David Brooks offers a very different take on the Duelfer report than most stories I’ve read, concluding:
I have never in my life seen a government report so distorted by partisan passions. The fact that Saddam had no W.M.D. in 2001 has been amply reported, but it’s been isolated from the more important and complicated fact of Saddam’s nature and intent.
It’s a definite must read.
Update: Michael Barone concurs. (Link via the Blogfather.)
Comments are closed.