Archive | October, 2009

Could the Advent of E-Readers Lead Law Journals to Move Into E-Book Publishing?

I argued yesterday that the advent of e-readers would reduce traditional publishers’ marginal advantage in publishing scholarly books. This makes it possible for others to compete effectively with book publishers. And the logical candidates for this role would be law journals. Branding: Law journals have the sort of branding power that publishers do. If the […]

Continue Reading 5

Buys-Ballot’s Law

The 2010 election cycle will get going soon, so I thought I’d ask again a question I posed seven years ago: What is Buys-Ballot’s Law, and what penalties are there for violating it? The first person to answer this in the comments from memory will be publicly acknowledged as getting the special Volokh Conspiracy Profound […]

Continue Reading 22

CFPA Update:

The WSJ has a really sharply-worded attack on the CFPA today and mentions a new Blue Dog Democrat proposal (this is the first I’ve heard of that). David Evans and Josh Wright have a new paper posted on SSRN on “The Effect of the Consumer Financial Protection Agency Act of 2009 on Consumer Credit.”  I […]

Continue Reading 9

Incentives for Targeted Killing

I’ve posted before about targeted killing, and written about it for publication, as well.  I’ll be on NPR’s All Things Considered today, in a story by correspondent Ari Shapiro, talking about targeted killings in relation to detention and interrogation.  (Now that I’ve seen the story, I see with pleasure that it also quotes Matthew Waxman, […]

Continue Reading 64

Save the Deli

The number of Jewish delis has declined substantially, and the remaining few are in jeopardy.  Can a federal bailout be far behind?  Personally, I’d much rather my federal taxes go to preserve good corned beef than bad Buicks.

Continue Reading 26

Government Regulation and Copyright, Plus the Word “Always”

Orin and others rightly questioned my use of the word “always” in connection with my statement that the use of the description “property” in the Copyright Wars is ”always” a political move. I overstated my assertion, and should have used a less absolute word. Thanks for the correction. SK very much wants me to make […]

Continue Reading 33

Webcast on The New Forum-Shopping Problem in Bankruptcy

This afternoon I had the pleasure (along with Marcus Cole). of participating in a webcast at the Washington Legal Foundation on our article on “The New Forum-Shopping Problem in Bankruptcy” focusing on the Marshall v. Marshall case.  The webcase is available here. It is a bit over an hour long.  The working paper that is […]

Continue Reading 4

Prosecutor’s Wearing a Small Cross

Here’s the issue that drew my attention to the “rummy name” case, People v. Morris (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 5) (which, incidentally, has some quite horrific facts as well as an interesting usage question and an interesting government-and-religion legal question): The prosecutor wore a very thin, metallic cross measuring about an inch by one-half inch […]

Continue Reading 67

What’s a “Rummy Name”?

From People v. Morris (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 5), Either codefendant Carline Balbuena, whose self-chosen rummy name was “Queen of the Damned,” or defendant James Morris, aka “Ultimate Evil,” delivered the fatal blows to Balbuena‟s three-year-old son, Keith Carl Balbuena (KC). What’s a “rummy name”? My searches couldn’t find a meaning for the phrase, other […]

Continue Reading 29

Does a Cheek Swab for DNA Require a Warrant?

No, says the Indiana Court of Appeals in Garcia-Torres v. State: After comparing cheek swabs with other searches requiring only reasonable suspicion, we conclude that the DNA sample collection technique at issue here, although minimally invasive, is also one of those limited searches that requires only reasonable suspicion and may therefore be conducted without a […]

Continue Reading 48

Flotsam, Jetsam, and __:

Blackstone tells us that “Jetsam is where goods are cast into the sea, and there sink and remain under water,” and “flotsam is where they continue swimming on the surface of the waves.” But there is a third category that the law recognizes, though one that (in my experience) hasn’t made its way into the […]

Continue Reading 37

Workers’ Compensation Benefits “for Psychological Injuries” Due to Employer’s Legitimate “Disciplinary Action and Reprimands” — or Due to Layoffs?

I’m happy to say that the Ninth Circuit has just said “no,” in Pedroza v. Benefits Review Board, though I’m sorry that it took all this litigation to figure that out. Harbor workers are entitled to worker’s compensation benefits for a wide range of job-related injuries, including psychological injuries. And this scheme, like worker’s compensation […]

Continue Reading 8

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes