<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Volokh Conspiracy &#187; Martin Heidegger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://volokh.com/tag/martin-heidegger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://volokh.com</link>
	<description>Commentary on law, public policy, and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:48:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Putting Heidegger in the library&#8217;s grave of discarded lies</title>
		<link>http://volokh.com/2009/11/12/putting-heidegger-in-the-librarys-grave-of-discarded-lies/</link>
		<comments>http://volokh.com/2009/11/12/putting-heidegger-in-the-librarys-grave-of-discarded-lies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Kopel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anti-Semitism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adolf Hitler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emmanuel Faye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Heidegger]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://volokh.com/?p=21500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Monday&#8217;s New York Times has an interesting article about the forthcoming English edition of Emmanuel Faye&#8217;s book Heidegger: The Introduction of Nazism into Philosophy in Light of the Unpublished Seminars of 1933-1935.  In brief, Faye argues that Heidegger&#8217;s pro-Nazi views were not incidental, but were at the core of his life&#8217;s work. Accordingly, suggests Faye, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Monday&#8217;s <em>New York Times</em> has an <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/09/books/09philosophy.html?_r=1&amp;scp=1&amp;sq=faye&amp;st=cse">interesting article </a>about the forthcoming English edition of Emmanuel Faye&#8217;s book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0300120869/thevolocons0d-20/">Heidegger: The Introduction of Nazism into Philosophy in Light of the Unpublished Seminars of 1933-1935</a>.  In brief, Faye argues that Heidegger&#8217;s pro-Nazi views were not incidental, but were at the core of his life&#8217;s work. Accordingly, suggests Faye, libraries should remove Heidegger books from the &#8220;Philosophy&#8221; section, and place them in the &#8220;History of Nazism&#8221; section. From what I know of Heidegger (he&#8217;s discussed in my forthcoming book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0936783583/thevolocons0d-20/">Aiming for Liberty</a>) his intellectual influence on the 20th century was highly pernicious. Heidegger, like Hitler, wrote books addressing the question of what it means to be a &#8220;German,&#8221; and came to similar conclusions. Both writers were verbose; Heidegger was superior in the fabrication of elaborate philosophical constructs, while inferior to his hero is writing comphrensibly. Given Heidegger&#8217;s own dedication to Hitlerism, it seems that Heidegger himself might have considered it appropriate for his books to be shelved next to <em>Mein Kampf.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://volokh.com/2009/11/12/putting-heidegger-in-the-librarys-grave-of-discarded-lies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>184</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

