As regular readers know, I’m very interested in how blogs are changing legal scholarship. I’ve blogged about it a bunch of times, and I’m now thinking about writing a short essay about this issue for a general law review.
It seems appropriate, given the topic, that I would start by asking blog readers to offer their own thoughts in the comment section on how blogs have changed their own access to, time with, and use of legal scholarship. It’s a highly unscientific and biased way of canvassing opinion, obviously, but I just want to get some ballpark ideas on whether and how blogs have changed the ways that law professors, law students, and lawyers learn about and discuss scholarly ideas and developments in the law.
My request, then, is for interested readers to post something in the comment section (or, if you prefer, e-mail thoughts to me at orinkerr at yahoo.com) on how blogs have changed the ways in which they find out about and discuss new works of legal scholarship, as well as how blogs have changed how or whether they read different law reviews. Have blogs, whether on their own or in combination with sites like SSRN, made a difference to you?
Oh, and if you don’t like legal scholarship or you’re not a lawyer, no need to leave a comment saying so. This one is more for the legal geeks among our readers.
Comments are closed.