pageok
pageok
pageok
Forward vs. Foreword:

I just noticed that "foreword" is surprisingly often miswritten "forward," even in cite-checked and edited law review articles.

One data point: The Harvard Law Review's yearly Supreme Court issue contains "Foreword" articles, which are almost always by top legal scholars and often end up being heavily cited. They are also generally labeled "The Supreme Court, [year] Term: Foreword -- [Title]." Searching for "Term Foreword" pre/20 "Harv. L. Rev." and date(> 1/1/2000) through the LAWREV;ALLREV file in Lexis reveals 1795 citing articles. But running the same search for "Term Forward" ... reveals 179, with virtually no false positives. That's a much higher error rate than I would have expected.

Of course, one day "forward" might become common enough to be a perfectly acceptable synonym for "foreword." (I hope not, but it might happen; many perfectly acceptable words today were once errors.) But this day hasn't yet come, and certainly the dictionaries don't suggest that it has come. Plus in any event, when you're citing a document with "Foreword" in its title, "Foreword" is what you should use. So be careful out there.

mwah:
When it's misspelled in the original's title, I assume you "misspell" it in the citation?
4.14.2009 1:15am
Thoughtful (mail):
Very foreword of you to correct us all...
4.14.2009 1:33am
Syd Henderson (mail):
A similar thing happened with "forego" (to precede) and "forgo" (to do without).
4.14.2009 2:34am
Another Kevin (mail):
Of course, פֿאָרווערטס (yiddish.forward.com) is a document with 'Forward' in its title.
4.14.2009 5:58am
corneille1640 (mail):
Syd Henderson:

A similar thing happened with "forego" (to precede) and "forgo" (to do without).

Yikes! If you're right, then I've been making a bad mistake in my writing. Unfortunately, I'm too lazy to look it up, so I'll just take you're word for it.
4.14.2009 7:35am
corneille1640 (mail):
Errr....I realize now what you meant. Please ignore my first comment.
4.14.2009 7:35am
Tracy Johnson (www):
Far be it to be froward with your forewards.
4.14.2009 9:24am
jfalk:
The first time I saw this error in a document produced at work I argued that it was there on purpose to tell readers the book was in English, not Hebrew, as a guide to directional comprehension.
4.14.2009 10:00am
ShelbyC:
What are you folks talking about? If it doesn't have a red squiggle it's spelled correctly.
4.14.2009 10:15am
SteveinTX (mail):
I can't fully trust anyone who only knows one way to spell a word.


SteveinTX
4.14.2009 10:31am
The Unbeliever:
ShelbyC wins the thread.
4.14.2009 10:35am
one of many:

Of course, פֿאָרווערטס (yiddish.forward.com) is a document with 'Forward' in its title.

But that is deliberate, it is the use of the adjective/adverb "forward" (direction of motion) instead of the noun "foreword" (preface) which makes me wonder if some of the uses Prof. V uncovered might be deliberate "forward"s. I also wonder how many of those "forward"s are transcription/spell-check errors introduced by typists indexing pre-digital forewords instead of a shift in usage (see this indexing of which also includes the mysterious word "adn").
4.14.2009 11:49am
Sean O'Hara (mail) (www):
What, no comment about how "foreword"/"prologue" and "afterword"/"epilogue" have the exact same literal meanings but are used differently? You're slipping Eugene.
4.14.2009 4:22pm

Post as: [Register] [Log In]

Account:
Password:
Remember info?

If you have a comment about spelling, typos, or format errors, please e-mail the poster directly rather than posting a comment.

Comment Policy: We reserve the right to edit or delete comments, and in extreme cases to ban commenters, at our discretion. Comments must be relevant and civil (and, especially, free of name-calling). We think of comment threads like dinner parties at our homes. If you make the party unpleasant for us or for others, we'd rather you went elsewhere. We're happy to see a wide range of viewpoints, but we want all of them to be expressed as politely as possible.

We realize that such a comment policy can never be evenly enforced, because we can't possibly monitor every comment equally well. Hundreds of comments are posted every day here, and we don't read them all. Those we read, we read with different degrees of attention, and in different moods. We try to be fair, but we make no promises.

And remember, it's a big Internet. If you think we were mistaken in removing your post (or, in extreme cases, in removing you) -- or if you prefer a more free-for-all approach -- there are surely plenty of ways you can still get your views out.