My colleague Neil Netanel reports that the Supreme Court has agreed to hear the Grokster case, and will thus again consider when the distributors of a product can be held liable on the ground that the predominant uses of the product are copyright infringement. (The last time the court considered this was in Sony v. Universal, the VCR case.)
UPDATE: Tim Wu predicted it. Also, here’s a post of mine on the Ninth Circuit decision that the Court will now be reviewing.
Comments are closed.