Archive | October, 2009

The Judge-as-Umpire Debate, 91 Years Ago

I suspect the debate over whether judges are like baseball umpires is as old as baseball itself, but here’s an early example I came across on Westlaw: A well-known English judge, watching village children drawing up rules for their cricket team for the year, said they were showing him how the common law of England […]

Continue Reading 6

Challenge to the Ban on Compensation for Bone Marrow

The Institute for Justice — one of the top libertarian public interest law firms — is filing the challenge today. Here are the Complaint and a short video; and here is the IJ press release: Filed Monday, October 26, 2009, in federal court in Los Angeles, Flynn v. Holder challenges the federal ban on compensating […]

Continue Reading 37

Tax Exemptions as Subsidies to Churches

Occasionally I hear people condemning the tax-exempt status of churches, on the grounds that the tax exemptions — both the exemptions from property and income taxes, and the tax deductions given to people who contribute to the church — are subsidies to the churches. This is especially common when a church says or does something […]

Continue Reading 79

Check that Checkbook:

My recent article “Check that Checkbook: A Guide to Smarter Alumni Giving” which was recently published in National Review is now available online on NR Digital. (At least I think it is–I’m always a bit unclear when NR Digital is generally available and when it isn’t.)

Continue Reading

Pretend “Gun-Free” School Zones: A Deadly Legal Fiction

That’s the title of my forthcoming article in the Connecticut Law Review; a revised version is now available. The article suggests that, under Heller, bans on guns at schools are constitutional. However, as a policy matter, gun prohibition on campuses turns them into targets for criminals, particularly mass killers. The response of anti-gun groups is to warn about the dangers of 18-year-olds […]

Continue Reading 55

Why Didn’t the Federal Government Even Try to Argue the Commerce Clause in its Supreme Court Brief in United States v. Comstock?

I am currently in the process of drafting an amicus brief in the Supreme Court case of United States v. Comstock, on behalf of the Cato Institute and co-blogger Randy Barnett. As longtime VC readers can probably guess, we will be arguing that Article I of the Constitution does not give Congress power to retain […]

Continue Reading 36

Can Obama accept the Nobel Prize without congressional consent?

Rep. Ginny Brown-Waite, Rep. Cliff Stearns, and Rep. Ron Paul say “no,” and have sent a letter to the President asking him to request congressional consent, which they expect would be speedily given. They point to the example of President Theodore Roosevelt, who created  a committee, including the Chief Justice, to hold Roosevelt’s Nobel Peace […]

Continue Reading 50

Louis Brandeis and the Incorporation Doctrine

I’ve read most of Mel Urofsky’s new biography of Louis Brandeis, and it’s an extremely good, and very informative, book.  But I’m afraid that Mel vastly exaggerates Brandeis’s influence on the Supreme Court’s adoption of the “incorporation doctrine”, to wit: (1) p. 618: “Scholars now believe that the Fourteenth Amendment … was intended to extend […]

Continue Reading 17

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes