Archive | June, 2009

Inflation Hedging Strategy:

Let’s say you believe that the massive, unprecedented increase in the money supply in the U.S. is inevitably going to lead to significant inflation. Other than TIPS, what do you invest in? Canadian CDs? International mining companies like BHP? Companies like Coca-Cola that get most of their profits in foreign currencies?

Continue Reading 61

Securd Creditors in GM v. Chrysler:

As I understand the situation, as things stand now, secured creditors in the GM bankruptcy case are slated to get paid in full on their claims. In Chrysler they got about 30 cents on the dollar. Does anyone know why secured creditors are getting paid in full in one but not the other? Whatever the […]

Continue Reading 51

Eduardo Penalver’s Defense of Sotomayor’s Didden decision:

Eduardo Penalver, a prominent property scholar, has written an interesting, but I think ultimately unsuccessful defense of Judge Sonia Sotomayor’s ruling in the Didden case, which I described and criticized here, here, and here. As readers will recall, Didden involved a case where two businessmen’s property was condemned because they refused to pay $800,000 to […]

Continue Reading 89

Off to Montana — Then Back to Columbus:

I’m off to Bozeman, Montana early tomorrow for a few talks and a conference, so there will be light blogging ahead. I’ll be back next week in time to give a talk before the Columbus Lawyers’ Chapter of the Federalist Society on Thursday, June 25 on “Judge Sotomayor, the Confirmation Process, and the Future of […]

Continue Reading

Goldstein on Sotomayor and Race Cases (Again):

SCOTUSBlog’s Tom Goldstein has an op-ed in today’s NYT on how Sonia Sotomayor has handled cases involving race on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Given my high opinion of Goldstein’s work, I found the article disappointing. Goldstein frames the article as a response to the charges that Sotomayor is biased or, […]

Continue Reading 21

Legal Ethics Question:

Is it ethical to try to admit a document you know is inadmissible, hoping either that the other side will fail to object, or that the judge will rule incorrectly? Is it ethical to try to remove a case to federal court that you know is not removable, hoping that the other players will be […]

Continue Reading 112

Rosen on Sotomayor, Part IV – The Liberal Dissenter:

Jeff Rosen will have another article on Judge Sonia Sotomayor in the July 1 TNR. This article focuses on her dissenting opinions and concludes that Sotomayor is, in fact, quite liberal, and could help push the Court to the left in economic and criminal law cases. Here’s a taste of the article: If Sotomayor’s majority […]

Continue Reading 6

Divide and conquer!

Republican divide and conquer the American public. Obama divides and conquers American Jews. Republican congressmen divide and conquer Democrats on cap-and trade. Chrysler and GM divide and conquer automobile dealerships. Interior designers divide and conquer small rooms to create an impression of more space. Marines are not dividing and conquering in Afghanistan. All of this […]

Continue Reading 13

Risk Shifting that Might Turn Out Not to Shift Risk?

The WSJ money and finance page had a story on Monday, June 15, 2009, about the return of an old financial product in new clothing for the municipal bond market. That market has suffered as concerns about municipal and state finances grows while concerns about the guarantors, explicit and implicit, by banks and financial institutions, […]

Continue Reading 9

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes