The administration's fiscal year 2010 budget request includes an increase of about $22 million for the division, an 18 percent increase from the 2009 budget.
Charlie Savage has the scoop in the New York Times. No big surprises, in my view: It's pretty much what any Democratic Administration would do.
He had two to dismiss recent high profile dismissals due to prosecutorial misconduct (Ted Stevens;
Maybe the Civil Rights Division will go after people who intimidate voters at the polls...
I mean, after all, it's not as if many of them could directly relate to Blacks through shared life experience, right?
Shouldn't Civil Rights focus on the politically marginal and powerless? Say, e.g., sex slaves?
If you're desire is to pretend like you on 4Chan
No, of course not, blacks aren't humans so ergo have no life experience to speak of. Go back to helping to find the great white hope.
They did. DOJ rebuffed GA's SoS Handel's request to change voting procedures.
To me, sex slavery is a much worse harm that the (alleged) housing discrimination minorities are facing.
Was it really all that hard? And is this the best explanation you could come up with? Maybe you ought to get out more.
Although I'm not sure it's only "leftists" who support the basic concept of anti-discrimination laws.
Among the critics, Hans von Spakovsky, a former key Bush-era official at the division, has accused the Obama team of "nakedly political" maneuvers.
Constantin has a point. If we saw 2 of them nationwide, that is a HUGE DEAL!
If you have a comment about spelling, typos, or format errors, please e-mail the poster directly rather than posting a comment.
Comment Policy: We reserve the right to edit or delete comments, and in extreme cases to ban commenters, at our discretion. Comments must be relevant and civil (and, especially, free of name-calling). We think of comment threads like dinner parties at our homes. If you make the party unpleasant for us or for others, we'd rather you went elsewhere. We're happy to see a wide range of viewpoints, but we want all of them to be expressed as politely as possible.
We realize that such a comment policy can never be evenly enforced, because we can't possibly monitor every comment equally well. Hundreds of comments are posted every day here, and we don't read them all. Those we read, we read with different degrees of attention, and in different moods. We try to be fair, but we make no promises.
And remember, it's a big Internet. If you think we were mistaken in removing your post (or, in extreme cases, in removing you) -- or if you prefer a more free-for-all approach -- there are surely plenty of ways you can still get your views out.