For Jefferson Fans:

Maira Kalman, over on the NY Times website, has put together a truly extraordinary piece (I'm not even sure what to call it — an essay with drawings? a pictorial thought-piece?) on Thomas Jefferson. Lovely and lyrical, and it captures something about the guy that's difficult, sometimes, to capture in naked prose.

Jefferson's undergoing a little bit of a public rehabilitation these days, it seems to me. I'm absurdly biased, I realize; I just spent 12 years of my life writing a book in which he's the main character, and I developed the deepest admiration for his ideas and his principles and his approach to the world. But I do detect something of a turning of the tide — from a focus on "evil slaveholder" back to one on "profound thinker." It's a good move for us all - Jefferson's got a lot to teach us, and I think a generation or so went by when it was almost impossible to get any of that across because of the ill-regard in which he was held by so many.

Ms. Kalman's title — "Time Wastes Too Fast" — comes from a deeply poignant episode in Jefferson's life. I described it this way in my book:

"In the Spring of 1781, Jefferson was finishing up his second term as Governor of Virginia, the office to which he had been appointed following his service with the Continental Congress and his justly-celebrated work drafting the Declaration of Independence. It was a very difficult and unhappy time in his life. His infant daughter Lucy Elizabeth died in April; his wife Martha, who had never quite recovered from the pregnancy (her fifth in seven years), was also, slowly, dyingMartha Jefferson died the following year (September, 1782).

Her deathbed scene is the stuff of legend. Just before she died, she scrawled an excerpt from Laurence Sterne’s Tristram Shandy on a piece of paper:

Time wastes too fast: every letter I trace tells me with what rapidity life follows my pen. The days and hours of it are flying over our heads like clouds of a windy day never to return more – every thing presses on

In the almost unimaginably vast trove of Jeffersoniana out there, it is, other than a few inventory lists and the like, the only surviving item written in Martha Jefferson’s own hand.

Jefferson himself – whether before or after her death is not known – then wrote out the remaining lines at the bottom of the page:

– and every time I kiss thy hand to bid adieu, every absence which follows it, are preludes to that eternal separation which we are shortly to make!

Martha’s death threw Jefferson into a depression from which friends feared he would never recover. “He kept his room for three weeks,” his daughter Patsy wrote, and “walked almost incessantly night and day, only lying down occasionally, when nature was completely exhausted, on a pallet that had been brought in during his long fainting fit.” When he at last he left his room, “he rode out and from that time he was incessantly on horseback rambling about the mountain on the least frequented roads and just as often through the woods.” A “miserable kind of existence . . . too burthensome to be borne,” Jefferson wrote, “. . . all my plans of comfort and happiness reversed by one single event and nothing answering in prospect before me but a gloom unbrightened with one cheerful expectation.”

It wasn't entirely relevant to my purposes, in the book - but so touching I felt I couldn't exclude it.

I never did, however, find a way to sneak in the loveliest piece of Jeffersoniana out there — the bookend, as it were, to Martha's deathbed scene. In 1818, when informed of the death of Abigail Adams, Jefferson sent his condolences to her husband — with whom he had just a few years before resumed correspondence after nearly fifteen years (fifteen years that had been filled with rancor and bile on both sides). It's a hard genre, the letter of condolence, and Jefferson writes the most beautiful one I've ever read:

"The public papers, my dear friend, announce the fatal event of which your letter of Oct. 20 had given me ominous foreboding. Tried myself, in the school of affliction, by the loss of every form of connection which can rive the human heart, I know well, and feel what you have lost, what you have suffered, are suffering, and have yet to endure. The same trials have taught me that, for ills so immeasurable, time and silence are the only medicines. I will not therefore, by useless condolences, open afresh the sluices of your grief nor, although mingling sincerely my tears with yours, will I say a word more, where words are vain, but that it is of some comfort to us both that the term is not very distant at which we are to deposit, in the same cerement, our sorrows and suffering bodies, and to ascend in essence to an ecstatic meeting with the friends we have loved and lost and whom we shall still love and never lose again. God bless you and support you under your heavy affliction."

pluribus:
Great post. Moving, and opening a revealing window into Jefferson's soul, in which he demonstrates his ability to overcome past rancors, expresses hope for a life hereafter, and invokes the blessings of God.
6.30.2009 9:46am
Anderson (mail):
from a focus on "evil slaveholder" back to one on "profound thinker."

Unfortunately for his admirers, "hypocritical politician" hasn't budged much.
6.30.2009 11:30am
Allan Walstad (mail):
Jefferson, like Franklin, was also a first-rate scientist. It is fortunate for our country that he turned his considerable intellect toward statesmanship. Yet, he might have achieved equal fame for his science, unaccompanied by the vicious insults of unworthy detractors, then and still.
6.30.2009 12:51pm
Arkady:
I know that this is verging on the hacknyed, but that Jefferson and Adams both died on the same day, July 4, 1826, has, since I first learned of it, always engendered in me in a sense of something wondrous. And Adams's belief that though he was passing, "Thomas Jefferson survives." As if in the person Jefferson, Adams saw the greatness of the American enterprise instantiated in the soul of that singular man.
6.30.2009 2:05pm
seth neel (mail):
wahoowa
6.30.2009 2:37pm
Corkie the Dog (www):
Thank you for highlighting this piece. It was extraordinary, as you promised.

Sincerely,
Corkie the Dog
6.30.2009 3:12pm
Harry Eagar (mail):
You are right about the somewhat ineffable charm of Jefferson. I find it endearing that amid all the storm and strife, he took the time to be prideful of the fact that, again, as every year, he brought in the earliest 'dish of new peas' in the spring among all his neighbors.

(From 'Jefferson's Garden Book')
6.30.2009 3:31pm
LarryA (mail) (www):
Next Saturday in Kerrville we have a Fourth of July community patriotic sing-along, held at my church. It has been my honor, for the past dozen years, to read aloud the Declaration of Independence.

As a writer I am always amazed at the document, which though archaic of language is as fresh as the day it was penned. As a storyteller I am always amazed at how easily it flows from the tongue. As a libertarian I am always amazed that Jefferson and his comrades actually got it through the Continental Congress largely unscathed.
6.30.2009 5:04pm
cholling:
Is it a bad thing that, when I read "For Jefferson fans," I immediately thought, not of Thomas, but of George &Weezie?
6.30.2009 6:08pm

Post as: [Register] [Log In]

Account:
Password:
Remember info?

If you have a comment about spelling, typos, or format errors, please e-mail the poster directly rather than posting a comment.

Comment Policy: We reserve the right to edit or delete comments, and in extreme cases to ban commenters, at our discretion. Comments must be relevant and civil (and, especially, free of name-calling). We think of comment threads like dinner parties at our homes. If you make the party unpleasant for us or for others, we'd rather you went elsewhere. We're happy to see a wide range of viewpoints, but we want all of them to be expressed as politely as possible.

We realize that such a comment policy can never be evenly enforced, because we can't possibly monitor every comment equally well. Hundreds of comments are posted every day here, and we don't read them all. Those we read, we read with different degrees of attention, and in different moods. We try to be fair, but we make no promises.

And remember, it's a big Internet. If you think we were mistaken in removing your post (or, in extreme cases, in removing you) -- or if you prefer a more free-for-all approach -- there are surely plenty of ways you can still get your views out.