Archive | December, 2004

More on DDT:

Those interested in DDT — the miracle pesticide that saves human lives but threatened bald eagles and other raptor species — should read Ronald Bailey’s latest Reason column here. It is a thoughtful counterpoint to claims that DDT never had any impact on birds (see, e.g., here). To get to my prior posts on DDT, […]

Continue Reading

Prude fact of the day:

In an appearance before Congress in February, when the controversy over Janet Jackson’s Super Bowl moment was at its height, Federal Communications Commission chairman Michael Powell laid some startling statistics on U.S. senators. The number of indecency complaints had soared dramatically to more than 240,000 in the previous year, Powell said. The figure was up […]

Continue Reading

Anti-French “Racism”

A French intellectual reviews of “Our Oldest Enemy: A History of America’s Disastrous Relationship with France,” by John Miller and Matt Molesky for the New York Times and (translated from the original French) accuses the authors of “racism”: [t]he whole book is a mad charge (whose only equivalent I know is the fascist French literature […]

Continue Reading

Every election can be unanimous,

if you just focus on the right denominator. My former student Kevan Choset points to this AP item, on the MSNBC site: Although “Titanic” soared at the box office in 1997, according to a recent survey, it’s most memorable line — “I’m the king of the world!” — sunk.. British baker Warburtons posed the question […]

Continue Reading

Prestopundit on Left2Right:

Commenting on the new blog Left2Right (see below), Prestopundit has an assignment for progressive intellectuals trying to understand the conservative mind: read some Hayek. If leftist and independent academics want to engage non-leftists, they might consider engaging the ideas that non-leftists take seriously. It’s hard to find a conservative who isn’t massively influenced by the […]

Continue Reading

More on Yesterday’ s Bushism of the Day:

I e-mailed Jacob Weisberg to ask what he thought was Bushist about yesterday’s Bushism of the Day, and he graciously responded: The White House transcript didn’t have “to.” Hard to know what he actually said, but I’ll switch to the Post version to make it more readable. In any case, that is not the joke. […]

Continue Reading

Voting alignments:

The Harvard Law Review, vol. 117, p. 481, counts the percentage of times that each pair of Justices voted together in the 2002-03 Term (apparently the number of times they joined the same opinion, not just reached the same bottom line — “the number of decisions in which the two Justices agreed in a majority, […]

Continue Reading

Bring Out Your Feedback:

Are you happy with the Volokh Conspiracy? Annoyed with it? Is there something you want to see more of? Less of? Tell us all about it. Although the VC doesn’t normally allow comments, I tend to like them. So I am opening up comments for this post to give you a chance to give us […]

Continue Reading

The new Bush immigration plan:

CNN.com offers one summary. The key plank is to give illegal workers a three or possibly six-year temporary visa if they step forward with an [illegal] job in hand. When the temporary visa expires, then they have to leave the country. In the meantime they could apply for a greencard, although they would not receive […]

Continue Reading

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes