Some reactions I’ve gotten to last Friday’s posts on the supporters and justifiers of the Iraqi “resistance” have pointed out that opposing the war in Iraq isn’t the same as supporting the enemy.
In fact, I’ve made exactly the same argument myself in the past (see, e.g., my post criticizing the locution “objectively pro-Saddam” for wrongfully imputing bad intentions; see also this op-ed defending the rights of dissenters, and speaking disparagingly of “the natural tendencies of governments and their allies — tendencies that are only exacerbated in wartime -— to assume that they’re right, and that their opponents are traitors”). There’s no need to persuade me of this. And this is precisely why I am criticizing not all opponents of the war, but rather “those Westerners who do endorse the Iraqi ‘resistance,'” or who try to justify their actions.
Critics of the war should certainly not let themselves be browbeaten by false imputations that they support the other side.
Likewise, critics of the Iraqi insurgents — and of those who defend or justify the Iraqi insurgents — should not let themselves be browbeaten by false imputations that they are trying to unfairly condemn all opponents of the war.
More shortly on this topic.
Comments are closed.