Today’s Cleveland Plain Dealer reports:
A federal judge Thursday evening blocked enforcement of new identification requirements for absentee voters, agreeing that the state’s voter ID law is vague, confusing and unevenly applied by Ohio election boards since early voting began this month.
“Absentee voters are suffering irreparable harm right now,” said U.S. District Judge Algenon L. Marbley in announcing his decision. . . .
The emergency order will be in effect until Nov. 1 when Marbley will hold a full hearing that will also address whether the ID requirements should be suspended at the polls on Nov. 7.
The Associated Press further reports:
Under the law, an absentee voter must submit a written application that includes a driver’s license number, the last four digits of the voter’s Social Security number, or a copy of a current photo ID, military identification, utility bill or bank statement.
Lawyers who filed the lawsuit said the law, which also requires voters to produce identification when they check in at polling stations, is unconstitutional because of the inconsistencies in the way it is being enforced.
The secretary of state’s office has argued that county boards of elections should have a clear understanding of the law because the state sent instructions to them at least twice since May.
Ohio State’s Election Law @ Moritz site has lots more details, including copies of the orders and some initial commentary.