you can still get your views out.