From Liquor Stores Fear Grocery Wine Sales, about “the fight over whether Tennessee grocery stores should be allowed to sell wine, which for the third time in three years heads back to the legislature on Tuesday” (thanks to InstaPundit for the pointer):
Nine years ago, Bard Quillman retired after 30 years in the banking business and invested his savings, and his future, in Red Dog Wine & Spirits in Franklin. Immediately next door to his shop is a Publix supermarket. Quillman dreads what could happen if the grocery starts selling wine.
“Am I worried? Yeah, I’m scared,” Quillman said. “This is a real-world situation for us. It shouldn’t be blown off as an issue of ‘convenience.'”
His shop is a high-end, specialty store, but he says cheaper wines — box wines, jug wines, the sort of no-frills wines that groceries would likely stock — make up the bulk of his sales, and allow him to branch out into the more exotic, specialty brands. The price of a bottle of wine at Red Dog Wine & Spirits can range from $3.50 to $200.
Quillman figures he’d lose 30 percent of his business to Publix and surrounding retail chains…. Right now, there are three places in Franklin that sell wine. If the law changes, he says there could be as many as 24.
“My employees all have health insurance, disability insurance, life insurance,” [Quillman] said. Right now, he has four full-time employees, but if the law changes, “I’d have to terminate at least one of them, plus one part-time employee.” …
“This will have a devastating effect on the mom-and-pops,” [Midtown Wine & Spirits manager Chris] Shearer said…. “We understand it’s a convenience issue, but at the same time, there are costs associated with convenience[.]”
Now let’s go back to 1845, from Frederic Bastiat’s famous parody of protectionist arguments:
A PETITION From the Manufacturers of Candles, Tapers, Lanterns, sticks, Street Lamps, Snuffers, and Extinguishers, and from Producers of Tallow, Oil, Resin, Alcohol, and Generally of Everything Connected with Lighting.
To the Honourable Members of the Chamber of Deputies.Gentlemen:
You are on the right track. You reject abstract theories and little regard for abundance and low prices. You concern yourselves mainly with the fate of the producer. You wish to free him from foreign competition, that is, to reserve the domestic market for domestic industry.
We come to offer you a wonderful opportunity for your — what shall we call it? Your theory? No, nothing is more deceptive than theory. Your doctrine? Your system? Your principle? But you dislike doctrines, you have a horror of systems, as for principles, you deny that there are any in political economy; therefore we shall call it your practice — your practice without theory and without principle.
We are suffering from the ruinous competition of a rival who apparently works under conditions so far superior to our own for the production of light that he is flooding the domestic market with it at an incredibly low price; for the moment he appears, our sales cease, all the consumers turn to him, and a branch of French industry whose ramifications are innumerable is all at once reduced to complete stagnation. This rival, which is none other than the sun, is waging war on us so mercilessly we suspect he is being stirred up against us by perfidious Albion (excellent diplomacy nowadays!), particularly because he has for that haughty island a respect that he does not show for us [apparently an allusion to England’s famous fogginess -EV].
We ask you to be so good as to pass a law requiring the closing of all windows, dormers, skylights, inside and outside shutters, curtains, casements, bull’s-eyes, deadlights, and blinds — in short, all openings, holes, chinks, and fissures through which the light of the sun is wont to enter houses, to the detriment of the fair industries with which, we are proud to say, we have endowed the country, a country that cannot, without betraying ingratitude, abandon us today to so unequal a combat.
Be good enough, honourable deputies, to take our request seriously, and do not reject it without at least hearing the reasons that we have to advance in its support.
First, if you shut off as much as possible all access to natural light, and thereby create a need for artificial light, what industry in France will not ultimately be encouraged?
If France consumes more tallow, there will have to be more cattle and sheep, and, consequently, we shall see an increase in cleared fields, meat, wool, leather, and especially manure, the basis of all agricultural wealth.
If France consumes more oil, we shall see an expansion in the cultivation of the poppy, the olive, and rapeseed. These rich yet soil-exhausting plants will come at just the right time to enable us to put to profitable use the increased fertility that the breeding of cattle will impart to the land.
Our moors will be covered with resinous trees. Numerous swarms of bees will gather from our mountains the perfumed treasures that today waste their fragrance, like the flowers from which they emanate. Thus, there is not one branch of agriculture that would not undergo a great expansion.
The same holds true of shipping. Thousands of vessels will engage in whaling, and in a short time we shall have a fleet capable of upholding the honour of France and of gratifying the patriotic aspirations of the undersigned petitioners, chandlers, etc.
But what shall we say of the specialities of Parisian manufacture? Henceforth you will behold gilding, bronze, and crystal in candlesticks, in lamps, in chandeliers, in candelabra sparkling in spacious emporia compared with which those of today are but stalls.
There is no needy resin-collector on the heights of his sand dunes, no poor miner in the depths of his black pit, who will not receive higher wages and enjoy increased prosperity.
It needs but a little reflection, gentlemen, to be convinced that there is perhaps not one Frenchman, from the wealthy stockholder of the Anzin Company to the humblest vendor of matches, whose condition would not be improved by the success of our petition….