The Harper’s Magazine site contains the following (thanks to Christopher Rohrbacher):
[Letter to the Editor:] I was most impressed to read of Lewis Lapham’s ability to travel in time in “Tentacles of Rage” [Essay, September]. As far as I can tell, on the day I received my copy of Harper’s Magazine, the Republican convention had yet to take place, and living in New York, I think I would have noticed. Admittedly, the pablum will be predictable (barring some unforeseen event), but it seems awfully sloppy of Lapham to discuss feelings he had while watching something he has yet to watch, simply in order to put some additional feathers on one of his rhetorical barbs. What is most appalling is that he chose an actual piece of journalism, rather than his accustomed punditry, for this rather silly fillip. This doesn’t exactly give me faith in his understanding of what it is reporters actually do.
On the other hand, if he has in fact traveled in time, I would appreciate it if he could let all of us subscribers know the outcome of the forthcoming election.
Matthew Ostrowski
BrooklynLewis Lapham responds:
As Mr. Ostrowski properly notes, the rhetorical invention was silly. The mistake, however, is a serious one, and if I’d had my wits about me as an editor, I wouldn’t have let the author mix up his tenses in manuscript or allowed him in page proof to lapse into poetic license. Both of us regret the injury done to the magazine and apologize, wholeheartedly, to its readers.
It’s to Lapham’s and Harper’s credit that Lapham apologized, and did so promptly, via the Web. I’d like to know a bit more about how this error came about — but in any event, I’m glad that it was promptly acknowledged.
Comments are closed.